AES-NI Performance Analyzed; Limited To 32nm Core i5 CPUs
Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra 2009 SP3
The ALU and MFLOPS benchmarks don’t return surprising results. The quad-core is almost twice as fast due to threading optimizations, despite its lower clock speed—as expected.
The encryption score is entirely different. This overall result says that the Clarkdale-based Core i5 with AES acceleration is nearly three times faster than a Core i7-870 quad-core.
This is why the encryption score looks so great. Plain AES-256 encryption is more than six times faster on the hardware-accelerated dual-core processor.
The SHA-256 encryption test proves that the feature only accelerates AES.
Of course, the Lynnfield design sports an on-die memory controller, while Clarkdale's memory controller is on-package, on the 45nm graphics core. As a result, its memory bandwidth is markedly lower.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra 2009 SP3
Prev Page Test Setup And Benchmarks Next Page Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage Communications Test