Intel has shared a new document that lists the DDR5 memory kits validated on the chipmaker's Alder Lake platform that will soon vie for a spot on our list of Best CPUs for gaming. This isn't something you see every day as Intel has never done so in the past, and typically only motherboard or memory vendors post QVLs.
One common aspect among the different memory kits on Intel's QVL is that they are all dual-channel 32GB (2x16GB). There are 16GB (2x8GB) options out there, but it seems that the majority of memory manufacturers are starting right off the bat with the 32GB memory kits instead. Alder Lake supports DDR5-4800 by default; therefore, DDR5-4800 memory kits should work without any fanfare.
One of DDR5's improvements includes a lower operating voltage (1.1V down from DDR4's 1.2V). However, only the DDR5-4800 and some of the DDR5-5200 memory kits run at 1.1V. As usual, not every DDR5-4800 memory kit is manufactured equal. Apparently, Corsair has the better binned DDR5-4800 memory kits out of all the vendors. The Dominator Platinum checks in with 34-35-35-69 timings, whereas Kingston's Fury Beast is rated for 38-38-38-70. Given the lower timings and flashy looks, Corsair's memory kit will likely carry a small premium.
XMP 3.0 DDR5 Memory Kits For Alder Lake
Speed | Voltage | CAS Latency / timings | Kit Capacity | DIMMs per Kit | Multi-Channel Kit | Socket | Manufacturer | Processor | DDR Technology | XMP Cert. Revision | Module Type | Part Number | Certified Board (board rev / min BIOS) | Date Added |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5200MHz | 1.10 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-5200U4040A16GX2-RS5K | Asus ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming WiFi(R1.02/0030) | 10.6.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.10 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-5200U4040A16GX2-RS5K | MSI Pro Z690-A WiFi(2.0/T.ME) | 10.6.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.10 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-5200U4040A16GX2-RS5K | ASRock Z690 Taichi(1.01/1.34BD02) | 10.6.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 38-38-38-84 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMK32GX5M2X5200C38 / CMK32GX5M2X5200C38W | Asus ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming WiFi(R1.02/0030) | 10.11.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 38-38-38-84 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMK32GX5M2X5200C38 / CMK32GX5M2X5200C38W | MSI Z690 Gaming Carbon(1.0/TMG) | 10.11.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 38-38-38-84 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2C4800C34 / CMT32GX5M2C4800C34W | Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master(1.0/F5d) | 10.11.2021 |
4800MHz | 1.10 | 34-35-35-69 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2C4800C34 / CMT32GX5M2C4800C34W | Asus ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming WiFi(R1.02/0072) | 10.11.2021 |
4800MHz | 1.10 | 34-35-35-69 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2C4800C34 / CMT32GX5M2C4800C34W | MSI Z690 Gaming Carbon(1.0/TMG) | 10.11.2021 |
4800MHz | 1.10 | 34-35-35-69 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2C4800C34 / CMT32GX5M2C4800C34W | Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master(1.0/F5d) | 10.11.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 38-38-38-84 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2X5200C38 / CMT32GX5M2X5200C38W | Asus ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming WiFi(R1.02/0030) | 10.11.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 38-38-38-84 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2X5200C38 / CMT32GX5M2X5200C38W | MSI Z690 Gaming Carbon(1.0/TMG) | 10.11.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 38-38-38-84 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Corsair | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | CMT32GX5M2X5200C38/ CMT32GX5M2X5200C38W | Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master(1.0/F5d) | 10.11.2021 |
6666MHz | 1.35 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700KF | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-6666U4040F16GX2-TZ5RS | Asus ROG Strix Z690 Apex(R1.02/0072) | 10.18.2021 |
6600MHz | 1.35 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700KF | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-6600U4040F16GX2-TZ5RS | Asus ROG Strix Z690 Apex(R1.02/0072) | 10.18.2021 |
6600MHz | 1.35 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700KF | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-6600U4040F16GX2-TZ5RS | MSI MEG Z690 Unify-X(0B/A.05) | 10.18.2021 |
6600MHz | 1.35 | 40-40-40-76 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | G.Skill | Core i7-12700KF | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | F5-6600U4040F16GX2-TZ5RS | ASRock Z690 Aqua OC(1.01/1.47) | 10.18.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 40-40-40-80 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Kingston | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | KF552C40BBK2-32 | Asus ROG Maximus XIV Hero(1.02/0604) | 10.18.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 40-40-40-80 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Kingston | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | KF552C40BBK2-32 | Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master(1.0/F5d) | 10.18.2021 |
5200MHz | 1.25 | 40-40-40-80 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Kingston | Core i5-12600KF | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | KF552C40BBK2-32 | MSI MPG Z690 Carbon WiFi(1.1/1.11) | 10.18.2021 |
4800MHz | 1.10 | 38-38-38-70 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Kingston | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | KF548C38BBK2-32 | Asus ROG Maximus XIV Hero(1.02/0604) | 10.18.2021 |
4800MHz | 1.10 | 38-38-38-70 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Kingston | Core i9-12900K | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | KF548C38BBK2-32 | Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master(1.0/F5d) | 10.18.2021 |
4800MHz | 1.10 | 38-38-38-70 | 16GB | 2 | Dual | LGA1700 | Kingston | Core i5-12600KF | DDR5 | 0.6 | U-DIMM | KF548C38BBK2-32 | MSI MPG Z690 Carbon WiFi(1.1/1.11) | 10.18.2021 |
If you're a hardcore enthusiast or just one with deep pockets, G.Skill currently has the fastest DDR5 memory kits on the market. The manufacturer offers memory kits from DDR5-6000 to DDR5-6666 from the Trident Z5 lineup. Regardless of the data rate, the memory kits have their timings configured to 40-40-40-76 and pull 1.35V. Those aren't even the fastest memory kits, though. G.Skill has already teased its DDR5-6800 memory kit, which will likely cost an arm and a leg.
