Superconductor Breakthrough Findings Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testing

Superconductor image
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Humanity may be in the throes of another breakthrough that's every bit as impactful as the invention of the transistor and the advent (and eventual vindication) of quantum computing. LK-99, as it's been named, is a new compound that researchers believe will enable the fabrication of room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductors. Initially published by a Korean team last Friday, frantic work is underway throughout the research world to validate the paper's claims. For now, two separate sources have already provided preliminary confirmations that this might actually be the real thing — Chinese researchers have even posted video proof. Strap in, this is a maglev-powered, superconducting ride.

Superconductors, a wild category of compounds that can conduct electricity without any losses, have been a metaphorical goose chase for years now, with multiple research teams claiming (and then retracting) papers and announcements of its achievement. The reason is simple: Few things come close to the potential of an actual superconductor discovery in terms of what it can do for humanity's current and future technology. Imagine if your 16-core mainstream CPU (which likely requires a competent watercooling solution to avoid incinerating itself) operated without power losses — no current leakage, no electricity waste in the form of heat. Superconductors mean almost perfectly efficient computing.

Scale that to the world's supercomputers, and you begin to get an idea of the performance impact when trillions of transistors based on superconducting materials work in tandem across GPU and CPU tiles to accelerate things like Artificial Intelligence (AI) workloads. Or scale it in the realm of consumer electronics, quantum computing (where superconductors are important for Josephson junctions), and magnets in general (maglev trains, tokamak fusion reactors, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), electric motors and generators...)

If you can dream it and it features an electrical current or magnetism, it's likely a superconducting material would improve most aspects of it while leaving a surplus of previously-wasted energy within humanity's batteries. Environmental sustainability, then, is also a factor.

There might be more to LK-99 than skeptics expected, as two research teams claim to have informally confirmed certain aspects of the superconductivity claims — albeit in preliminary testing.  Researcher Sinéad Griffin from the U.S.'s Lawrence Berkeley National Lab pored over the original paper, taking advantage of the supercomputing capabilities within the Department of Energy to simulate the LK-99 material. This complex-yet-simple concoction results from combining the minerals lanarkite (Pb₂SO₅) and copper phosphide (Cu₃P), which are then baked within a 4-day, multi-step, small batch, solid-state synthesis process.

As a result of the simulations, the researcher published an analysis letter in pre-print form to Arxiv, where she confirmed that the resulting material should manifest the superconduction pathways for electrons to travel through unimpeded and without any resistance. Interestingly, she noticed that these superconducting pathways only form in very specific areas of the compound, namely the highest-energy areas of the resulting crystal lattice.

Because physics dictates that systems tend to remain stable at their lowest-possible energy states, this means that the amount of superconducting material produced with each "shake-and-bake" manufacturing attempt will result in relatively low quantities of the material. The hope, then, is that further refinements to the fabrication process will yield higher quantities of the material that can then be harvested and put toward building the superconductors themselves.

But in what's perhaps the most definite sign of a verification, Chinese researchers with the Huazhong University of Science and Technology have claimed to have successfully replicated the superconductor's manufacturing process, posting a video on Bilibili as proof.



The above video showcases the Meissner effect as being definite proof of the material's superconducting capabilities. The Meissner effect refers to the expulsion of a magnetic field due to the superconducting process. It is the reason why the video showcases levitating materials — they are interacting with LK-99's Meissner-induced magnetic field.

The entire story surrounding this discovery is a scientific rollercoaster ride, with rogue scientists, updated papers, plus cloudy definitions and process descriptions within the paper that make replication efforts more difficult, and even a Russian soil scientist (and anime catgirl) deconstructing the original Korean paper to unveil the trademark levitation of the Meissner effect over her own kitchen counter.

We've seen movies with much less complex plots than this already. It's eerily appropriate that such a monumental discovery would be rife with drama. And we're still waiting for a definite announcement that yes, humanity has finally produced room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductors. After that, there are plenty more physics barriers to crash through, as always.

Edit 8/2/2023 1:40 pm ET: Embedded BiliBili video from the Chinese researchers. 

Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • InvalidError
    As with many scientific discoveries, discovering something seemingly revolutionary often ends up in disappointment when the discovery cannot be turned into anything actually usable.

