Mark Zuckerberg says Meta is cutting 8,000 jobs to pay for AI infrastructure — insatiable compute demand means the company can't rule out further headcount reductions
Compute costs are crowding out headcount at the company that just raised its 2026 capex forecast to $145 billion.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees at a company town hall on Thursday that the roughly 8,000 planned layoffs are a direct consequence of the company's ballooning AI infrastructure budget, Forbes reports. The cuts, which affect about 10% of Meta's workforce and are set to begin on May 20, come the same week the company raised its full-year 2026 capital expenditure forecast to between $125 billion and $145 billion, up from a prior range of $115 billion to $135 billion.
“We basically have two major cost centers in the company: compute infrastructure and people-oriented things," Zuckerberg said during the town hall, as heard by Reuters. With more capital flowing toward AI hardware, he said, there is less available for headcount. He also declined to rule out further reductions later in the year. Meta spent $72.2 billion on capex in all of 2025. The midpoint of its new 2026 guidance would nearly double that figure in a single year.
The timing undercuts any suggestion that Meta is cutting jobs out of financial necessity. The company's Q1 2026 earnings, reported on Wednesday, showed revenue of $56.31 billion, a 33% increase year over year, while net income hit $26.8 billion. Q1 capital expenditure alone reached $19.84 billion, and CFO Susan Li told investors she couldn’t predict the company's optimal long-term workforce size given how quickly AI capabilities are evolving.
Zuckerberg's comments land in the middle of a growing debate about whether companies are using AI as a convenient justification for workforce reductions they would make regardless. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman raised the issue in February, telling CNBC at the India AI Impact Summit that some firms engage in "AI washing" by attributing layoffs to the technology when the actual reasons lie elsewhere.
Zuckerberg's explanation is more specific than most, explicitly pointing to infrastructure spending rather than AI-driven productivity gains as the driver, but that specificity raises its own tension. Nvidia’s VP of applied deep learning, Bryan Catanzaro, said earlier this week that compute already costs more than the employees on his team, and a 2024 MIT study also found AI automation was economically viable in only 23% of vision-related roles. If AI infrastructure is currently more expensive than the labor it supplements, the return on trading one for the other remains a dubious strategy.
Some employees have understandably criticized Zuckerberg and other executives on Meta's internal message board over the layoffs and a separate initiative to monitor employee productivity through mouse and keyboard activity tracking. "Getting everyone internally to use AI tools and getting to do the work more efficiently is not the thing that's driving layoffs," but added that Meta will monitor “how all this stuff trends.”
These are the largest cuts at Meta since the 2022 and 2023 rounds that shed roughly 21,000 positions. Across the broader tech industry, more than 80,000 workers have been laid off in 2026 so far.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
coolitic Considering the ridiculous sums of cash (10s of billions) that were burned in the monetary black-hole that was "the Metaverse" and "Reality Labs"...Reply
Perhaps this will finally be the death knell of Meta. -
Dementoss Reply
No, Zuckerberg will just boot out more and more employees to save money, whilst further eroding user privacy, to make more money, from increased advertising revenue. In the world of the tech billionaires, more money is all that matters, people are exploitable and disposable.coolitic said:Perhaps this will finally be the death knell of Meta. -
usertests Reply
They blow that money over a couple years, write it off, and continue to make well over $200 billion in advertising revenue as a quiet juggernaut:coolitic said:Considering the ridiculous sums of cash (10s of billions) that were burned in the monetary black-hole that was "the Metaverse" and "Reality Labs"...
Perhaps this will finally be the death knell of Meta.
Meta poised to surpass Google in digital ad revenue for first time, report says
Meta is not dying at all, it's thriving. We only think it's at death's door because they look so pathetic.
As long as the ad dollars keep rolling in, apparently at a higher rate than even Google which I found shocking, then they can afford ill-advised AI bets. -
Marlin1975 Well at least give them credit for admitting they are doing this to fund their "AI" expenditures not AI has made their jobs obsolete.Reply
All this money being wasted for this garbage.
But hey think of all the value its brought to their stock and top people. /s -
SkyBill40 Replycoolitic said:Perhaps this will finally be the death knell of Meta.
Not a chance. They are precisely where they are because people are so self absorbed and cannot live without, or imagine a world without, the specter and plague that is "social media." -
bit_user Reply
I block all Facebook and Meta domains. Years ago, back when they decided to allow targeted political ads, I decided not to give them another penny of ad revenue. Obviously, one reason I can do that is because I don't actually use their social media networks.usertests said:They blow that money over a couple years, write it off, and continue to make well over $200 billion in advertising revenue as a quiet juggernaut:
Meta poised to surpass Google in digital ad revenue for first time, report says
Meta is not dying at all, it's thriving. We only think it's at death's door because they look so pathetic.
As long as the ad dollars keep rolling in, apparently at a higher rate than even Google which I found shocking, then they can afford ill-advised AI bets. -
alan.campbell99 I wonder if they lay off too many of the experienced engineers who know what to check in the AI's output which will inevitably contain mistakes or errors.Reply -
usertests Reply
Wasn't there a lot of hype last year about AIs training new versions of themselves and becoming sentient by as early as 2027? Don't worry about it, it's in good hands!alan.campbell99 said:I wonder if they lay off too many of the experienced engineers who know what to check in the AI's output which will inevitably contain mistakes or errors.
Is Meta still releasing open models? Seems like it. -
bit_user Reply
I wonder if most of the layoffs aren't of either Metaverse people (or are they all gone, already?) or content moderation (or other stuff they plan to automate with AI).alan.campbell99 said:I wonder if they lay off too many of the experienced engineers who know what to check in the AI's output which will inevitably contain mistakes or errors.
Not to say there won't be any painful losses. I'm just saying they won't necessarily all come from core operations. -
LordVile Reply
Doesn’t really matter if you do they export their ad platform to other sites and domains. Meta are on this website for example so by visiting this site you are giving meta ad revenue.bit_user said:I block all Facebook and Meta domains. Years ago, back when they decided to allow targeted political ads, I decided not to give them another penny of ad revenue. Obviously, one reason I can do that is because I don't actually use their social media networks.