The official supported data rate on Alder Lake is DDR5-4800, so anything faster is considered overclocking. Although faster DDR5 memory kits are validated with Alder Lake, your processor's IMC (integrated memory controller) is still the deciding factor on whether you can run those DDR5-6000+ speeds. Alder Lake is uncharted territory, so no one really knows the capability of its IMC.
Intel introduced gear ratios with the 11th Generation Rocket Lake family, which allowed the 14nm processors to accommodate memory up to DDR4-5333 -- well, the very extraordinary samples, at least. With memory brands already eyeing DDR5-10000, Alder Lake must be up to the task. The hybrid chips are available for preorder, with orders shipping out on November 4. Don't forget to check back for our thorough review of the new breed of desktop processors.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
This 32GB RAM kit is selling for an all-time low, great for an AMD system upgrade — T-Force 32GB DDR5-6000 memory kit with good timings available for $87
SK hynix develops 6th-gen 10nm-class DDR5 with the world's first 16Gb DRAM modules — chipmaker claims electric savings of up to 30% for data centers
-
InvalidError
How so? The total width of a DDR5 DIMM (2x32b) is the same as DDR4 (1x64b), so DDR5-6400 is still twice as much total bandwidth, albeit with the possibility of addressing both halves of the DDR5 DIMM independently.Yuka said:Curious how there are no 6400MT/s kits as they're the equivalent to 3200MT/s
Even if such high-speed DIMMs existed, I doubt their pricing would make them popular options within the next couple of years. -
-Fran-
You missed the mark by quite a lot, lol.InvalidError said:How so? The total width of a DDR5 DIMM (2x32b) is the same as DDR4 (1x64b), so DDR5-6400 is still twice as much total bandwidth, albeit with the possibility of addressing both halves of the DDR5 DIMM independently.
Even if such high-speed DIMMs existed, I doubt their pricing would make them popular options within the next couple of years.
Let me rephrase: DDR5 6400MT/s is the equivalent to DDR4 3200MT/s: double speed, double latency, about same effective delay of ~7ns. They went from 6000MT/s to 6600MT/s. It just reads weird to me, but nothing more than that.
Regards. -
firerod1 acme64 said:i thought the mobo manufacturers posted QVL's
I got corsair dominator platinum first edition 5200 and an asus z690-F, hopefully it runs at its lowest timings :) -
Alvar "Miles" Udell It's going to be interesting to see the performance difference in Adder Lake (and Ryzen 6000 series) from the top to the bottom of the RAM stack. For Ryzen and DDR4 it can be "dramatic" in SOME cases, while others not so much. And it will be interesting to see if Adder Lake suffers the same kind of penalties first generation Ryzen chips did as well.Reply
-
d0x360 Alvar Miles Udell said:It's going to be interesting to see the performance difference in Adder Lake (and Ryzen 6000 series) from the top to the bottom of the RAM stack. For Ryzen and DDR4 it can be "dramatic" in SOME cases, while others not so much. And it will be interesting to see if Adder Lake suffers the same kind of penalties first generation Ryzen chips did as well.
All generations of Ryzen are greatly effected by memory speed and timings. I got an extra 14% performance out of my kit with a manual overclock and tighter timings. I'm still leaving performance on the table despite that. If I had a higher quality kit I could be running at 4600mt CL15.
Plus when you overclock the memory or use XMP/DOCP you also need to overclock the infinity fabric which gives you further gains..and if you don't you will end up losing performance because of the latency regardless of how good your ram oc and timings are.
These timings look terrible if you ask me but it's early days for high performance DDR5. I had expected they would have used DDR5 to not only increase m/t but also get timings down to crazy levels without needing to tweak 100 settings and run memtest86 over and over again..