Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel: Voice Recognition Will Phase Out Touch

By - Source: CNET

Touchscreen technology yet to go fully mainstream.

Intel Senior Vice President Mooly Eden believes voice recognition technology will eventually make touch obsolete.

Eden, who manages the firm's "perceptual computing" operations, told Cnet that voice recognition will do to touch what touch has done to physical keyboards, which is, according to the executive, making a number of components unnecessary.

"Voice is the best means of communication between humans," Eden said. "We finally have enough compute power to do what we want from science fiction."

Intel is currently working with partners on developing such devices, as well as hardware, software, cameras, among other features. While they acknowledge voice is still an emerging technology, Eden believes it could overtake touch in three to five years.

During CES, Eden demoed features such as an eye-tracking "Where's Waldo" game, which sees the camera determining where exactly users' eyes are focused. It also showcased other games that follow hand movements and allows users to pick up and drop virtual objects.

"Everything is going to be immersive," Eden said. "I'd like you to work with the computer the same way you work with me.... I want you to say 'I'm not ashamed that I love my computer.' Imagine how many people who are afraid of computers will be able to use them."

 

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

There are 61 Comments.
Top Comments
  • 19
    dimamu15 , January 21, 2013 8:08 AM
    I don't know about that. I have pretty heavy accent and most voice recognition software I tried to use didn't work so well. People speak differently, but we all 'touch' the same way. So why would voice recognition phase over touch.

    Seems like a step forward into lazier future. Wall-e anyone?!
  • 17
    d_kuhn , January 21, 2013 8:16 AM
    No it won't... touch is useful for some things, voice will be useful for other things - one isn't a direct replacement for the other. Anyone remember the Bladerunning voice activated image enhancement scene? What I remember is that it took about 5x longer to zoom in than it should have... touch is a GREAT way to zoom - voice however is good for other things "Call home" for instance.
  • 16
    Darkerson , January 21, 2013 8:21 AM
    No, Intel, I do not want to have to shout at my comp/laptop/tablet/etc in order to play a game. Try again.
  • 14
    imrul , January 21, 2013 8:23 AM
    But what if you have to be quiet? I don't want to speak someone's number in a public (or private) place.
  • 18
    esrever , January 21, 2013 8:25 AM
    Why can't we just have it controlled by our brainwaves?
  • 12
    irish_adam , January 21, 2013 8:29 AM
    I find that hard to believe, what if ur in a loud area (for example a bus full of people shouting at their phones) also we invented sms after the ability to talk over the phone, i can type an sms way faster on a touch screen than a phone can translate comands or ring someone up. Voice comands just aren't efficient
Other Comments
  • 19
    dimamu15 , January 21, 2013 8:08 AM
    I don't know about that. I have pretty heavy accent and most voice recognition software I tried to use didn't work so well. People speak differently, but we all 'touch' the same way. So why would voice recognition phase over touch.

    Seems like a step forward into lazier future. Wall-e anyone?!
  • 18
    esrever , January 21, 2013 8:25 AM
    Why can't we just have it controlled by our brainwaves?
  • 17
    d_kuhn , January 21, 2013 8:16 AM
    No it won't... touch is useful for some things, voice will be useful for other things - one isn't a direct replacement for the other. Anyone remember the Bladerunning voice activated image enhancement scene? What I remember is that it took about 5x longer to zoom in than it should have... touch is a GREAT way to zoom - voice however is good for other things "Call home" for instance.
Display more comments