Tech industry lays off nearly 80,000 employees in the first quarter of 2026 — almost 50% of affected positions cut due to AI

Oracle
(Image credit: Getty / Justin Sullivan)

78,557 workers in the tech industry have reportedly been laid off from January 1 to April 2026, with more than 76% of the affected positions located in the U.S. Nikkei Asia reports that 37,638 of these cuts, or 47.9%, have been attributed to the reduced need for human workers because of AI and workflow automation. Despite that, Cognizant Chief AI Officer Babak Hodjat says that it will still take more than a year before we completely see the impact of modern AI technologies on the workforce.

“I don’t know if they are directly related to actual productivity gains,” Hodjat told Nikkei in reference to the job cuts. “Sometimes, you know, AI becomes the scapegoat from a financial perspective, like when a company hired too many, or they want to resize, and it gets blamed on AI.” Despite that, he said that AI-driven layoffs could still happen, but that it would take another six months to a year “before companies start seeing real productivity gains from AI,” and that “it will be painful for all of us as we’re going through it, and simply because it’s a transition.”

Article continues below

Despite all these analyses, some experts are pushing back against this narrative, pointing out that AI-driven layoffs were just being used as an excuse for poor business performance. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said during the India AI Impact Summit, “I don’t know what the exact percentage is, but there’s some AI washing where people are blaming AI for layoffs that they would otherwise do, and then there’s some real displacement by AI of different kinds of jobs.” While they say that some of these layoffs would still happen with or without AI, there’s still a consensus that the technology would have an impact on jobs and that we should be ready for a disruption.

"There's going to be a ton of people that are coming out of school that can't find a job and don't have the domain expertise,” Hodjat told Nikkei. “You have to bring them in. You have to have them learn on the job, on how to use AI within the various domains.”

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • -Fran-
    I mean... This: "Some experts argue that AI was just used as an excuse for poor business decisions".

    You can simply reduce that to: "shareholder grunts for more money and exec made bad decisions, then sacrifice the lower levels until neck can't be saved". Even then, they still get golden parachutes. It's the history of humanity.

    Some people use Iwata as the golden standard, but... That was mostly due to Japanese law being very clear on how lay offs should be handled, which, to my memory, is rather unique to them. Yes, it was a nice gesture, but not as selfless as many want to portray it as.

    Regardless, what is the "normal" here? Against what number does this need to be compared?

    It's a high number, but given the size of the IT employee pool around the world, not sure how it compared to "normal" movement?

    I didn't see it mentioned in the article/news. I hope I'm not that blind.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    I hope that the programmers who went along with creating their own AI replacements are the first to get fired.

    We know why the big wigs and power brokers want AI. Why did those at the bottom agree?

    No love. I got no love. People want to make their beds then complain that that's the bed the gotta sleep in. Well you did it!! What the heck.

    It's like who are the programmers who programmed in Google's spyware? Who are the programmers who programmed in Microsoft's spyware? Meta's spyware? Etc etc. Well if you are the programmer who created the spyware, you got no room to complain about your loss of security and confidentiality. None at all. Go eat your pizza, you baked the thing then you want to complain.
    Reply
  • Stomx
    Many who are not in the theme would be very surprized to find that in almost 100% cases the news about layoffs are met with the rise of stock prices by the respective shareholders.

    Hence be prepared: when AI reach the AGI nothing will stop the CEO at the request of shareholders to fire even the last employee.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    2027 80,000 people rehired after ai botches something to stupid lol.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    It's all AI washing. Executives can do lay offs while claiming productivity increase to boost stock price.
    Reply
  • DougMcC
    ezst036 said:
    I hope that the programmers who went along with creating their own AI replacements are the first to get fired.

    We know why the big wigs and power brokers want AI. Why did those at the bottom agree?

    No love. I got no love. People want to make their beds then complain that that's the bed the gotta sleep in. Well you did it!! What the heck.

    It's like who are the programmers who programmed in Google's spyware? Who are the programmers who programmed in Microsoft's spyware? Meta's spyware? Etc etc. Well if you are the programmer who created the spyware, you got no room to complain about your loss of security and confidentiality. None at all. Go eat your pizza, you baked the thing then you want to complain.
    Sorry to disappoint you but those folks are in immense demand right now. Immense. The people being displaced are all the ones who know nothing about how to build useful stuff for AI.
    Reply
  • ejolson
    Given the impact of AI on the whole economy, it makes sense to me that many job layoffs are AI related. What not clear is which layoffs are because a company did not adopt AI and is no longer competitive, which layoffs are because AI made certain jobs redundant and which layoffs are because the company simply needs cash to buy more computers.
    Reply
  • DS426
    palladin9479 said:
    It's all AI washing. Executives can do lay offs while claiming productivity increase to boost stock price.
    I suspect at least half of the layoffs aren't actually due to AI. Big tech has been laying off workers for a couple years now, before AI was useful in a meaningful and measurable way in the business world. I very rarely agree with Sam Altman, but I agree with him on that.
    Reply