The 8086 was the first x86 processor—Intel had already released the 4004, the 8008, the 8080 and the 8085. This 16-bit processor could manage 1 MB of memory using an external 20-bit address bus. The clock frequency chosen by IBM (4.77 MHz) was fairly low, though the processor was running at 10 MHz by the end of its career.
The first PCs used a derivative of this processor, the 8088, which had only an 8-bit (external) data bus. An interesting aside is that the control systems in the US space shuttles use 8086 processors and NASA was forced to buy some from eBay in 2002 since Intel could no longer supply them.
| Code name | N/A |
| Date released | 1979 |
| Architecture | 16 bits |
| Data bus | 16 bits |
| Address bus | 20 bits |
| Maximum memory | 1 MB |
| L1 cache | no |
| L2 cache | no |
| Clock frequency | 4.77-10 MHz |
| FSB | same as clock frequency |
| FPU | 8087 |
| SIMD | no |
| Fabrication process | 3,000 nm |
| Number of transistors | 29,000 |
| Power consumption | N/A |
| Voltage | 5 V |
| Die surface area | 16 mm² |
| Connector | 40-pin |
Previous
Next
Summary
- 8086: The First PC processor
- 80286: 16 MB Of Memory, But Still 16 Bits
- 386: 32-Bit and Cache Memory
- The 486: An FPU And Multipliers Too
- Intel Pentium: A Bothersome Bug
- Pentium Pro: The First To Handle Over 4 GB Of Memory
- Pentium II and III: Brothers
- Celeron and Xeon: Intel Aims At The High/Low End
- The Pentium III Hits 1 GHz
- The Pentium 4: A Lot Of Noise Over Very Little
- Pentium M: Laptops Flex Their Muscles
- Pentium 4 Gets 64-bit And Another Core
- The First Mobile Dual-Core
- Today's Hotness: The Core 2 Duo
- The Future: Nehalem, Atom, Etc.
Ask a Category Expert

Looking forward to the AMD article.
Core 2 Quad, has 4 cores and Core Solo has 1 core.
Yes there is a singal core,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors#Single-Core_Mobile_processors
Ok it is not under the same branding but it is part of the same microarchitecture
Thanks for the heads-up! I tweaked that passage to better represent the Core 2 architecture's available configurations!
Exactly. The article says:
There is no mention of the branding, so there is no actual error there, just misinterpretation.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116039
Yes, it isn't called a "Core 2 Duo," but it uses the Core architecture and only has a single core enabled.
But I will have to say, there aren't any 3 core models...
Anyway great article was like a trip down memory lane for me, first Intel CPU I got to use was a 8086 and wow it was slow (I was a kid with ADD give me a break lol) well maybe it was not slow and it was the floppy drive that killed me... Either way best game on it was Qbasic uugghh I think I remember it having CGA with a mighty 4 colors !! I had some paint program for it too.
So why is the Pentium 4 "unforgettable"?
Because it was a huge part of CPU history? IDK. Considering that it was not that bad until Prescott, which I am sad they didn't mention.
But the Pentium 4 will always be remembered in my eyes thanks to the Blue Man Group. Them and their crazy stuff.
Thats nice. Because this is obviously a competition.
No wait its not. Its just a nice walk down memory lane and they are going to do AMD next so no need for that.
I for one am suprised that they didn't include the Pentium 805. I remember reading how well that one OCed and when OCed it smoked the highest end available and it only cost $150 bucks.
Seriously why bring AMD into this? Its just nice memories not a comparison.
If the best you can say about it is "that it was not that bad," that would seem to indicate it wasn't particularly worth remembering.