We Overclocked Raspberry Pi 5 to 3 GHz, Up to 25% Perf Boost

Pis in Space
(Image credit: Future / Pexels / Openclipart)

The Raspberry Pi 5 is here and we have already reviewed it, pushing it to its limits, or so we thought. Just how far can you push a Raspberry Pi 5? We decided to take it upon ourselves to overclock both the impressive 2.4-GHz Arm Cortex-A76 64-bit CPU and the new 800 MHz VideoCore VII GPU and found we could push both to new heights of 3 GHz and 1.1 GHz. 

With the overclocks, we got noticeably better performance -- up to 25% in some processor-heavy workloads. However, on graphics-intensive tasks such as video streaming or gaming, we didn't see many gains. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Les Pounder
Associate Editor

Les Pounder is an associate editor at Tom's Hardware. He is a creative technologist and for seven years has created projects to educate and inspire minds both young and old. He has worked with the Raspberry Pi Foundation to write and deliver their teacher training program "Picademy".

With contributions from
  • bit_user
    Not a word about what cooling solution was used, temperatures, or how it affected power consumption?

    This being Tom's Hardware, I had to check several times! I hope the article gets updated with some of this info.
    : )
    Reply
  • Ravestein NL
    My thoughts exactly and did the CPU/GPU throttle in some tests?
    Reply
  • LabRat 891
    Now that the CPU is OC'd,
    take the M.2 Hat and adapt a x4 Uplink PCIe switch/HBA, and start adding GPGPUs.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    LabRat 891 said:
    Now that the CPU is OC'd,
    take the M.2 Hat and adapt a x4 Uplink PCIe switch/HBA, and start adding GPGPUs.
    Toms' Raspberry Pi 5 Live Blog article linked to one where Jeff Geerling tried a variety of things, ultimately working up to dGPUs:

    https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2023/testing-pcie-on-raspberry-pi-5
    Reply
  • apiltch
    bit_user said:
    Not a word about what cooling solution was used, temperatures, or how it affected power consumption?

    This being Tom's Hardware, I had to check several times! I hope the article gets updated with some of this info.
    : )

    Thanks (and I mean this) for holding our feet to the fire. I'll put some more detail in. I guess we though it was implied but we should have said that we used the official Raspberry Pi 5 cooler. In our review, we noted that this is really the only cooler that fits right now (you can awkwardly try to put a Raspberry Pi 4 cooler on it but it doesn't fit correctly).

    Les mentioned some of this in the review that we should have put into the breakout overclocking article as well. He said "At 3 GHz the Raspberry Pi 5 had an idle temperature of 46.6°C and consumed 3 Watts. Under stress the Raspberry Pi 5 hit a top temperature of 69.2°C and consumed 10 Watts."
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I want to see the Pi 5 performance compared to Pi 4, when neither has a heat sink or fan.

    Not just thermals, but some performance numbers.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    apiltch said:
    I guess we though it was implied but we should have said that we used the official Raspberry Pi 5 cooler.
    Indeed, that's what I thought most likely, but I hate making assumptions. Furthermore, your Raspberry Pi 5 Live Blog article did feature that 52Pi Ice Tower cooler:

    apiltch said:
    idle temperature of 46.6°C and consumed 3 Watts. Under stress the Raspberry Pi 5 hit a top temperature of 69.2°C and consumed 10 Watts."
    Fair point. I did read that very shortly after it was posted, having stumbled across the launch coverage just as I was about to go to bed.
    😫
    Respect to you and your staff for covering that midnight launch! Actually, when did the embargo lift? Was it like 8 AM UK?
    Reply
  • mechkbfan
    How does these benchmarks compare to x86 CPU/GPU?

    Are we up to Intel sandy bridge laptop performance now?
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    This is not an import comment or anything, but I REALLY liked the clip art used for this article.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    brandonjclark said:
    This is not an import comment or anything, but I REALLY liked the clip art used for this article.
    Good point. I think I sort of noticed it, but was too eager to get into the content.
    (Image credit: Future / Pexels / Openclipart)
    Ah, that's a WebP. Which reminds me about a recent critical vulnerability. Make sure your browsers are up to date, people!"Critical libwebp Vulnerability Under Active Exploitation - Gets Maximum CVSS Score"https://thehackernews.com/2023/09/new-libwebp-vulnerability-under-active.html
    I know cybersecurity isn't really Toms' brief, but I am a bit surprised not to see that mentioned here!
    Reply