    LK-99 might be real, though you still need to grow the crystals to usable sizes and shapes. A superconductor will have limited uses if you cannot cost-effectively make wires, discs, cylinders and other basic yet very handy shapes from it.
    Reply
  • A Stoner
    Next up, room temperature fusion!
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    InvalidError said:
    As with many scientific discoveries, discovering something seemingly revolutionary often ends up in disappointment when the discovery cannot be turned into anything actually usable.

    LK-99 might be real, though you still need to grow the crystals to usable sizes and shapes. A superconductor will have limited uses if you cannot cost-effectively make wires, discs, cylinders and other basic yet very handy shapes from it.
    Yes going from how rough the disc looked the material may be quite difficult to shape. Going to be interesting see how this progresses.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    thisisaname said:
    Yes going from how rough the disc looked the material may be quite difficult to shape. Going to be interesting see how this progresses.
    They said themselves that the reason the disc wasn't levitating well was likely due to excess impurities. The disc looked so crumbly likely because it is just a clump of little crystals held together by leftovers, not a single somewhat cohesive chunk.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Reply
  • garylcamp
    There still seems some skepticism as an article in Science 2 reports a failure to duplicate. But things are moving fast so I expect more clarity soon. Note that, like Fusion or voice recognition, it may not be as easy as it appears at first. Need more info on making useful material to decide.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Imagine if your 16-core mainstream CPU (which likely requires a competent watercooling solution to avoid incinerating itself) operated without power losses — no current leakage, no electricity waste in the form of heat. Superconductors mean almost perfectly efficient computing.
    Even if there are room-temperature superconductors that we could use in CPUs, is this statement even credible? Doesn't a lot of the power dissipation of modern CPUs come from leakage and transistor-switching?
    https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/technical-articles/switching-losses-effects-on-semiconductors/
    Reply
  • bit_user
    InvalidError said:
    As with many scientific discoveries, discovering something seemingly revolutionary often ends up in disappointment when the discovery cannot be turned into anything actually usable.

    LK-99 might be real, though you still need to grow the crystals to usable sizes and shapes. A superconductor will have limited uses if you cannot cost-effectively make wires, discs, cylinders and other basic yet very handy shapes from it.
    A bit like why Graphene has taken so long to find commercially viable applications?

    But, unlike Graphene, there might be other materials in this same category that are easier to manufacture at scale.
    Reply
  • toffty
    LK99 is not a super conductor

    RjzL9cS3VW8:34View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RjzL9cS3VW8&t=34
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    bit_user said:
    Even if there are room-temperature superconductors that we could use in CPUs, is this statement even credible? Doesn't a lot of the power dissipation of modern CPUs come from leakage and transistor-switching?
    Leakage comes from the extreme proximity between traces, I don't think superconductors will do anything about that and leakage is becoming an increasingly significant loss factor as things get packed tighter together. CMOS logic works by charging and discharging gates, the amount of energy spent charging or discharging gate capacitors is Q=Cg*V^2/2, superconductors aren't going to change that either, nor the energy associated with charging and discharging the remainder of parasitic trace capacitances. The only thing superconductors might change is trace conduction losses assuming you can shape crystals in a way that lets you put them on wafers.

    Carbon nanotubes were hyped as the solution to semiconductor copper losses 20 years ago. I don't remember the last time I read about any sign of progress on that. Getting tubes to grow to the necessary lengths and self-assemble on a wafer sounds like extremely tricky business.

    bit_user said:
    A bit like why Graphene has taken so long to find commercially viable applications?

    But, unlike Graphene, there might be other materials in this same category that are easier to manufacture at scale.
    Graphene has plenty of applications when you only need micron-sized flakes... such as thermal pastes, high-performance greases and pencil leads :)

    Likewise, if LK-99 is real but can only be made in micron-sized flakes, I it may still be useful in less glamorous applications such as magnetic filler in ferrite-like transformer and induction motor cores to eliminate most of the remaining eddy current losses there assuming it can also bear the associated current and magnetic flux densities before quenching.

    No shortage of things that can go wrong besides the LK-99 experiment turning out to be a hoax.
    Reply