Overclocking Via OC Dial

Previous Next
2:00 AM - 08/27/2009 by Paul Henningsen

OC Dial

Besides ample multiplier and voltage adjustments in the BIOS, other “tweak–friendly” features of the 790FX-GD70 are the buttons and OC Dial located at the bottom of the board. The power and reset buttons are handy for those who run the board outside of a case, and just about any enthusiast can appreciate the recessed Clr CMOS button, rather than a conventional jumper. MSI’s OC Dial consists of the OC Drive knob and OC Gear button. These allow real-time adjustment to the reference clock.

The OC Dial function is enabled in the BIOS’s Cell menu. OC Dial Step increments can be increased if desired, but we used the default 1 MHz increments. OC Dial Value shows the changes made by turning the OC Drive knob. The Dial Adjusted Base Clock is the adjusted reference clock, and equals FSB Clock + OC Dial Value.

Again, we prepared the BIOS to overclock by lowering the NB and HT multiplier, as well as the memory ratio. OC Drive can be instantly adjusted while in the BIOS, but in the operating system the OC Gear button acts as an on/off switch. After pressing OC Gear for a second, the on-screen LED lights up and the OC Drive knob will then function. The knob has sixteen positions, allowing a reference clock increase of 16 MHz in one full rotation. Once adjustments are complete, pressing OC Gear again shuts down the feature, which we recommend to protect system stability.

We then began turning the OC Drive knob and watching the reference clock and frequencies change in CPU-Z. The system automatically rebooted after one of the changes. Upon entering the BIOS, we discovered that the crash occurred at the same 239 MHz reference clock that gave us trouble in AMD OverDrive.

After this minor hiccup, the system had no trouble booting into Windows at a 239 (200 + 39) MHz reference clock. We continued to increase the OC Dial value all the way to 65 MHz, the point where more voltage would then be needed to continue.

Voltages were increased and multipliers lowered. Back in Windows, we ratcheted up OC Dial in 10 MHz increments. The system crashed beyond a 286 MHz reference clock, and the OS failed to load if OC Dial Value was above 86 MHz.

After setting the CPU FSB frequency to 250 MHz, we rebooted back into the OS. This time the OC Dial could be increased all the way beyond our maximum fully stable overclock up to 288 MHz.

Talkback
stray_gator 08/27/2009 9:18 AM
Show
sohei 08/27/2009 10:56 AM
Hide
-13+

it's about how to squeeze all performance from an locked cpu .
this is a pro' article (head shot)

nzprogamer 08/27/2009 11:52 AM
Hide
-0+

im a big amd fans, good stuff here, look forward to go back to amd

amdfangirl 08/27/2009 12:50 PM
Hide
-5+

Good article! Too bad I killed my AMD CPU :P

brisingamen 08/27/2009 2:48 PM
Hide
-2+

great article, should be more like it,
and a few more gaming benches wouldnt hurt either guys!
speaking of headshots yes unreal tournament is probably the most important game to exemplify the value of overclocking and added framerates due to "headshots" and shtuff.

keep up the good work!

jtt283 08/27/2009 2:50 PM
Hide
-8+

stray_gator :
What's the point of using a high-end mobo to overclock a mainstream/value cpu?


Fair question; no one would likely do this IRL, but I think the point here was to see how high the locked CPU could go, so they used a premium mobo.
Paul, now that we know what this specific CPU can do, would it be useful to now put it on a more typical mainstream mobo and see what one might get from the same chip under more typical conditions?
The point would be to answer the following: if my budget just grew by $25, does it make more sense to buy a BE CPU or to get a more premium mobo?

haplo602 08/27/2009 3:37 PM
Hide
-7+

stray_gator :
What's the point of using a high-end mobo to overclock a mainstream/value cpu?



because value mobos vary in stability much more than premium mobos. this article was just about the CPU limit, not the mobo limit.

Anonymous 08/27/2009 3:43 PM
Hide
-0+

Tom's should do a shoot-out between an i7 920 and a 965BE that's had the multiplier taken down to 13x(2.6ghz), then both OCed to the max on the northbridge alone. I'm sure that would close the gap atleast somewhat, but I'm interested to see exactly how much. Maybe they could screw around with the HyperTransport multiplier as well, it might turn out that AMD has been shooting itself in the foot with the unlocked multiplier, when more performance would be had if they were forcing people to use the northbridge.

Shadow703793 08/27/2009 4:38 PM
Hide
-3+

Good write up; but PLEASE do NOT recommend OCing via Windows. Most pro's here will tell you that same thing. BIOS > Windows for OCing.

Shadow703793 08/27/2009 4:39 PM
Hide
-0+

Also how about putting this under WCing or DIce/LN2? :D

Ryun 08/27/2009 4:49 PM
Hide
-1+

In the performance gains and the cpu tweaking page the graphs for world in conflict are switched.

dirtmountain 08/27/2009 5:28 PM
Hide
-7+

Excellent article! Thank you for the work.

DarkMantle 08/27/2009 5:45 PM
Hide
-0+

Very good article!. Ryun is right, those 2 graphs for World in Conflict are switched.

Upendra09 08/27/2009 6:06 PM
Hide
-0+

I was planning on OCing but this article has made me afraid to OC, it seems there are a lot more factors involved in this than i thought.

saint19 08/27/2009 6:43 PM
Hide
-0+

Really good article, in the pass I has a X2 6400+, and only can overclok 100MHz....now with the 955 I have 600MHz more that the stock frecuency....

cybot_x1024 08/27/2009 7:40 PM
Hide
-0+

nice article.
Amd has really improved overclockability with the dragons.

Anonymous 08/27/2009 8:27 PM
Show
bustapr 08/27/2009 8:36 PM
Hide
-2+

wow great increases fom a triple core. 2.6 to 3.7 is great!

Anonymous 08/27/2009 8:39 PM
Hide
-7+

Shreder: You are a perfect example of a brainwashed sheep. Core i7 has been shown to have a definite advantage in:

Video Rendering(I don't care, maybe you do)
Synthetic Benchmarks(yawn)
Specific games that have been "optimized"(rigged) to perform better on an i7

Other than that, the advantage ranges from neglible to non-existant. Unfortunately, there are people like you who swallow every bit of the fanboy articles with cherry-picked benchmarks...

Boxa786 08/27/2009 9:29 PM
Hide
-0+

Like Shadow said, its obviously a really good cpu, for overcloking from amd,

lets see how high it can go ;D


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Well, so far I've only talked about Intel CPUs. These CPUs are in the majority, but there are also CPUs from Cyrix, IBM and AMD. What about overclocking these? Because Cyrix, IBM, and AMD have always lagged behind Intel and its Pentium CPUs in terms...

  • We did try to overclock our Radeon 3850 AGP to see if we could squeeze any extra performance out of it. We were quite keen to demonstrate if the AGP 3850 could keep up with its 3870 cousin at identical clock speeds, to further examine if the AGP bus...

  • Last month, we reviewed the Monarch Hornet Pro with an AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 at stock speeds, with specially overclocked graphics cards from EVGA. Interestingly, we can see how the new AMD CPU overclocked plays into game performance when we compare...

All about CPU
 Latest CPU articles
All CPU articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
Ads

Sponsored links