Cops alerted by AI gun detection system arrest high school student holding bag of Doritos — eight cars sent to disarm chip-toting teen
After Omnilert AI detects a gun on campus, there is supposed to be a human verification step before the cops are called.
A young student was left traumatized after being ordered to the ground and handcuffed by police because an AI gun detection system erroneously called the cops on his Doritos habit.
Taki Allen ate the bag of chips while waiting to be picked up from Kenwood High School, Baltimore, last Monday night (Oct 20), reports WBAL-TV 11 News. Football practice was over, and the student was sitting with friends outside the school. However, his crunchy repast triggered the school’s security camera Omnilert AI system.
20 minutes after he began chomping on the savory corn-based treat, eight police cars arrived in response to Allen’s snack habit. He was quickly ordered to his knees by armed police, and his hands were cuffed behind his back. “It was a scary situation,” Allen explained to WBAL-TV.
It didn’t take long before the AI error became apparent to all involved. Police were pleasingly transparent about the AI snafu, though. According to the student’s interview with local news, he was shown an image explaining the sizable police response. However, the picture puzzled him. “I was just holding a Doritos bag — it was two hands and one finger out, and they said it looked like a gun,” Allen said to WBAL-TV 11 News.
Sadly, the TV news cameras didn’t turn their attention to Allen’s explanatory gesturing when he seemingly demonstrated the pose that got him cuffed. We also haven't seen a copy of the AI-triggering scene from the night. So, we are left with a cautionary tale without clear guidance about how to safely cradle a bag of Doritos.
We’re excited to announce that Omnilert’s AI Gun Detection system has earned the 2025 Campus Safety BEST Award! 🎉🔗 Discover more: link in the comments pic.twitter.com/TkGrEs7e5pOctober 7, 2025
Omnilert AI at fault?
Omnilert was the AI gun detection software company behind this high-profile firearms hallucination. The firm refused to give WBAL-TV 11 News any comment on the emergency response callout error. It said that it “doesn't comment on internal school procedures” (WBAL-TV quote, not Omnilert’s exact words).
We checked out Omnilert’s School Security Systems product pages for more information about how its product works. One of the big attractions of Omnilert is that it can piggyback on arrays of security cameras that are already installed. Its publicity material name checks school shooting tragedies like Uvalde, Sandy Hook, and Parkland, thus implying that Omnilert might have prevented them.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Omnilert’s active shooter and gun detection system is purportedly a three-step process. After a positive AI gun detection, there supposedly follows a human verification step, before the automated notification and emergency response.




However, we can’t point to any of those processes being in error if the police also thought the Doritos-in-hand photo was ‘gun-like’ enough to send a response team of eight cars. The WBAL-TV report suggests that the officers had a copy of the AI-triggering scene with them, to show the astonished Allen, but we aren't 100% clear about the reveal timeline.
Omnilert and the school have offered to provide counseling to the students involved in the incident.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
hotaru251 ReplyOmnilert and the school have offered to provide counseling to the students involved in the incident.
Teen should milk it and file a lawsuit for stress and trauma.
The fact is either it ignored the human verification step or the systems so bad it made it look like a gun it can't be trusted.
This error wasted the officers time, gave a student unneeded stress, & did nothing beneficial. -
Crazyy8 This event actually happened at the High School near me, my high school and all others in Baltimore county have this system and have had it. I believe this is the second time this has happened with the system, the first being when another student was holding a hall pass shaped like a hand drill. I do believe the system is useful, as there have been multiple situations where a student has threatened to bring a gun or has brought a gun to BCPS high schools in recent months. Nonetheless, this error in the system needs to be fixed and I have sympathy for the student who had to go through the ordeal.Reply -
Gururu While this system is in its infant phase, would rather have a few false positives than a few false negatives. Jury still out on those. Not sure what the big deal is unless the cops were to have beat him senseless. The only real gun law the U.S. has is the 2nd amendment. The rest are just NRA constructs to protect wealth and keep the prisons full.Reply -
Findecanor Reply
In my opinion, the students' parents should get together for a lawsuit. You should not get away with scaring other students into believing there is a shooting in progress without proper cause.hotaru251 said:Teen should milk it and file a lawsuit for stress and trauma. -
txfeinbergs Just wait until the AI is in charge of the missile defense system. Someone opens a bag of Doritos in India... launch the nukes!Reply -
Rand0m_Guy Love the use of the acronym snafu... I dont think you know what this means. Incase you are wondering snafu is the military version (profane of course) way of saying "par for the course." If you're suggesting that putting kids on the ground over a bag of doritos is normal (par) even if messed up, you might want to rethink your priorities.Reply -
bigdragon I live near where this happened, and it's not the first time a false alarm like this has been triggered. We have a huge problem with the human review part of the process. The same problems exist in the red light camera and speed camera systems. Human reviewers tend to hit the easy button and let someone else deal with the results.Reply