| System Hardware | |
|---|---|
| Hardware | Details |
| Performance Benchmarks | |
| Motherboard (Socket AM3) | Asus Crosshair IV Formula (Rev. 1.0) Chipset: AMD 890FX, BIOS: 0505 (04/02/2010) |
| Motherboard (LGA 1366) | Intel DX58SO (Rev. 1.0) Chipset: Intel X58, BIOS: 5000 (02/16/2010) |
| Motherboard (LGA 1156) | Gigabyte P55A-UD7 (Rev. 1.0) Chipset: P55, BIOS: F4 |
| CPU AMD I | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T (45 nm, 3.2 GHz, 6 x 512KB L2 and 6MB L3 Cache, TDP 125W, Rev. C3) |
| CPU AMD II | AMD Phenom II X4 965 (45 nm, 3.4 GHz, 4 x 512KB L2 and 6MB L3 Cache, TDP 125W, Rev. C3) |
| CPU Intel I | Intel Core i7-975 Extreme (45 nm, 3.33 GHz, 4 x 256KB L2 and 8MB L3 Cache, TDP 130W, Rev. D0) |
| CPU Intel II | Intel Core i7-980X Extreme (32 nm, 3.33 GHz, 6 x 256KB L2 and 12MB L3 Cache, TDP 130W) |
| CPU Intel III | Intel Core i5-750 (45 nm, 2.66 GHz, 4 x 256KB L2 and 8MB L3 Cache, TDP 95W, Rev. B1) |
| DDR3 Memory | 3 x 2GB DDR3-1600 (Corsair TR3X6G-1600C8D 8-8-8-24) |
| Graphics | Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 GPU: Cypress (725 MHz), Graphics RAM: 1,024MB GDDR5 (2,000 MT/s), Stream Processors: 1,440 |
| Hard Drive | Western Digital VelociRaptor, 300GB (WD3000HLFS) 10,000 RPM, SATA 3Gb/s, 16MB Cache |
| Power Supply | PC Power & Cooling, Silencer 750EPS12V 750W |
| System Software & Drivers | |
| Operating System | Windows Ultimate x64 Updated on 2010-03-03 |
| Drivers and Settings | |
| Intel Chipset Drivers | Chipset Installation Utility Ver. 9.1.1.1025 |
| Intel Storage Drivers | Matrix Storage Drivers Ver. 8.9.0.1023 |
| Audio Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| Benchmark | Details |
| iTunes | Version: 9.0.3.15 Audio CD ("Terminator II" SE), 53 min. Convert to AAC audio format |
| Lame MP3 | Version 3.98.3 Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min. convert WAV to MP3 audio format Command: -b 160 --nores (160 Kbps) |
| Video Benchmarks and Settings | |
| Benchmark | Details |
| Handbrake CLI | Version: 0.94 Video: Big Buck Bunny (720x480, 23.972 frames) 5 Minutes Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-channel, English to Video: AVC1 Audio1: AC3 Audio2: AAC (High Profile) |
| Mainconcept Reference v2 | Version: 2.0.0.1555 MPEG-2 to H.264 MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec 28 sec. HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG-2) Audio: MPEG-2 (44.1 kHz, 2-channel, 16-bit, 224 Kbps) Codec: H.264 Pro Mode: PAL 50i (25 FPS) Profile: H.264 BD HDMV |
| Application Benchmarks and Settings | |
| Benchmark | Details |
| 7-Zip | Version 9.1 beta LZMA2 Syntax "a -t7z -r -m0=LZMA2 -mx=5" Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload |
| WinRAR | Version 3.92 RAR Syntax "winrar a -r -m3" Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload |
| Winzip 14 | Version 14.0 Pro (8652) WinZip Commandline Version 3 ZIPX Syntax "-a -ez -p -r" Benchmark: 2010-THG-Workload |
| Autodesk 3ds Max 2010 | Version: 10 x64 Rendering Space Flyby Mentalray (SPECapc_3dsmax9) Frame: 248 Resolution: 1440 x 1080 |
| Cinebench 11.5 | Version 11.5 Build CB25720DEMO CPU Test single and multi threaded |
| Adobe Photoshop CS 4 (64-Bit) | Version: 11 Filtering a 16MB TIF (15000x7266) Filters: Radial Blur (Amount: 10; Method: zoom; Quality: good) Shape Blur (Radius: 46 px; custom shape: Trademark sysmbol) Median (Radius: 1px) Polar Coordinates (Rectangular to Polar) |
| Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional | Version: 9.0.0 (Extended) == Printing Preferenced Menu == Default Settings: Standard == Adobe PDF Security - Edit Menu == Encrypt all documents (128-bit RC4) Open Password: 123 Permissions Password: 321 |
| Microsoft Powerpoint 2007 | Version: 2007 SP2 PPT to PDF Powerpoint Document (115 Pages) Adobe PDF-Printer |
| Fritz | Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.3.2 |
| Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings | |
| Benchmark | Details |
| 3DMark Vantage | Version: 1.02 Patch 1901 Options: Performance Graphics Test 1 Graphics Test 2 CPU Test 1 CPU Test 2 |
| PCMark Vantage | Version: 1.0.2.0 Patch 1901 PCMark Benchmark Memories Benchmark |
