Ads
Ads
All about Tweaking & Tuning
 Latest Tweaking & Tuning articles
Undervolting Your Phenom II And Core 2 Processors

Undervolting Your Phenom II And Core 2 Processors
Did you know that PC power consumption can be reduced by as much as 35 W just by cutting back on CPU voltage? We looked for the best stable undervolt settings for Core 2 Quad and Phenom II X4 processors without giving up performance. Read More

  • Desktop Linux For The Windows Power User
    Are you a die-hard Windows user, sworn to shun all things Apple, yet (secretly) intimidated by the pocket-protector stereotype of Linux? Fear not! We got our hands on Ubuntu 9.04 and walk you through getting it running in this step-by-step guide. Read More
  • Toaster RAID Returns, Better Than Ever
    Back in 2001, Dave Goeke shared his first Linux-based NAS with us, which was literally packaged inside a toaster. His design has undergone several revisions (and a number of newer platforms) since then. Read on about his latest toaster-based RAID. Read More
All Tweaking & Tuning articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
Ads

Sponsored links

Cost Of A Benchmark Today: 3DMarkVantage Budget Was $5 Million

Next news
10:20 AM - April 28, 2008 by Theo Valich

Espoo (Finland) - Futuremark Corporation has released its 3DMark Vantage a benchmark that will surely be run thousands of times in the next few days. The DirectX 10.0 benchmark (yes, it uses 10.0, not 10.1) has native support for 32- and 64-bit mode and a host of other interesting features.

But in order to develop a benchmark that works natively with 32 threads (you can go all the way to quad-socket Bloomfield) and knows the difference between two and four gigabytes of system memory, Futuremark spent a small fortune - $5 million, that is.

Budget-wise, it costs more and more to produce a benchmark. PCMarkVantage ate a cool million dollars, while 3DMark05 and 3DMark06 each came with a price tag "millions of dollars" (3DMark05 = $2 million, 3DMark06 = $2 million).

We spoke with Oliver Baltuch, President of Futuremark Corporation. Oliver stated that the costs of developing benchmarks were going through the roof, and that was the main reason why the company changed the policy of charging for the basic multi-run version. The biggest issue Futuremark found was that companies were using the free version to advertise their systems, from AIB manufacturers to system integrators world-wise. Escalating costs were also one of reasons why Futuremark Gaming Studios was incorporated.

According to Futuremark, PCMarkVantage was one of the rare benchmarks that broke even financially. If 3DMarkVantage achieves a profit, it will be a major milestone for Futuremark, who will then have more resources to dedicate in order to make ultimate Windows 7 benchmark. Until that time, 3DMarkVantage is here to stay.

Tom’s Hardware has take a close look at 3DMarkVantage, which you can read here.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links