Nvidia ‘Big Bang II’ Close to Release?
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (33) |
- Share
Back in August, Many rumor sites noted that Nvidia’s ForceWare 180 drivers will introduce several major changes.
The 180 ForceWare release has been dubbed the release as “Big Bang II” in reference to the “Big Bang” release that introduced SLI support.
According to the rumors, the drivers were to make an appearance in September, however that is obviously not the case now. BUT, VR-Zone has posted a bunch of screenshots, apparently showing the ForceWare 180 driver control panel in action. You can view VR-Zone’s gallery here.
We all know that screenshots are easy to fake, but these ones at VR-Zone appear to be authentic. On a system containing dual GeForce GTX 280 cards and a pair of 22” displays, the drivers provide two novel options – A PhysX configuration page and settings for multiple displays in SLI mode. Currently, PhysX options reside in a separate control panel application, and enabling SLI involves the user manually switching to single-display mode. Essentially, there is no true SLI multi-monitor support. The multi-monitor section of the ForceWare 180 control panel shows what appears to be both dual-view and cloning modes.
You can see a warning on the control panel that says “Cloning the SLI focus display will reduce performance for fullscreen applications.”
There have been no new rumored release dates as of current, but some people believe it is going to be very soon.
Source : Tom's Hardware
- NVIDIA'S Big Bang II coming soon [Graphic & Displays]
- 3 monitors, solutions? recommendations? [Graphic & Displays]
- Quad sli 295 GTX The most powerful setup available [Graphic & Displays]
- Control Panel [Graphic & Displays]
- ATI/AMD driver stability [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Best offers
|
Radeon HD 4670 Video Card (1GB,... | $69.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $134.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Video Card (1GB,... | $199.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce GTS 250 Video Card (1GB,... | $199.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Radeon HD 5870 Video Card (1GB,... | $409.99 Newegg.com More info |
ATI Radeon HD 5570: Reasonable Gaming Performance For $80?
AMD rounds out its DirectX 11-capable lineup with an entry-level gaming card sporting all of the Radeon HD 5000-series' value-adds. Does the Radeon HD 5570 represent the perfect combination of low-price, gaming performance, and features? Read More
-
ATI Radeon HD 5450: Eyefinity And HTPCs For Everyone?
Spoiler alert: ATI's Radeon HD 5450 is the first DirectX 11 card we've seen with outright poor gaming performance. But with its low price tag, does this Radeon deliver solid value to the masses, or should you be setting your sights a little bit higher? Read More
-
2D, Acceleration, And Windows: Aren't All Graphics Cards Equal?
2D is something we take for granted when we're shopping for a new GPU. But if you do a lot of work on your desktop (and don't we all?), it bears a little more attention. We spent some time testing 2D performance and came up with some surprising results. Read More
All performance charts
- New Catalyst 8.10 Drivers Bring Fan Speed Control
- Asus Launches 'Dark Knight' Graphics Cards
- Hackers Use Nvidia GPUs to Crack WiFi
- set up multiple displays nvidia
- setting up multiple displays nvidia
- sli multiple displays
- physx control panel
- setting up multiple displays
- set up multiple displays
- how to set up multiple displays gtx 280
- nvidia control panel application
- nvidia sli multimonitor
- nvidia control panel dualview or clone
- multiple display performance nvidia
- games support multimonitor
- nvidia control panel dualview
- nvidia control panel cloning displays not
- dual controller clone mode








big bang II my a** this doesn't do anything... its just a naming scheme... they should have already added support for multi monitor sli support...
they are losing and they know it now they are just bull sh*ting to try to win customers back... (losing this generation war atleast... maybe not overall)
178.10 beta for Vista x64
The forceware 177's have finaly fixed a long standing DirectDraw bug with the Infinity engine and the GeForce8 series, Planescape Torment, Baldur's gate, etc.
With hardware settings, you would get black instead of transparent, ugly. Changed to software you got your transparency back, but ugly mouse trails and slow performance. Now all is as it should be.
My point is there are thousand fixes big and small still to be done, keep picking up the loose bits like that DD bug as you press on relentlessly forward nVidia and you will keep your users!
i'd still take NVDA drivers over ATI Drivers anyday... except for if I ran Vista Pre SP1
beta drivers are already online
ati drivers are so much better... having owned both ATI drivers are much better...
that being said... i don't really care too much... but if the performance is similar... i know i'll be getting the ATI counterpart (like 5 %)
I will have to run some tests. before the 4870's game out my 8800GTX was hell(crash, freeze, poor performance on very old games) under Vista(and great under XP) and all I could do was blame MS(after all, it worked right in XP). One day for the fun of it I tried my old X1900XT(I was also doing some power consumption tests) and guess what? problems gone.
One 4870 later and its stayed gone(My girl friends computer missed its video card, it now lives with that 8800GTX anyway). But I would not mind testing the last 2 NV drivers that have been released as I did send bug reports and when I did that on XP it was always fixed on the next release(but that where so far appart some times).
