Best offers
|
Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade from... | $79.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... | $105.73 Royaldiscount.com More info |
|
Windows Anytime Upgrade Windows 7... | $139.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Windows 7 Professional (Upgrade) | $89.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Professional (Academic) | $127.89 Royaldiscount.com More info |
Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?
Often hailed as the solution to Windows Vista performance problems, we wanted to know just how much better Windows 7 really is. We put one of our most recent test platforms through its paces to find out, benchmarking raw performance and responsiveness. Read More
-
Tom's Definitive Linux Software Roundup: Communications Apps
This is the second part of our Linux Software Roundup. Part one covered Internet Apps. Today we'll be looking at Communications Apps. This includes personal information managers, email clients, instant messengers, VoIP software, and IRC clients. Read More
-
How To: Windows XP Mode In...Ubuntu Linux?
Windows 7's XP Mode has already convinced many users who sat out for Vista to go out and upgrade. But will they buy the right version of Windows 7 to get XPM? You do know you can get the same XP functionality from a Linux distribution for free, right? Read More
Partners
The Games selection
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
Sponsored links
Psystar Software Will Make Your PC Run OS X
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (81) |
- Share
Psystar fears no Apple.
Apple is a company that likes to control the experience of its customers. It likes to craft its products from top to bottom, both in hardware and software.
Ever since Apple went with Intel processors, the hardware differences between Macs and PCs became minimal. The software that runs on the hardware, however, remains very different mostly due to Mac OS X.
Windows runs natively on a Mac thanks to Boot Camp, but the relationship is mostly just one way. In Apple's EULA, it states that its Mac OS X software may only be used on Apple hardware – something that PC enthusiasts find unfortunate and restrictive.
Psystar, seemingly fearless in its technological adventures hackintosh-related, has released a new software tool called Rebel EFI that advertises the ability to install any OS on PCs with Intel Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, i7 or Xeon Nehalem CPUs. Of course, by "any OS," the company is clearly pushing Mac OS X.
If you've been wondering what all the fuss is about surrounding Mac OS X, this could be one experimental/economical way to find out. Psystar currently has a time-limited demo available for download for those to try out in order to decide if it's effective enough to be worth the $49.99 purchase price.
Check out all the details here, download links included.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
Related articles
-
Tuan: May I play devil’s advocate with you for a second? Davide: You’re welcomed to! Tuan: Say I am Apple. I come to you and say: "we understand your business model. However, the fact that you enable users that don’t own Mac hardware to run our operating system, hurts our own hardware Mac sales — It negates the necessity of owning Mac hardware to use an Apple operating system. How would you respond to that? Davide: I can respond to that with another question. How many people with a limited edition motherboard, a liquid cooling setup and a hand picked processor for overclocking and low latency DDR2 memory do you know that would buy a Mac? Tuan: Regardless of the number of those people, you cannot guarantee that those users would NOT buy or consider buying Mac. Davide: Then we encourage those people to buy a Mac, but our main target is not the typical Mac user. Our target is who would not buy a Mac for a series of reasons. Tuan: I see. That we can understand. But therein lies some ambiguity because since you cannot fully guarantee that your target audience would never buy a Mac, they then still remain as potential hardware sales losses. Correct? Davide: That’s what the hardware compatibility list is there for. The EFiX will work only on what we want it to work. This is to limit the users to exactly those that we want to use the module. I’m telling you that our module will as a matter of fact boost [Apple’s] sales too. Because the kind of people we address the product to will not mind buying Apple accessories, software and such, or why not a MacBook Air to compliment their Frankenstein at home on the desk. Tuan: And you avoid the EULA that prevents Leopard being installed on a PC because then that falls on the hands of the end user. Davide: We do more than that. We take to court whoever sells our modules bundled with a PC — and we are very aggressive about it. Our distributors sign a contract that prohibits them from selling PCs bundled with our modules. Tuan: Right, because then they’d be selling a hackintosh of sorts, going the route of Psystar. Davide: Not only that, they are taking away from Apple, its rightful piece of the market. Apple must have what belongs to them. We want to be for Apple what Iomega or Lacie is to them; someone that goes in their same direction, not someone who challenges or damages them. Tuan: Okay, back to being myself now. So you’re saying that those who are interested in the EFiX are already interested in buying a legal copy of Leopard. Davide: Bingo. But they don’t want to spend money on a desktop not addressed to them. Tuan: This is primarily a concern for many Tom’s Hardware readers. They want to try Leopard but the cost of entry is a barrier that makes no sense to them. Davide: That’s why we want to go alongside with Apple. It’s not really the amount of cash that is scary. It’s the meaning of it. Tuan: Explain. Davide: To one of Tom’s Hardware’s readers for example, an overclocker, modder, spending money for an iMac or Mac Pro is a waste. Tuan: And the fact is, Apple doesn’t have enough hardware choices for them. Davide: Exactly.
