Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Windows 7 Release Candidate: Now What?

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US | B 54 comments

Now that it's at RC, what's next?

Now with the Windows 7 RC here, many of us are more confident than ever to run it as our primary OS – despite Microsoft telling us not to. The fact is that Windows 7 RC as it is feels like a complete OS, which gives Microsoft the confidence to commit to a release sometime this year.

So the next big step for Windows 7 is hitting the final release code that gets sent out to OEMs – release to manufacturing (RTM). The Windows 7 team has blogged about what the next steps are before we’ll be seeing the new OS shipping on new PCs as well as boxed copies on the shelves.

“The path to RTM starts with downloads of the RC. The RC is ‘done’ and what we are doing is validating this against the breadth of the ecosystem and with partners,” wrote the software engineering team. “The primary difference with the RC is that we will not be changing the functionality or features of the product at this point—that’s the sort of thing we’ll save for a future release.”  

Basically, the RC is feature complete and now all Microsoft is doing is collecting data from its now massive pool of testers to see where it can smooth things out for more systems.

“We are primarily focused on monitoring the behavior of the product through the telemetry, and of course making sure we did not introduce any regressions in any dimension from Beta quality,” the blog continued. “One of the things we have done since Beta has continued to beef up telemetry—we’ve put in additional monitoring points in many systems.  We’re particularly interested in seeing what devices are installed, drivers that are required, and overall system performance.”

All users of the Windows 7 RC right now are contributing to Microsoft’s data sets with reports regarding their usage (private and anonymous). In the final shipping version of the OS, the sending of telemetry data of Microsoft is optional.

Those using the RC right now and having a good experience likely won’t see much change in the final shipping version. Between now and the final release, Microsoft said that it is looking mainly to improve in the following areas:

  • Installation
  • Security issues
  • Crashes and Hangs
  • Device installation and compatibility
  • Servicing
  • New Hardware

“Delivering the highest quality Windows 7 is the most important criteria for us at this point—quality in every dimension.  The RTM process is designed to be deliberate and maintain the overall engineering integrity of the system.  Many are pushing us to release the product sooner rather than later, but our focus remains on a high quality release,” wrote Microsoft. “Ultimately our partners will determine when their PCs are available in market.  If the feedback and telemetry on Windows 7 match our expectations then we will enter the final phases of the RTM process in about 3 months.  If we are successful in that, then we tracking to our shared goal of having PCs with Windows 7 available this Holiday season.”

Display 54 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 13 Hide
    eklipz330 , May 15, 2009 1:13 AM
    deltatuxYou should NEVER run a testing operating system to be your primary system since you should be prepared to encounter bugs even if it's an RC release and the fact that it seems stable. I know this from experience as I test a lot of software in the open source community. It may look stable and then suddenly you do something then the program crashes... Then you go WTF?


    lol the funniest part is windows 7 rc is more stable than windows xp x64. so logically, your statement is correct, but just not in this situation
Other Comments
  • 2 Hide
    makotech222 , May 15, 2009 12:54 AM
    A new 7127 beta was leaked today i noticed. haha
  • -1 Hide
    deltatux , May 15, 2009 12:58 AM
    You should NEVER run a testing operating system to be your primary system since you should be prepared to encounter bugs even if it's an RC release and the fact that it seems stable. I know this from experience as I test a lot of software in the open source community. It may look stable and then suddenly you do something then the program crashes... Then you go WTF?
  • 3 Hide
    dafin0 , May 15, 2009 1:09 AM
    iv only got one system at my place but i could hardly resist testing out the beta and RC, but to be safe i just got my self a cheap 500gb hard drive and set up a dual boot.. to simple
  • 13 Hide
    eklipz330 , May 15, 2009 1:13 AM
    deltatuxYou should NEVER run a testing operating system to be your primary system since you should be prepared to encounter bugs even if it's an RC release and the fact that it seems stable. I know this from experience as I test a lot of software in the open source community. It may look stable and then suddenly you do something then the program crashes... Then you go WTF?


    lol the funniest part is windows 7 rc is more stable than windows xp x64. so logically, your statement is correct, but just not in this situation
  • -8 Hide
    cletus_slackjawd , May 15, 2009 1:23 AM
    how much for windows 7?
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , May 15, 2009 1:32 AM
    eklipz330lol the funniest part is windows 7 rc is more stable than windows xp x64. so logically, your statement is correct, but just not in this situation

    I agree. A lot of final versions of open software work less good (have more bugs) as Win7 RC.