The mounthly drivers for ATI is nice, good work on there part
I agree I'm not fanboy of any sort (I have nvidia 8600 in my laptop, 4850 in desktop) and currently ati drivers are much better. They release them monthly that shows they work hard on them to make out lives easier. Also their numbering thing is much easier to follow (8.8, 8.9, 8.10) not like nvidia and their 1xx.xx scheme...it just makes my head hurt
I have an opposite experience. My pc bsod'd daily with my x600xt, no matter what drivers. Its mysteriously dissappeared when i got my 8500GT pos edition.
haha they are losing? take a long look at sales and come back and comment...
I have an opposite experience. My pc bsod'd daily with my x600xt, no matter what drivers. Its mysteriously dissappeared when i got my 8500GT pos edition.
pretty much same here. different cards but same experience. i will risk another ATI purchase at some point but there is no compelling reason for me to right now.
dude... where have you been the last 5 f*cking months?
the 4870 series is f*cking raping nvidia... sure they may have a lot more market share but they are losing fast... try not to be an imbecile next time you post
Do not get me wrong(not trying to start a fight here), inf modded GTX 280 drivers had a lot of bug fixes for the 8800GTX. There was still some odd ones, like radom crashes while running tv out and gaming on the main screen. Quake 1 being limited to 800x600 was another odd one, with old drivers it ran 1280x1024 but had real bad performance. Come on... Quake 1(this was the one i blamed Vista on, but i was wrong....)
Yeh too little too late Nvidia, I just ordered a ATI 4870 1 gb card to replace my aging 8800 gts 640 card. Its been nice but its time to move on!
4870 raping the GTX 280, what benchmarks are you looking at? The only game I see the ATI higher is WiC.
I like to voice my opinion when I know nothing of what I'm arguing about. I feel I win more that way...........^^
The ati-nvidia fanboys can argue all day long about who's raping who. But when it's all said and done its the dollar that decides who's on top. As far as I can tell the 4870 has been selling like hotcakes over the gtx280
Quote from PC_68
"4870 raping the GTX 280, what benchmarks are you looking at? The only game I see the ATI higher is WiC."
I think he meant in sales & price range the 4870 holds over the 280.
Also the 4870 1gb cards are doing better than the 512mb cards in the higher resolutions also.
dude... where have you been the last 5 f*cking months?the 4870 series is f*cking raping nvidia... sure they may have a lot more market share but they are losing fast... try not to be an imbecile next time you post
why do they let people like you post? you get all personal and throw a tantrum because people don't see things your way. i actually do own cards from both and i am convinced you are just claiming to even ever own anything nvidia to strengthen your one dimensional mindset. i see there are many others to take up your position which is fine. somebody has to shill. hopefully the uneducated can see through it but if not, they will have some beautiful ATI space heaters this winter.
4870 raping the GTX 280, what benchmarks are you looking at? The only game I see the ATI higher is WiC.
Exactly. Even the X2 doesn't beat the GTX 280 in all cases (due to being a dual GPU card).
ATI is kicking Nvidia's ass at performance for the Money, but they don't have the most powerful single GPU card.
well come on..that x2 is a beast of a card. it runs hot but if your willing to throw down 450+ for a graphics card, then you are most likely willing to throw some water blocks on it and never worry about it again. its faster. face it.
The point being made isn't about absolute performance. The AMD/ATi 4800 series has a better price/performance ratio and is selling better than nvidia's GTX 200 series because of it.
yes. most people wanting to have the best do not necessarily bargain hunt though. in the case of video cards, the prices are pretty close thanks to ATI marketing something competitive. if you have a preference of a specific technolofy or brand over another, price is a moot point unless you are talking hundreds of dollars.
big bang II my a** this doesn't do anything... its just a naming scheme... they should have already added support for multi monitor sli support...they are losing and they know it now they are just bull sh*ting to try to win customers back... (losing this generation war atleast... maybe not overall)
Too bad everyone else knows ATi's owning of the crown will not last for long. Nvidia will win it back. They did it before after the 5800 vacuum cleaners they released.
Too bad everyone else knows ATi's owning of the crown will not last for long. Nvidia will win it back. They did it before after the 5800 vacuum cleaners they released.
and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati,and then ATI will own them, then they will own ati
Its a never ending loop
I hope it doesnt end ....it drives prices down on both cards.
nukemaster, your comment is total spam. But it is so true that I had to +1 it anyway.
Guys, did you see this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brG3-yyvv9Q
cause i don't like idiots
thats why roofus
It's more like "Big Fizzle 2"
After suffering though terrible 64-bit support on motherboards, and two nVidia chip blow ups (GTX7950 & an 8600) I'm done with nVidia. Folks like to blame Microsoft for Vista's issues, when it's obviously nVidia who's at fault. ATI's and Intel's products have more often for me and my friends come through time after time. Even when ATI has 1% less performance, I'll take them over buggy drivers and bad hardware design from nVidia from now on.