Skip to main content

AMD: 2D Performance Progress in Windows 7 With Catalyst 10.4?

Trust Is Good, Follow-Up Checks Are Better

Since February and the publication of our 2D benchmark articles 2D, Acceleration, And Windows: Aren't All Graphics Cards Equal? and Part 2: 2D, Acceleration, And Windows: Aren't All Graphics Cards Equal?, we have been looking into the matter a bit more. As you might remember, the results of our performance exploration were concerned with Windows 7 2D performance in GDI-based applications using the newest drivers, as well as the unresolved issues with direct output to a visible display area.

In the initial articles, we referred to the Task Manager paradox. This was one of the reasons why some results were not immediately reproducible, and why measurements on similar systems resulted in different results. We will get to this later.

A Promise is a Promise

The problems we reported were initially met by skepticism from AMD/ATI. However, with the help of the benchmarks and lively internal correspondence with the driver developers, we were happy to see that the bottleneck was both recognized and removed. The reproduction of the problem ultimately led to the optimization of the drivers, as well as AMD publicly announcing that they would actively address this problem.

The release notes for Catalyst 10.4 now promise, among many other improvements and fixes, a performance increase in GDI-based 2D programs and benchmarks under Windows 7. We acknowledge this mention of the word benchmark with a humble smile, because, as a means to an end, it turns out our benchmark Tom2D was quite a useful tool. Let us start with a direct comparison between the different driver versions.

As you can see in the above graph, while presented as new in the Cat. 10.4 release notes, the changes in the drivers were in fact implemented prior to that version. In any case, the driver developers did a splendid job, and we like giving credit where credit is due. We sincerely recommend that users of the affected cards use the newest drivers in Windows 7.

While this pretty much concludes the first matter, we went into more depth and can present you with some rather interesting detailed test results. In addition to these individual comparisons, we will discuss the ‘paradox’ that initially led to incorrect evaluations of the benchmark results over the course of the following pages. Some questions still remain unanswered at this time.

  • ta152h
    Well, Microsoft creating an even slower operating system than their previous one is a company tradition. Bloated, slow, buggy software is something they take seriously, and it's not up to companies like AMD or Nvidia to take this privilege from Microsoft. People like it - they keep buying it.

    It's a pity OS/2 never made it. Windows needs real competition. Look what the K8 did to Intel.
    Reply
  • The Greater Good
    TA152H, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    Reply
  • Lines, ellipses, and polygons are rarely, if ever, used in window system toolkits from the last 5-7 years. You will likely never see them used other than in specialized benchmarks. They are an API vestige of days long past.
    Reply
  • Am I missing something? 10.5 is the most recent
    Reply
  • Poisoner
    the greater goodTA152H, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    What was insane about his post?
    Reply
  • Does Catalyst 10.5 bring anything new to the table?
    Reply
  • spidey180
    Keep up the good work ATI.
    Reply
  • FUtomNOreg
    Now where did I put that PCMag Winbench CD?????
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    Does Catalyst 10.5 bring anything new to the table?
    You can now over/underclock while running multiple displays without tearing on the second monitor....
    Other than that, looks to be just a few minor bug fixes.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    PoisonerWhat was insane about his post?just everything


    @ toms - nice article as usual.
    Reply