Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Signin with

Test Setup And Overclocking Table

by
System Hardware
HardwareDetails
Performance Benchmarks
Motherboard (Socket AM3)Asus Crosshair IV Formula (Rev. 1.0)
Chipset: AMD 890FX, BIOS: 0505 (04/02/2010)
Motherboard (LGA 1366)Intel DX58SO (Rev. 1.0)
Chipset: Intel X58, BIOS: 5000 (02/16/2010)
Motherboard (LGA 1156)Gigabyte P55A-UD7 (Rev. 1.0)
Chipset: P55, BIOS: F4
CPU AMD IAMD Phenom II X6 1090T (45 nm, 3.2 GHz, 6 x 512KB L2 and 6MB L3 Cache, TDP 125W, Rev. C3)
CPU AMD IIAMD Phenom II X4 965 (45 nm, 3.4 GHz, 4 x 512KB L2 and 6MB L3 Cache, TDP 125W, Rev. C3)
CPU Intel IIntel Core i7-975 Extreme (45 nm, 3.33 GHz, 4 x 256KB L2 and 8MB L3 Cache, TDP 130W, Rev. D0)
CPU Intel IIIntel Core i7-980X Extreme (32 nm, 3.33 GHz, 6 x 256KB L2 and 12MB L3 Cache, TDP 130W)
CPU Intel IIIIntel Core i5-750 (45 nm, 2.66 GHz, 4 x 256KB L2 and 8MB L3 Cache, TDP 95W, Rev. B1)
DDR3 Memory3 x 2GB DDR3-1600 (Corsair TR3X6G-1600C8D 8-8-8-24)
GraphicsSapphire Radeon HD 5850
GPU: Cypress (725 MHz), Graphics RAM: 1,024MB GDDR5 (2,000 MT/s), Stream Processors: 1,440
Hard DriveWestern Digital VelociRaptor, 300GB (WD3000HLFS)
10,000 RPM, SATA 3Gb/s, 16MB Cache
Power SupplyPC Power & Cooling, Silencer 750EPS12V 750W
System Software & Drivers
Operating SystemWindows Ultimate x64
Updated on 2010-03-03
Drivers and Settings
Intel Chipset DriversChipset Installation Utility Ver. 9.1.1.1025
Intel Storage DriversMatrix Storage Drivers Ver. 8.​9.​0.​1023

 

Audio Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmark
Details
iTunes
Version: 9.0.3.15
Audio CD ("Terminator II" SE), 53 min.
Convert to AAC audio format
Lame MP3
Version 3.98.3
Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min.
convert WAV to MP3 audio format
Command: -b 160 --nores (160 Kbps)
Video Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmark
Details
Handbrake CLI
Version: 0.94
Video: Big Buck Bunny (720x480, 23.972 frames) 5 Minutes
Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-channel, English
to
Video: AVC1 Audio1: AC3 Audio2: AAC (High Profile)
Mainconcept Reference v2
Version: 2.0.0.1555
MPEG-2 to H.264
MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec
28 sec. HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG-2)
Audio:
MPEG-2 (44.1 kHz, 2-channel, 16-bit, 224 Kbps)
Codec: H.264 Pro
Mode: PAL 50i (25 FPS)
Profile: H.264 BD HDMV
Application Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmark
Details
7-ZipVersion 9.1 beta
LZMA2
Syntax "a -t7z -r -m0=LZMA2 -mx=5"
Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload
WinRAR
Version 3.92
RAR
Syntax "winrar a -r -m3"
Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload
Winzip 14
Version 14.0 Pro (8652)
WinZip Commandline Version 3
ZIPX
Syntax "-a -ez -p -r"
Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload
Autodesk 3ds Max 2010Version: 10 x64
Rendering Space Flyby Mentalray (SPECapc_3dsmax9)
Frame: 248
Resolution: 1440 x 1080
Cinebench 11.5
Version 11.5 Build CB25720DEMO
CPU Test single and multi threaded
Adobe Photoshop CS 4 (64-Bit)Version: 11
Filtering a 16MB TIF (15000x7266)
Filters:
Radial Blur (Amount: 10; Method: zoom; Quality: good)
Shape Blur (Radius: 46 px; custom shape: Trademark sysmbol)
Median (Radius: 1px)
Polar Coordinates (Rectangular to Polar)
Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional
Version: 9.0.0 (Extended)
== Printing Preferenced Menu ==
Default Settings: Standard
== Adobe PDF Security - Edit Menu ==
Encrypt all documents (128-bit RC4)
Open Password: 123
Permissions Password: 321
Microsoft Powerpoint 2007
Version: 2007 SP2
PPT to PDF
Powerpoint Document (115 Pages)
Adobe PDF-Printer
Fritz
Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.3.2
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings
BenchmarkDetails
3DMark VantageVersion: 1.02 Patch 1901
Options: Performance
Graphics Test 1
Graphics Test 2
CPU Test 1
CPU Test 2
PCMark VantageVersion: 1.0.2.0 Patch 1901
PCMark Benchmark
Memories Benchmark
SiSoftware Sandra 2010Version: 2010.1.16.10
Processor Arithmetic, Cryptography, Memory Bandwith