    I expect the final verison of Windows 7 to be somewhat like 5GB in size. Since the current version has a lot of debug and tuning programs, and feedback programs) running that probably won't be there in the final versoin. At least if they do I hope we can strip them down from them.
    Despite their use in boosting the OS and provide more stability, once they have done their job, they are no longer needed and can be turned off.

    Also, I really hope MS is going to do something about defrag, to support better SSD defragmentation support, as well as keep the OS from spreading files arround the HD, but keep files and folders as clusters on the HD (together, and not spread out).
  • 0 Hide
    war2k9 , May 15, 2009 1:37 AM
    I can't wait for the retail release!
  • 0 Hide
    silversurfernhs , May 15, 2009 1:42 AM
    cletus.... you cant buy it yet...
  • -5 Hide
    roman praetorian , May 15, 2009 1:47 AM
    Does nobody else feel like windows 7 is vista ... but fixed?
  • 2 Hide
    silversurfernhs , May 15, 2009 1:52 AM
    kinda, but its satisfying
  • 0 Hide
    silversurfernhs , May 15, 2009 1:54 AM
    btw i cant find the 7127 in my regular resources
  • 6 Hide
    Sicundercover , May 15, 2009 2:20 AM
    7127 is a internal build. MS still does weekly builds. It doesnt mean there has been any major changes. It just consists of whatever work they did that week.

    It could be a very minor change and without release notes you would never know.

  • 0 Hide
    jsloan , May 15, 2009 2:42 AM
    w7 appears to be more stable than vista ever was...

    it certainly runs faster and ties up less resources...
  • 1 Hide
    Geibys , May 15, 2009 3:04 AM
    But does anyone notice a difference in loading times from start-up between the Beta (7000 build) to the RC (7100 build)?
  • 1 Hide
    afrobacon , May 15, 2009 3:04 AM
    Dub7 is easily the most stable version of windows I have used in a long time; I might actually go out any buy this one.
  • 8 Hide
    eklipz330 , May 15, 2009 3:14 AM
    ProDigit80I agree. A lot of final versions of open software work less good (have more bugs) as Win7 RC.


    the word you look for my sir, is worse
  • 0 Hide
    Tindytim , May 15, 2009 3:26 AM
    I'm glad the people at Microsoft are caving into the pressure to release Windows 7 earlier than they plan.
  • 0 Hide
    velocityg4 , May 15, 2009 3:29 AM
    I am using Win 7 as my primary OS without problems. No it is not my only OS. It is on a separate hard drive, by primary I simply mean it is what I am booting into and using day to day as I slowly install more programs to see if they all function. So far the only ones not to work do not work in Vista either, no surprises there.

    All of my data is kept on two separate hard drive. One of which has Vista and XP installed the other with Mac OS X Leopard. So though it is my primary OS now it is by no means my only OS. If Win 7 has some catastrophic failure I can simply hit the reboot button and use one of my other OSes.
  • 0 Hide
    JeBuSBrian , May 15, 2009 3:40 AM
    ProDigit80Also, I really hope MS is going to do something about defrag, to support better SSD defragmentation support, as well as keep the OS from spreading files arround the HD, but keep files and folders as clusters on the HD (together, and not spread out).
    Has it ever been proven that defragging an SSD even accomplishes anything?
  • -7 Hide
    starryman , May 15, 2009 4:22 AM
    Now what? Duh... another EU fine and biotch fest.
Display more comments