-
Apple iMac Display Problems Reported
Apple M9177LLA Silver 20" Cinema LCD... (10 offers) Online shop Price See more products Over the last month, questionable upgrade pricing (Apple OSX Leopard: More Angry Customers), censorship (Mac OSX Cracked for PCs/More Update Woes (Is Apple Now Censoring Tom's Hardware?), and a bug-ridden operating system (Update: More Leopard Problems Plague Apple) have plagued Apple. While they represent problems for Apple, they are certainly surmountable for a mega corporation. But a new development may not be so easy to repair: Multiple sources indicate that at least some 20 and 24 inch iMacs sold since their debut August 7, 2007 may have shipped with defective displays. The 20 and 24" iMacs, with the Mac OSX Tiger default desktop. A Closer Look At The 20" Display Issue Originally, there was some hope that the 20" issue may be dependant on the video card. Two video cards are available for the 20" iMac: ATI's 128 MB Radeon HD 2400 XT and 256 MB Radeon HD 2600 Pro. However, user reports have confirmed that the problem occurs regardless of the video card Compare Prices on Mac 20" Computers. The problem shows as a change in the display of colors from the top to the bottom of the iMac screen. When looking at the display from a typical front viewing angle a solid colored background appears normal at the top of the screen and gradually changes color as your eye approaches the bottom of the screen. At the bottom of the display, the color appears faded or washed out. Medium blue becomes light blue, and light colors become white. A You Tube video, posted by a Mac owner whose retailer refuses to accept a return of his iMac, illustrates the problem: (iMac screen washed out). Note that the issue is inherent to the display; it occurs regardless of whether you are using the Tiger or Leopard operating system. For that matter, you could be running Windows or Linux on the iMac, and the malfunction would still be there. Although this type of problem may not be serious to someone who uses their Mac for sending emails and browsing the Web, it is likely to be a serious issue to anyone who uses their Mac for such tasks as photo editing or graphic design. And keep in mind that the Mac is marketed primarily as a multimedia platform. As someone who spends a great deal of time using his computer for multimedia work, I would find a display in this condition unusable. You may wonder why users don't notice the problem before buying their iMacs. First, many iMacs are purchased from the Apple website. However, even when looking at an iMac display in a retail store, the issue is not immediately obvious, because iMacs are displayed with colorful desktop graphics. Until you become suspicious that something isn't right and confirm it by using a solid colored desktop, you won't notice that there's anything wrong. And that usually doesn't happen until your iMac is at home or in your office. Both OSX Tiger (previous image) and OSX Leopard (above) have default desktops that make the screen defect hard to detect. Bright retail store lighting may further complicate in-store detection. Join our discussion on this article!
