Are Three Cores Better Than Two?
Table of contents
- 1. The Opteron Multicore Mixup
- 2. Get Ready For Multi Processing
- 3. It Works! Sort Of
- 4. Test Setup
- 5. Benchmark Settings
- 6. Benchmark Results
- 7. Audio
- 8. Applications, Continued
- 9. Synthetic, Continued
- 10. Conclusion

For AMD and Intel, it is just a matter of time before single-core processors become a thing of the past. The future thus belongs to devices that might pack two or eventually more than a dozen physical processing units onto a single physical die. However, it is a common assumption that processor cores have to come in even numbers, which is, in fact, not the case.
When we compared a dual-core and a dual-processor system, we first mentioned the possibility that the two might work. IBM's processor for the Xbox 360 is a triple core, which is a pretty good indicator that this configuration is viable. Although the power requirements are clearly different, there is, after all, no difference between single- and dual-core processors.
For our dual-core and dual-processor article, we used an Asus K8N-DL Socket 940 dual Opteron motherboard. For the processors, we used the same single- and dual-core Opterons from our previous project. Both the Opteron 248 and 275 run at 2.2 GHz, with the latter being the dual-core product.

Latest CPU News
- 05/20 – Intel To Support Cheap Ultrabooks With Low-Cost Celerons
- 05/18 – Japanese Galaxy S III to Pack 2GB of RAM, Dual-core CPU
- 05/15 – Report: Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 in Short Supply
- 05/14 – Intel Phases Out Remaining Nehalem Processors
- 05/11 – Intel's Otellini Jabs ARM Over Legacy Support in Windows RT
Latest CPU reviews
- 05/18 – Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- 05/15 – AMD A10-4600M Review: Mobile Trinity Gets Tested
- 05/14 – Core i7-3720QM: Ivy Bridge Makes Its Mark On Mobility
- 04/23 – Intel Core i7-3770K Review: A Small Step Up For Ivy Bridge
- 03/06 – Intel Xeon E5-2600: Doing Damage With Two Eight-Core CPUs