OpenAI calls on U.S. to build 100 gigawatts of additional power-generating capacity per year, increase equivalent to 100 nuclear reactors yearly — says electricity is a 'strategic asset' in AI race against China

Sam Altman on stage looking a bit sheepish.
(Image credit: Getty Images/Mike Coppola)

Off the back of its globe-spanning, near-trillion-dollar infrastructure project announcements, OpenAI is now calling on the US government to invest more heavily in power generation, according to CNBC. Describing electricity as a "strategic asset," as much as a public utility, OpenAI believes the US needs to build up to 100 gigawatts of additional power-generating capacity per year in order to power the AI race it's now entered in with China.

"There’s a need for urgent action to prevent the People’s Republic of China from pulling ahead in electricity generation," OpenAI warned in its blog post entitled, "Seizing the AI opportunity."

  • Strengthen America’s industrial base
  • "Modernize regulations" to unlock more energy
  • Encourage the adoption of AI in American education and workplaces
  • Use AI systems in national security and government administrative settings

Ironically, for a missive largely discussing the fact that America has fallen behind its rivals in developing energy infrastructure, the summation of the submission doesn't touch much on how it might change that. There's a lot of talk about how the US could further adopt AI, and a vague idea of "modernizing regulations," to "unlock" energy, rather than building out what's needed to generate it.

The more detailed submission document talks a lot about speeding up permit and regulatory systems, "to allow simple AI infrastructure projects to skip the line." It also wants to see AI used in the approvals process for energy infrastructure projects, which it claims could further accelerate the Federal processes involved. It also alludes to leveraging emergency powers and accelerating environmental policy reviews by "considering the national security implications of AI infrastructure construction." Especially when being built on federal land.

What OpenAI doesn't discuss at all is how China achieved its incredible power-generating expansion, nor how the U.S. is already going in the wrong direction if it wants to compete. China has seen explosive growth in its solar sector, installing more solar panels in the first half of 2025 alone than the entire US solar capacity. If America wants to catch up and do so fast, it will need to mirror Chinese efforts in solar expansion.

The only real attempt the US has made to combat this lopsided investment into solar is to try to slow China down with tariffs, rather than rushing to catch up. Indeed, the Trump administration has made it harder to build solar and other renewable energy projects since its return to power this year.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Jon Martindale
Freelance Writer

Jon Martindale is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. For the past 20 years, he's been writing about PC components, emerging technologies, and the latest software advances. His deep and broad journalistic experience gives him unique insights into the most exciting technology trends of today and tomorrow.

  • SonoraTechnical
    Private company run by billionaire calls on gov't to fund massive infrastructure that will laregely benefit them and their objectives.

    How about the US gov't build a new lake in Arizona so BassProShops can offer competitve Bass fishing tournaments? I mean game fish , which become food, are a strategic asset...

    So yeah, my idea is insane... but I'm in good company.
    Reply
  • rgd1101
    I think OpenAI should fund to one of the electric supplier to build one.
    much like the donation to help pay military member during the shutdown
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    rgd1101 said:
    I think OpenAI should fund to one of the electric supplier to build one.
    much like the donation to help pay military member during the shutdown
    That would require that OpenAI makes money, right?
    Reply
  • rgd1101
    they worth billion. it is all funny money anyway.
    Reply
  • SirStephenH
    Things are only getting worse with Trump shutting down every major energy project set to come online within the next few years because they don't burn coal or gas. There's nothing set to replace them and the market doesn't want additional coal or gas plants.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    These tech leaders think they're hot stuff and have all this power and influence and maybe they do in some ways. But not here. They're going to find out very quickly about the morass that has stopped the U.S. from building practically zero new energy generation over the last several decades.

    It'll be fun to watch the big tech hot shots get humbled over this.

    There will be no new energy generating happening. I wish there would be, but I'm old enough to know. Americans aren't having it. Sam would be better served to invest his money in GE stock, the tech leaders are going to need more turbines.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Or ... we magically discover a different energy source besides electricity.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    rgd1101 said:
    they worth billion. it is all funny money anyway.
    Their valuation is ultimately based on projections of future revenue. But, building infrastructure requires real money, which they're still losing. So, they would have to load up on debt (or divert existing rounds of investment away from buying GPUs and cloud services from Microsoft), in order to fund any infrastructure, which their investors obviously don't want to see.

    TL;DR: they'd only fund this infrastructure themselves, as an absolute last resort. From their perspective, it'd be much better if you can get the US taxpayer (or electricity rate payers) to fund it.

    BTW, I mentioned they buy cloud services from Microsoft, who is investing in power generation for their data centers. So, in an indirect sort of way, you might say Open AI is contributing to their power generation needs. But, I'm sure that's just a small % of the total generation capacity they want added.
    Reply
  • rgd1101
    I'm sure their employee is getting paid
    Reply
  • bit_user
    rgd1101 said:
    I'm sure their employee is getting paid
    They do have money coming in from customers, but they're still dependent on their investors to cover the bulk of their costs.

    At some stage, I think startups do get loans like a more normal business, rather than raise another round of funding from investors. That probably happens once they have a solid revenue ramp, which OpenAI probably does.
    Reply