-
We Interview EFiX Creators: OS X on PC
It’s no secret that enthusiasts have been trying (with some success) to get Apple’s operating systems to run on standard PCs. With Apple’s switch to Intel processors, the attempts to get Mac OS X running on non-Apple branded hardware became even more popular — and there was no more need to have an emulator running. In the last year, several attempts at getting OS X to run on standard PC hardware were being tackled by two companies that offered to sell Mac clones. The first was Psystar, which is now in a legal battle with Apple. Psystar actually claims that it has the upper hand in the case, although we doubt that it would walk away from the court room hands free. The other company, which launched in Europe, was Open System. This company however, didn’t last very long, looked shady, and offered to sell itself in whole for a measly $50,000. Obviously the intent was to create hype for a lost cause and then sell off the idea, make a quick buck, and disappear. The unfortunate problem with both these companies — one of them obviously questionable — is that they both attempt to circumvent the Apple EULA. Both companies tried to sell fully built systems that bundled with hacked versions of OS X Leopard, essentially selling Mac clones, and as we all know, there aren’t any licensed makers of Mac clones. Then a small company came along and introduced something called the EFiX. A small USB-based device, the EFiX connects to a motherboard’s internal USB header, and transforms it into a nearly authentic Mac system. By nearly, we mean the EFiX actually tricks a retail copy of Leopard into thinking that it’s been installed on a real Mac. With this setup, users don’t have to patch their operating systems nor do they have to worry about crippling their setup due to a system update from Apple. The simple installation process accompanied with the reassurance that everything runs as it does on real Mac hardware, makes things really attractive for those who want to avoid the costs of buying Apple hardware but want to run Leopard. I had the chance to sit down with Davide Rutigliano, CEO of Art Studios Entertainment, the company behind the EFiX device. I questioned him on the legality of the product as well as many technical aspects on just how the device works. Read on.









It works, and it's worth it.
Gentlemen, start your attorneys.
I see nothing unfortunate. I must be in the minority of pc enthusiasts.
Didn't psystar get caught a while ago simply ripping off open source projects and selling them as their own?
psystar has always seemed a little shady, but I give them credit for sticking it to apple. If apple wanted such exclusivity, they should have stuck to their own hardware instead of copying windows machines.
That was EFI-X...
props for them sticking it to the man
I smell a law suit..... Tomorrows story "Apply Sues Psystar Over Patent Infringing Software".
If apple wanted such exclusivity, they should have stuck to their own hardware instead of copying windows machines.
That is one of the stupidest statements that I have heard in quite sometime. Copying Windows machines? The Apple I was the first with a single circuit board used in a computer. The first home computer with a GUI or graphical user interface was the Apple Lisa. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak made the first ready-made personal computer. The Apple II was one of the first computers with a color display. The Apple Newton MessagePad is one of the first-ever Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) - a term coined by Apple's then-CEO John Sculley. Then there is the iPod and all of the "firsts" that came with it.
So what is it that Apple is copying from the "PC"?" Please don't say the OS.
pple was the company that made personal computing affordable and they have always been knocked for being so proprietary. If you are referring to the OS, well you need to read about the OS wars and learn who stole what from whom.
I'm running AMD machines... Damn!
As much as I dislike Apple, I do want to learn how to use OS X cheaply.
Gentlemen, start your attorneys.
So true and so sad. Who the hell Apple is to tell me what I can install or not in MY hardware!? If I paid for it, I can do as much as I want to with it.
OSX Server can be run in a VM. but that probably wont be cheap though... But if your running an AMD chip with virtualization support it's possible.
Wow, $49 for the Psystar software and $29 for the OS. It's cheaper to try out Mac OSX than it is to try Windows 7.
NOTE: I would also like to point out that Tom's is currently conducting a poll regarding a Mac OS section in the forums.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/32340-12-forum
Good luck playing games like Modern warfare 2 and others. Graet for the business types I guess. OS X sucks for gamers.
Try the Chameleon Bootloader - it is free, and works like a real OS X machine with updates and not like a hackinstosh.
http://aserebln.blogspot.com/
For $78 I might buy an apple os.
After some quick searching I see this is not the first software that allows you to do this (although its probably a fair bit easier) Interesting to me, ultimately useless but I will play around with it
I'm running AMD machines... Damn!As much as I dislike Apple, I do want to learn how to use OS X cheaply.
Well you can still use typical Hackintosh like everyone else. At least it's somehow free.
How does Psystar expect to stay in business with such blatent lawsuit infringement. At least EFI-X stood a chance because it wasn't made "exclusively" to install OSx on PCs, it just gave you the option to. Course EFI-X also stole from open source communities.
does it run on atom?
That is one of the stupidest statements that I have heard in quite sometime. Copying Windows machines? The Apple I was the first with a single circuit board used in a computer. The first home computer with a GUI or graphical user interface was the Apple Lisa. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak made the first ready-made personal computer. The Apple II was one of the first computers with a color display. The Apple Newton MessagePad is one of the first-ever Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) - a term coined by Apple's then-CEO John Sculley. Then there is the iPod and all of the "firsts" that came with it.So what is it that Apple is copying from the "PC"?" Please don't say the OS.pple was the company that made personal computing affordable and they have always been knocked for being so proprietary. If you are referring to the OS, well you need to read about the OS wars and learn who stole what from whom.
Apple has been an innovative company, but they're as guilty as MS of borrowing tech they liked. The entire basis of the Mouse centric GUI was "borrowed" from Xerox... which makes it pretty funny when Apple fanboi's talk about Gates stealing the tech from Apple.
OS wise... Apple has been ahead sometimes and behind other times. They were still running coop multitasking when OS/2 had been preemptive for years and even Microsoft had NT out.
IMO the biggest contribution Apple has made to the industry is the notion that PC's don't need to be ugly grey boxes.
Why would you buy a product to install any operating system on a PC when those products are already available for free?
Yes, because MS owns intel, nvidia, and AMD...
Except they don't. Why don't you start getting mad at the Wii and PS3 for 'copying windows machines'. And also they didn't use there own hardware before the intel switch. Their CPU's were from IBM, their graphics were from ATI and Nvidia.
is this like bringing in a picky mother in law MA-COSX (yah read it slowly).. to my humble house which hosts my wife (Vistie) who's bumming around watching soaps all day eating bonbons i mean memory like a hog. while I have fun making out with our can DO IT ALL MADE (SUSE) in laundry room downstairs? can someone not open the door when she arrives plz?
If apple wanted such exclusivity, they should have stuck to their own hardware instead of copying windows machines.
Its not "copying windows machines." Its using the most cost-effective hardware options--a decision that is the same for all PC vendors. Apple tried to be independent, but gave up after Motorola kept sucking so much at producing the PPC chips.
I think this is great. I would love to dual boot a PC--then we can do a comparative OS speed test and see if the OS speed results are correct.
Also.. there are some functional reasons to dual boot- you could do design in OS X and switch to windows for outlook/gaming.
1 way licensing agreement not really valid, because the user buys the product effectively making the manufacturer agree for to the users use before the licensing can be approved on by the user.
im hoping to see a mac osx and win 7 speed comparison on this soon.... make sure that you don't update the mac drivers and the windows drivers are up to date and optimized. i want to see the results
and yet another mac story by marcus yam
[the hardware differences between Macs and PCs became minimal]
try to setup a 3 way SLI, or crossfire, install a Phenom II, atom, Thinsoft Betwin (without crashes), 6 SSD in RAID0. Please. Apple sucks.
The Apple I was the first with a single circuit board used in a computer.
One of the first. It was a bare single board computer costing about 700 1975 dollars.
The first home computer with a GUI or graphical user interface was the Apple Lisa.
Ripped off from Xerox - even the single button mouse. And a computer selling for 10,000 1982 dollars is hardly a "home" computer.
Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak made the first ready-made personal computer. The Apple II was one of the first computers with a color display.
Again, one of the first. TRS80 and Commodore PET were contemporaries. And Wozniak was the brains behind Apple. Jobs did the marketing, which admittedly was not difficult. We were all so hungry for computing power back then that you could easily sell just about anything that could add two binary numbers together.
The Apple Newton MessagePad is one of the first-ever Personal Digital Assistants (PDA) - a term coined by Apple's then-CEO John Sculley.
Yes, and it died.
So what is it that Apple is copying from the "PC"?" Please don't say the OS.
Everything but the OS - CPU, IDE and now SATA, USB, PCI and PCI-e.
Apple was the company that made personal computing affordable
Go to the online Apple Store and price the 8 GB memory upgrade for the 17" Macbook Pro. $1200.
and they have always been knocked for being so proprietary.
Proprietary? That's their way of maintaining control of their profit margins.
Didn't psystar get caught a while ago simply ripping off open source projects and selling them as their own?
Isn't Macintosh the same?
If I remember correctly, it's just BSD linux...
$50 for this is pure bullshit.
You already can put Macintosh on most PC platforms, the main limiting factor is the motherboard (if I remember correctly)...