USB Technology: Multi-TT Hub Goes Head-to-Head With Single-TT
Table of contents
- 1 – The Hub Hubbub: Intelligent Vs. Conventional USB 2.0 Hubs
- 2 – Universal Serial Bus: ABC
- 3 – Single TT Or Multi TT
- 4 – Standard Hub With One TT: DLink DUB-H4
- 5 – In The Other Corner, The Multi-TT: LinXcel USB 2.0 Hub

USB has been a common standard for several years now. Unfortunately, many people mistakenly believe that USB 2.0 has made poor performance a thing of the past. The naked truth is that USB 2.0 devices can churn through data in no time, and USB 1.1 devices can be optimally interfaced with PCs only if they are not connected through a USB hub.
Time and time again, users have been stopped dead in their tracks because their USB 1.1 hubs only have a bandwidth of 12 mbit/s that has to be distributed among all their devices. You would think that the solution ought to be simple - just switch to USB 2.0, which offers 480 mbit/s - and there you have it: several slow devices running at an acceptable speed. Right?
Not really. Not all hubs use the same method to insert the 12 mbit/s signals into the 480 mbit/s data stream. The insertion is the responsibility of special units in the USB hubs called transaction translators, or TTs for short. The TTs can't work with several devices simultaneously, which creates the bottleneck you bump up against whenever you connect several USB 1.1 devices at once.
We received a hub with multiple TTs from Cypress Semiconductor, a major manufacturer of this type of component, and put it up against a conventional hub with a single TT in a test that simulates real-world conditions.
- Latest Storage Solutions News
- 07/26 – Sony Develops Powerful Laser for 1TB Optical Disc
- 07/19 – ADATA's S596 Turbo SSD Offers Two Interfaces
- 07/15 – LaCie XtremKey USB Drive is Near Indestructible
- 07/09 – Any USB Peripheral is a Potential Security Threat
- 07/07 – Buffalo Unveils 256GB IDE-Based SSDs
- All Storage Solutions news
- Latest Storage Solutions reviews
- 04/23 – Conclusion
- 04/23 – Benchmark Results: I/O Performance
- 04/23 – Benchmark Results: Read/Write Throughput
- 04/23 – Test Setup And Access Time
- 04/23 – Transcend Ultimate SDHC Class 10 Card (8GB, 16GB)
- All Storage Solutions reviews
- 07/29 – Five USB 3.0 Flash Drives For Your...
- 07/27 – MSI's GT660 Gaming Notebook Heads to...
- 07/07 – Hitachi External HDDs Looks Sleek,...
- 07/06 – GeForce GTX 480M: AVADirect’s W880CU...
- 06/30 – Asus Eee Netbook Will Have...
- 06/21 – Toshiba Launches Dual-Screen Concept PC
- 06/12 – Alkaline Charger, Gigabit Powerline,...
- 06/12 – Sandy Bridge, Color-Coded PSUs, And SSDs
- 06/12 – Gigabyte: Graphics And Notebooks
- 06/12 – Gigabyte: New Flagship, Mini-ITX, USB...
- 06/10 – MSI's GT660 Gaming Notebook Gets Spec'd
- 06/04 – Conclusion
- 06/01 – Gigabyte 890FXA-UD7
- 05/27 – MSI Shows External Graphics Card w/ATI
- 05/25 – 3M Launches 20-Finger Multi-Touch...
- 05/20 – Intel Confirms 25nm NAND Flash for...
- 05/20 – The 3D Blu-ray User Experience:...
- 05/14 – Gigabyte's P55A-UD7 Motherboard
- 05/12 – Motherboards
- 05/11 – Creative Returns with SB X-Fi...
- usb 3.0 hub
- single tt
- windows 7 mail program
- atk0110 driver
- linksys router won't work with modem
- q8300
- su4100
- samsung s2 review
- akamai netsession interface virus
- pfn_list_corrupt
- win 7 internet connection problems
- windows 7 superfetch ssd
- hard disk compare
- gt 120
- what's the difference between ddr2 and ddr3
- directx 9 windows 7
- n270 vs n280
- i7 vs quadcore
- 4.2.2.2
- atom 230


