VIA Selling S3 Graphics to HTC

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • mehrdad_ati
    THEY HAD BOGHT ATI IMAGEON BEFORE ! SO WHY DID THEY NID S3 ?
    Reply
  • fyasko
    so via never benefited or saw any of s3's IP?
    Reply
  • razor512
    s3 graphics mostly sucked so via didn't need it

    I had a old motherboard with s3 graphics, I had to run notepad on low settings.
    Reply
  • vaughn2k
    mehrdad_atiTHEY HAD BOGHT ATI IMAGEON BEFORE ! SO WHY DID THEY NID S3 ?Imageon was discontinued, and not sold...
    Reply
  • eddieroolz
    Cheap price for a chip company, if you'd ask me.
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    Notepad joke fail....
    Reply
  • S3 had some good technologies for the time, it surpassed even some Nvidia cards in 1999-2000. Hope to see some development now!
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    The S3 chips weren't all that bad. Matrox was the undisputed leader, but S3 was a splendid option for anyone still sitting with old isa cards. They lost the fight when the riva and tnt cards arrived, but not before then.
    Reply
  • f-gomes
    sad
    Reply
  • lowenz
    I still have a PCI Virge with 4 MB :D
    Reply