- graphic card benchmark
- graphics card benchmarks
- graphics card benchmark
- cpu charts 2009
- graphic cards benchmark
- graphics cards benchmarks
- graphic card benchmarks
- graphics card charts
- cpu chart 2009
- graphics cards benchmark
- graphic cards benchmarks
- graphic card charts
- graphics card comparison 2009
- toms hardware graphics chart
- best gaming graphics card 2009
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
Sponsored links
Gaming Graphics Charts For 2009: Updated!
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (82) |
- Share
Table of contents
- 1 – New Benchmarks, Reference Cards, And Retail Products
- 2 – Seven Games for Testing Graphics
- 3 – Games, Continued
We began our testing for this year's updated charts with the newest and fastest graphics cards available from ATI and Nvidia. Right now, you can compare 32 retail products and graphics chip classes to one another; detailed performance results are available from 30 different gaming benchmark environments.
From here on out, the graphics charts will be updated on a monthly basis as we introduce additional cards (reference and retail) at every price point. All our benchmarks here are new, whether you're looking at the Mainstream or High-End categories.
To provide the best possible performance picture, all of the graphics products are measured first at their standard clock rates. This year we aren't restricting these charts to reference models: you'll find commercially-available products, special editions, and overclocked versions from all the well-known vendors for comparison, too.
This is how Tom’s Hardware tracks the graphics card market closely and carefully, where vendors are always changing clock rates, cooling solutions, and various other design details so that they can improve upon the performance available from basic reference cards.
Our new Benchmark Suite includes another large collection of different games and 3D engines. Our goal is to represent a broad mix of real-time strategy, simulation, role-playing, and FPS games in these results. For some time now, state-of-the-art graphic cards have offered enough performance for fluid game play on most monitors, even at resolutions up to 1920x1200 (a bit higher than standard HD resolution). That’s why we’ve raised the bar in this year’s charts for our test resolutions: High-End now starts at 1680x1050 resolution with anti-aliasing (AA) enabled. That’s because lower resolutions run smoothly across the board, and are more likely to be limited by CPU (rather than GPU) performance.
At a resolution of 1920x1200, the biggest differences become visible, so we feature three different test variations for this case. First, there's a test with anti-aliasing turned off (so that we can record the most playable frame rates). We also test with 4xAA to improve image quality somewhat (and to better tax the more powerful graphics cards). Finally, we test with 8xAA to most accurately distinguish between otherwise-subtle differences in clock speeds, graphics chip classes, and frame buffers on high-end cards.
| Benchmark Suite 2009 | DirectX | Standard | Quality | 8xAA | 3D Engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fallout 3 | DX9 | 0xAA+0xAF | 4xAA+8xAF | 8xAA+15xAF | Gamebryo (Oblivion) |
| Far Cry 2 | DX10 | 0xAA+0xAF | 4xAA+8xAF | 8xAA+16xAF | Dunia Engine |
| F.E.A.R 2 | DX10 | 0xAA+0xAF | 4xAA+8xAF | LithTech Jupiter Extended (EX) | |
| Left 4 Dead | DX9 | 0xAA+0xAF | 4xAA+8xAF | 8xAA+16xAF | Source Engine (Halflife 2) |
| The Last Remnant | DX10 | 0xAA+4xAF | 0xAA+4xAF | Unreal 3 | |
| Tom Clancy's Endwar | DX10 | 0xAA+0xAF | 4xAA+8xAF | Unreal 3.1 | |
| Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X | DX10 | 0xAA+0xAF | 4xAA+8xAF | Ubisoft Bukarest (Blazing Angels) | |
| 3DMark06 v1.1.0 | DX9 | 1280x1024 | Default | Default | Futuremark |
Best prices for tested products
- Gaming Graphics Charts Error [Tom's Hardware Forum related]
- Gaming Graphics Charts [Graphic & Displays]
- Hardware used for Graphics Charts? [Graphic & Displays]
- Question about graphics card charts on toms hardware [Graphic & Displays]
- 8800 GTS? for MS Flight SimX. But which??? [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 5
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Quad or Dual CPU for Gaming?
- Processors 3.6ghz sweet spot
- Corsair 650TX PSU work with dual Radeon 4870 1GB 256-bit GDDR5?
- Getting most out of quad core
- FSX CPU quandry, E or Q?
- How much the life of the cpu is shortened with higher voltages?
- Building new computer, must have help
- Upgrading system Motherboard suggestion.
- GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3R, ASUS P5B, or something else?
- Red Hot VGA Charts!
- Building budget gaming system,,please need opinions
- P5GDC-V CDROM bootable when connect to ITE
- Monitor port?? K8V-SE DLX
- My personal big list of parts
Related news
Related articles
-
Gaming Graphics Charts For 2009: Updated!
The 2009 Graphics Card Charts are here! New this year is an updated platform, reference and retail products (with overclocked/special edition boards), and an entirely new suite of benchmarks. Come compare the performance of your favorite cards!
-
The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the Money: March 2008
Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great - that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.
-
The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the Money: January 2008
Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great - that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.



bout dam time. but thanks, I had been waiting for this. Makes me feel better about the pair of GTX 275's about to go into my system.
Sweet new charts
Good stuff as usual,nice to the the more in depth high resolution tests.
I would like to see an oc'd gtx 260 on the charts sometime soon. Most of the oc'd cards have fallen in price below stock 4870 1 gig. I'd like to see how it compares.
Finally, they did it!
But wait, no Crysis or Warhead? Why?
I think this review is broken, i cannot get past "here's what we tested" there is no more links.
same here... about what mike989 said
As usual very very very fishy tests.
FINALLY!!!! I've been waiting for this for sooo long, Its been long overdue, but thx Tino and the crue, once again you re-grabed my attention and proved its worth visiting Toms!!!!
But wait, no Crysis or Warhead? Why?
Yeah, I'd would be nice if these were added, as Crysis is still one of the most taxing games...
I'm surprised the ATI cards fell behind in HAWX which is a game sponsored by AMD. And no Warhead or Crysis? I know Crysis is getting a old now but barring STALKER CLear Sky there isn't another game out there that pushes current hardware as hard as Crysis does. In fact my next video card is based on how well it can handle Crysis at 1920x1200 so I'm a bit disappointed to not see it's inclusion but I guess we have to move on at some point.
Overall good work, these charts are dead handy for quickly referencing a video cards potential.
These charts are great, but in the future if you guys have time, are SLI and Crossfire solutions going to be included in these results?
I think this review is broken, i cannot get past "here's what we tested" there is no more links.
Mike,
That's the end of the piece--it's only a four-pager to introduce the new charts. I put up a second story for today to make up for this one being so brief.
These charts are great, but in the future if you guys have time, are SLI and Crossfire solutions going to be included in these results?
Gell,
I do believe SLI and CrossFire will be added in a separate update.
Nice charts. But I disagree on some games choices..Two unreal engine gamess?!! And -admittedly- one of them has a FPS cap !!..No demanding games as GTA IV or crysis?!! Should have included one of them at least.
It would be helpful for say, CF results for 4890's, 4770's and whatnot. NEED CPU CHARTS!!!
Nice charts. But I disagree on some games choices..Two unreal engine gamess?!! And -admittedly- one of them has a FPS cap !!..No demanding games as GTA IV or crysis?!! Should have included one of them at least.
Avatar--I'll continue including GTA 4 in my standalone reviews for folks who still want to see numbers with this one.
Finally. What took you guys so long?
And please, also post a Vantage Performance preset score! We want benchies that fully use DX10.