- Socket 7 Board Review July 1998
- Review of Slot 1 Motherboards with Intel 440BX Chipset - Spring 1998
- 100 MHz Front Side Bus - What's the Beef ?
- Intels New Blessings for the PC and More ...
- Performance Preview - of Systems with Intel 440BX Chipset
- Review of Socket 7 AGP Boards
- The Bus Speed Guide
- Review of Socket 8 Motherboards
- Review of Socket 7 PCI Motherboards
- FIC PA-2012 Revision 1.2 - The First Socket 7 AGP Motherboard
- Upgrade for a 939 system
- Replace my PC or not ?
- Another 4x4 topic...8-)
- Sloooooow Conroe build
- What cpu for a budget desktop for my parents?
- AGP and new motherboards to look at for new system
- Nvidia Goes For Four: Quad SLI Gaming Dissected
- X38 Comparison Part 1: DDR2 Motherboards
- [Recommandation] Sk 775, fsb1333, 650i or p35
- Question on Crossfire with motherboards
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: slot, 1, chipset, comparison
Topics: INTEL
Syndication:
Test Setup
Playing around with pre-release or prototype boards is not very funny since it takes quite a while to find out which BIOS setting can be enabled safely and to discover which others cause hang ups. This applies particularly to the SiS board, which are reference boards from SiS. The Apollo Pro boards we got are the KA-6100 and VB-601-V from FIC and the Tekram P6Pro-A5. Since VIA and SiS are now entering a market which is very demanding, I wanted them to challenge one of the very best. So the BX competitor was the well known Asus P2B. All boards ran with a 400 MHz Pentium II.
I benchmarked with the fast DVGS high end harddisks, since the results shouldn't be influenced by slow or little optimized IDE drivers. By the way, the VIA chipset revision which was used on those boards does not support the busmaster mode, so that's another reason for using SCSI in these benchmarks. The final revisson which will be shipped does support it, of course. The operating systems I used were Windows 98 and Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 3.
I would have used a Riva128 card, but the VIA chipset board didn't permit this. Neither the Asus V3000 nor the Canopus Total3D 128V ran with the nVIDIA drivers 1.50H under Windows 95 or NT. So I used the Matrox Millennium II for the WinStone benchmarks. To determine the game performance I used a single Voodoo² 3D accelerator equipped with 12 MB memory and the games Quake II and Incoming at 640x480 and 800x600 resolutions. Of course I used the actual 3Dfx reference drivers (Glide 2.53, Glide3 3.0, Direct3D drivers 4.10.01.0180-2.17) and Microsoft DirectX 6. All benchmarks ran with 128 MB PC-100 SDRAM (2x 64 MB, LGS, 7 ns) and activated L2 ECC.
The Tekram board also offers an asynchronous memory mode. I also added benchmarks with 66 MHz memory to show you how small the difference really is (comparison with the LX board P2L97 from Asus).
- Previous page VIA Apollo Pro
- Next page SiS 5600 Motherboards