Overclocking Table

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T3,200 MHz3,400 MHz3,600 MHz3,800 MHz4,000 MHz
Multiplier16x17x18x19x20x
Turbo (three cores)18x19x20x20x-
Base Frequency200 MHz200 MHz200 MHz200 MHz200 MHz
Turbo COREYesYesYesYesNo
System Idle Power83W83W85W85W125W
System Peak Power201W207W232W271W445W
Vcore1.325V1.325V1.4125V1.4875V1.55V
CPU-Z VT idle1.212V1.212V1.212V1.212V1.56V
CPU-Z VT load1.248V1.248V1.272V1.404V1.596V
Stable
Yes
YesYesYesNo
Overclocking TechniqueAMD OverDriveBIOS
Share:
63
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
wintermint 06/14/2010 6:13 AM
Hide
-13+

I hope Intel Fan go away because I don't want to hear about $1000 CPU when you can have these for 1/5 the price... affordable and efficient

darkpower45 06/14/2010 6:20 AM
Hide
-11+

if only intel would bring out a 32nm quad core already...

HansVonOhain 06/14/2010 6:20 AM
Hide
-8+

Great article. Need to do these article on more processors that are affordable to the masses.

duk3 06/14/2010 6:21 AM
Hide
-12+

Interesting article.
I am interested in seeing Bulldozer released.

Stardude82 06/14/2010 6:40 AM
Hide
--2+

Wow...AMD's silicon is pretty awesome and a hexa-core is a great thing to compete on the desktop, but when you look at the new i7 875K ($320), all arguments about platform aside, I don't think AMD's value lead here is all that clear. This doesn't even include your previous analysis the10-20% efficiency increase which overclocking the Lynnfields can yield.

lonepasserby 06/14/2010 7:38 AM
Hide
-10+

How long will AMD make us wait for Bulldozer? Serious fans would probably be suffocating right now by holding their breath for its release.

DjEaZy 06/14/2010 7:50 AM
Hide
-2+

... i bookmark this one... when i get my 1090T, this article will be usefull...

The Greater Good 06/14/2010 8:00 AM
Hide
-20+

FTFA:

Quote :Adding a dual-core Core i5 processor would probably have been appropriate from a pricing standpoint, but we doubt that the comparison would be very relevant.


I disagree. If I had 200 dollars to spend on a CPU, why do I need to know how a 1000 dollar CPU stacks up to a 200 dollar CPU? It's clearly out of my price rage. Showing a side-by-side comparison of what Intel offers and what AMD offer at the same price-point would be very relevant.

dragonfang18 06/14/2010 8:05 AM
Show
lothdk 06/14/2010 8:39 AM
Hide
-0+

What I would have found more interesting is a comparison between an overclocked 1090T and an overclocked i7 930 which costs approximately the same (unless you have access to microcenter and can get the i7 for $200).

joytech22 06/14/2010 8:40 AM
Hide
-11+

dragonfang18 :
ok... AMD 3.4Ghz for $300... Intel I7 920 $280 at 3.6Ghz.



You forgot to mention the i7 isn't stock..

welshmousepk 06/14/2010 8:49 AM
Hide
-17+

really wish they had included the 1055t in this article.

is it worth spending the extra 100 dollars when overclocking is taken into account?

zaodrze244 06/14/2010 9:06 AM
Hide
-10+

why not theres no tests results in games like GTA IV or Flight Simulator X, where the cores are heavily used. without this article is useless

_SirO_ 06/14/2010 9:07 AM
Hide
-0+

Could have added a performance / power chart with frequency increase

Lmeow 06/14/2010 9:16 AM
Hide
-0+

welshmousepk :
really wish they had included the 1055t in this article. is it worth spending the extra 100 dollars when overclocking is taken into account?



Probably not, but then some would argue the 1090T Black Edition might be higher binned and would be easier to overclock because of the unlocked multiplier.

Arock 06/14/2010 11:15 AM
Hide
-5+

Should include the 1055T...Can it same efficiency at 3.4Ghz like 1090T..?Then we can judge its efficiency & performance also..Y spend xtra 100$ if that performance we in 200$???

Reynod 06/14/2010 12:12 PM
Hide
-0+

What a great article.

I am stunned.

lukeeu 06/14/2010 12:20 PM
Hide
-4+

So running a CPU at 400W isn't stable huh?
I'd like to add that if you upgrade your AMD rig you don't have to spend extra 120$ on mobo and 150$ on new ram and Intel already announced that next cpu after i7 will have a new socket. I've found benchmarks that show phenom x2 gets only 2% performance hit while running on ddr2. Does anyone know the figures for X6?

Onus 06/14/2010 12:29 PM
Hide
-3+

This article tells me that the 1090T performs very well if you overclock it even a little; and that it has to be overclocked to do well. Great; if I buy one there's no way now that I won't overclock it. Now, please take an equivalently-priced Intel CPU+motherboard+RAM combo and overclock it to the same [non-extreme] degree. Then compare the performance and the value. Any possible fanboy differences aside, that will tell me which CPU to buy. Thank you.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK