MS Denies Profiting Directly From XP Downgrades
A Los Angeles woman last week filed a lawsuit against Microsoft seeking compensatory damages and class action status alleged that the software maker was reaping “tremendous profits” from Windows XP downgrades. But Microsoft denies that it profits from selling downgrades for its OS from 2001.
Microsoft has yet to officially comment on the lawsuit filed by Emma Alvarado, who bought a Lenovo PC and is upset by the $59.25 charge she had to pay to downgrade from Vista to XP, but company spokesman David Bowermaster wrote in an email, “Microsoft does not have a downgrade program. It does offer downgrade rights as part of some Windows Vista licenses, including Windows Vista Business purchased through the OEM channel.
“Microsoft does not charge or receive any additional royalty if a customer exercises those [downgrade] rights. Some customers may choose or need to obtain media or installation services from third parties to install the downgrade version.”
In other words, it seems that it Microsoft is absolving itself from accusations that it profits directly from XP downgrades. Of course, Microsoft still requires users to purchase a Windows Vista license, and one of the top-tier ones at that. Only Vista Business and Vista Ultimate licenses may downgrade to Windows XP Professional, which is a part of a complaint, which read, "Customers have been forced to purchase the most expensive version of [Windows XP] in order to 'downgrade' from the Windows Vista operating system."
Microsoft doesn’t offer downgrade options with the most popularly sold version of Windows Vista -- Home Premium. So, those who want to go with XP are immediately facing a more expensive version of Vista.
"Microsoft mandates that customers who want to downgrade to XP must purchase the license to Vista Business or Vista Ultimate," said Dell spokesman David Frink last December, in a ComputerWorld story. "[That's] typically about a $130 premium, though some retail outlets charge more."
Late last year, Dell tripled its Windows XP downgrade fee to $150, showing a further premium for the downgrade option.
Microsoft now plans to discontinue new licensing of Windows XP on July 31, 2009 (except for netbooks). With many expecting Windows 7 before the end of this year, it goes without saying that Microsoft would want to minimize the length of time it has to support three different generations of operating systems.
....
....
My components are fine, my PSU is fine, Everything is fine. Did tests for them all, but nooo.. nvlddmkm error.. plagues my system.. XP is the only fix but unfortunately I didn't buy XP and I don't feel like pirating the thing, nor do i want to buy it because I want my full 4Gb..
Rawr.
That error is a nvidia driver issue... well it isnt, but its more common on an nvidia platform.
The fix is a reinstall of Vista AFAIK
Tried it
Report it to NVIDIA. It has nothing to do with Windows Vista, it's a faulty driver issue. As for people downgrading to WinXP ... either don't buy a new machine or buy one with no operating systems installed and just install a copy of Windows XP with your legit keys and you're good to go. People need to think outside the box. Downgrading is not a right, it's a privilege. I for one, have no problems with Vista and Server 2008.
That is an Nvidia driver problem. A fix I read is underlocking the GPU memory by 20Mhz.
Can't really blame Microsoft for Nvidia and their crap drivers.
In order to understand downgrade rights, you first have to understand what the COA (Certificate of Authenticity) on the bottom or back of the machine grants you. Any machine that runs windows, and purchased via a large manufacturer like Lenovo, Dell, HP, etc requires a COA. The COA is considered the base hardware license for windows that follows that machine till it is sent to the pc graveyard.
Under typical licensing in the corporate environment, a COA has to be present even if your company has a volume license holder/Enterprise Agreement/software assurance with Microsoft. The ability for a company, school, etc to install windows with their own native install from scratch is considered an "upgrade" by Microsoft. Now, point to make - the volume licensing is cheaper per seat than a retail copy of the same OS... That's why when you buy retail XP/Vista or if you buy one of the system builder or "OEM" copies off of new egg, it has a different cost structure.
So, along comes Vista, and under standard MS licensing terms, a Volume install of XP would typically not be legit even with the Vista COA. MS amended the rules for that and made an exception for downgrading to xp and still being compliant with MS licensing terms.
This downgrade offereing was primarily and still is targeted at businesses that still want to run XP. Unfortunately, the consume felt they also fell into the same boat.
The mistake made by consumers is in assuming the the downgrade rights grant them a free copy of the XP install for that PC. It does not. A consumer who has a full retail copy of XP or system builder copy doesn't even fall into the downgrade rights category anyway as those are considered fully licensed stand alone installs based on their price structure.
So, if a consumer wants XP instead of vista, they can call the vendor they bought the system from, and that vendor will charge them for the XP recovery media, and shipping.
MS and the vendors are doing absolutely nothing wrong here. The only thing wrong is how little people understand about that dang COA.
The problem is with Vista and it does NOT just happen with nVidia cards. This problem has been around since Vista first came out and has still not been addressed. It is a ridiculous problem to still be around. It has to do with how Vista communicates with hardware. Vista wants video cards to respond back to it within 2 seconds if I remember correctly. If video cards do not respond back, even if there is NO problem what so ever, then Vista automatically tries to restart the driver. This in turn causes a user's system to become crap if they do anything 3D related (I believe video viewing is also effected but I can not remember for sure). Any time a user initiates one of these programs/games the program/game crashes or hangs because of the driver restart. It is one of Vista's glamorous features that is supposed to benefit users by the way it handles hardware in an improved manner over XP.
even though everyone know this is BULLSHIT!
leave it to Micro$oft to be able to profit without getting caught
you didn't try another motherboard!!!!!!!!!
you didn't try another motherboard!!!!!!!!!
you didn't try looking for an updated bios!!!!!
or did you?
as for the downgrade issue the average computer user wouldn't care what OS is on there new PC or would care but is too uninformed to do anything about it. and because of this minority they have to charge a special fee to downgrade
And the sheep are not blaming Vista it IS Vista. The sheep are the ones with their noses up Vista's rear end. You blaming people's hardware is like blaming webmaster's web sites for not being up to Internet Explorer's own unique Microsoft specifications when it is Microsoft themself who ignores industry standards on a regular basis because they are Microsoft and do not care. They just create their own standards when the whim strikes them. And that is a fact not speculation.
Ha hahahahaaa And if the sheep sits where it I mean if the shoe fits where it
Thats why I skipped buying Vista because of the way it manipulates the drivers and hardware But I gues thats what happens when you start to fully automate your computer drivers with Vista
Most computer building stores just use windows drivers and dont bother with the drivers that come with the hardware that they are installing
anyway I hope windows 7 is better