- Radeon X1600 Pro: Prolonging the Graphics Life of Your AGP Machine
- GeForce 7950 GX2 - SLI on a Single Card
- Graphics Card Quiet: Gigabyte's Silent-Pipe II Cooling
- Maxing Out Your Graphics Card With Tomb Raider Legend
- ATI Buyer's Guide, Part III: All Graphics Cards!
- ATI Graphics Card Buyer's Guide 2006, Part II
- ATI Graphics Buyer's Guide Spring 2006, Part 1
- Can Matrox's TripleHead2Go Span Fun Across Three Displays?
- Nvidia Goes For Four: Quad SLI Gaming Dissected
- Is the KuFormula VF1 Plus the Magic Bullet for Graphics Cooling?
- Solidworks is killing me! What do I need to upgrade?
- Q Xeon and QE, which is better for me?
- Opinions on Alienware Laptops
- best CPU for a dedicated homebuilt workstation?
- 7950GX2, 7900GTX, or X1900XTX to go with C2D E6700???
- Best processor and vid card combo for Photoshop
- Optimum motherboard for a CAD workstation?
- OpenGL Workstation Graphics: Now We're Talking High End!
- does a server = workstation?
- Solidworks CAD Workstation PC Build - June 20 2008
OpenGL Workstation Graphics: Now We're Talking High End! : Introduction
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: opengl, workstation, graphics
Syndication:
Introduction

Clocks tick slower in the OpenGL workstation arena. In contrast to graphics cards aimed at gaming, no manufacturer would even think of chucking products onto the market every four months. Instead, they concentrate on the good old virtues of market maturity and stability. And that's a good thing too, because technically, the hardware for OpenGL graphics cards is no different from its gaming counterparts - the price is three time as high, though!
In order for product positioning to have the desired effect, they use an "independent" label (FireGL instead of Radeon) and modify the card's BIOS and a bit of microcode in the chip. This means that users cannot run FireGL drivers on a Radeon card, and vice versa. The drivers themselves have built-in "artificial brakes", meaning that a gaming card can never achieve decent values in the OpenGL arena - that's reserved for workstation cards. As an aside, both ATi and Nvidia use the same process to position their individual products.
So what justifies the enormous price difference? The majority of the costs result from customer support and driver development. No OpenGL workstation user is allowed to be left alone with his problems, where it's the complete opposite for the gamer. Additionally, it takes a long time before OpenGL drivers can be certified as "stable", so the manufacturers pass these increased costs on to the customer. Why does no-one complain? That's easy: workstations for engineers and designers make a considerable contribution to creating value in the production process. Procurement costs are of little importance, since the workstations are a business expense, and mostly pay for themselves within a short time.
Now that 3Dlabs has stopped producing OpenGL cards, there are only two manufacturers left: the big boys, ATI and Nvidia. The THG lab in Munich tested the current FireGL boards V7350 and V7300 from ATi; the competing product from Nvidia is called the Quadro FX 4500, and although it is not exactly the newest product around, it can still hold its own, as our tests show.
Join our discussion on this topic
- Next page Test Candidates In Detail