| SiSoftware Sandra 2010 | Version: 2010.1.16.10 Processor Arithmetic, Cryptography, Memory Bandwith |
Overclocking Table
| AMD Phenom II X6 1090T | 3,200 MHz | 3,400 MHz | 3,600 MHz | 3,800 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiplier | 16x | 17x | 18x | 19x | 20x |
| Turbo (three cores) | 18x | 19x | 20x | 20x | - |
| Base Frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Turbo CORE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| System Idle Power | 83W | 83W | 85W | 85W | 125W |
| System Peak Power | 201W | 207W | 232W | 271W | 445W |
| Vcore | 1.325V | 1.325V | 1.4125V | 1.4875V | 1.55V |
| CPU-Z VT idle | 1.212V | 1.212V | 1.212V | 1.212V | 1.56V |
| CPU-Z VT load | 1.248V | 1.248V | 1.272V | 1.404V | 1.596V |
| Stable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Overclocking Technique | AMD OverDrive | BIOS | |||
I hope Intel Fan go away because I don't want to hear about $1000 CPU when you can have these for 1/5 the price... affordable and efficient
if only intel would bring out a 32nm quad core already...
Great article. Need to do these article on more processors that are affordable to the masses.
Interesting article.
I am interested in seeing Bulldozer released.
Wow...AMD's silicon is pretty awesome and a hexa-core is a great thing to compete on the desktop, but when you look at the new i7 875K ($320), all arguments about platform aside, I don't think AMD's value lead here is all that clear. This doesn't even include your previous analysis the10-20% efficiency increase which overclocking the Lynnfields can yield.
How long will AMD make us wait for Bulldozer? Serious fans would probably be suffocating right now by holding their breath for its release.
... i bookmark this one... when i get my 1090T, this article will be usefull...
FTFA:
I disagree. If I had 200 dollars to spend on a CPU, why do I need to know how a 1000 dollar CPU stacks up to a 200 dollar CPU? It's clearly out of my price rage. Showing a side-by-side comparison of what Intel offers and what AMD offer at the same price-point would be very relevant.
ok... AMD 3.4Ghz for $300... Intel I7 920 $280 at 3.6Ghz.
What I would have found more interesting is a comparison between an overclocked 1090T and an overclocked i7 930 which costs approximately the same (unless you have access to microcenter and can get the i7 for $200).
ok... AMD 3.4Ghz for $300... Intel I7 920 $280 at 3.6Ghz.
You forgot to mention the i7 isn't stock..
really wish they had included the 1055t in this article.
is it worth spending the extra 100 dollars when overclocking is taken into account?
why not theres no tests results in games like GTA IV or Flight Simulator X, where the cores are heavily used. without this article is useless
Could have added a performance / power chart with frequency increase
really wish they had included the 1055t in this article. is it worth spending the extra 100 dollars when overclocking is taken into account?
Probably not, but then some would argue the 1090T Black Edition might be higher binned and would be easier to overclock because of the unlocked multiplier.
Should include the 1055T...Can it same efficiency at 3.4Ghz like 1090T..?Then we can judge its efficiency & performance also..Y spend xtra 100$ if that performance we in 200$???
What a great article.
I am stunned.
So running a CPU at 400W isn't stable huh?
I'd like to add that if you upgrade your AMD rig you don't have to spend extra 120$ on mobo and 150$ on new ram and Intel already announced that next cpu after i7 will have a new socket. I've found benchmarks that show phenom x2 gets only 2% performance hit while running on ddr2. Does anyone know the figures for X6?
This article tells me that the 1090T performs very well if you overclock it even a little; and that it has to be overclocked to do well. Great; if I buy one there's no way now that I won't overclock it. Now, please take an equivalently-priced Intel CPU+motherboard+RAM combo and overclock it to the same [non-extreme] degree. Then compare the performance and the value. Any possible fanboy differences aside, that will tell me which CPU to buy. Thank you.