Empty RAM slots can harm DRAM performance — Asus NitroPath slots curb electrical interference, gain 400 MT/s, and are 40% shorter
NitroPath may come to other motherboard OEMs as early as 2025.
Asus's new short NitroPath RAM slot design, arriving on select Asus X870E and Z890 motherboards, boosts RAM speeds by up to 400 MT/s by cutting down on harmful electrical interference from empty RAM slots. Der8auer, a fixture in the extreme overclocking space, recently uploaded his analysis of the new tech, helping to elucidate how a better RAM slot can make RAM more stable at high speeds.
Der8auer's video, which includes previously unseen images and insider quotes, was started based on a strange observation. NitroPath RAM slots are not included on Asus's 2-RAM-slot high-end Z890 motherboards—such as the upcoming ROG Maximus Z890 Apex—even though Maximus boards are typically tuned for extreme overclocking. Omitting a strictly better RAM slot from a high-end motherboard seems a strange choice by Asus, but further analysis reveals that NitroPath would likely make no impact on a 2-slot motherboard.
NitroPath slots are around 40% shorter than a standard DRAM slot. This height difference also shortens the metal contacts that touch a DIMM's contact pins and bends the slot's contacts down rather than up and out. Any exposed metal in a circuit acts as an antenna and creates electrical noise; unpopulated RAM slots are not immune to this phenomenon.
When a dual-channel, four-RAM-slot motherboard has two slots populated with RAM and two empty, the empty slots emit enough noise to interfere with RAM operation at high speeds. This interference is why many servers occasionally use dummy RAM sticks to populate all empty RAM slots, safely terminating their open connections.
The first and second images in the slideshow compare the electrical activity and performance of DIMMs running at medium and high speeds, with RAM in slots A2 and B2 and slots A1 and B1 staying empty. The middle column's DIMMs use standard RAM slots, with the right column connected via NitroPath slots.
The eye chart diagram shows the RAM's electrical activity. In the first image, all four diagrams show two blue sinusoidal waves crisscrossing over each other, leaving a tall gap in between (emphasized with red). This gap, the "eye," reflects electrical signal quality on the axes of time (x-axis) and voltage (y-axis).
In the first image, there is not much difference in signal quality between NitroPath and standard RAM slots, meaning NitroPath also will not make much difference for RAM at average speeds. But image 2 tells a different story. Here, clocked at 10,000 MT/s, standard RAM slots have a problem. The RAM in the standard slots has no eye, and its signal is muddled severely. This muddled signal results in an unstable system, which may not boot. The NitroPath slots have no such problem. The eye, while small, is still visible, and RAM in NitroPath slots can run stable at 10,000 MT/s.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
If the technobabble above lost you, here's a simpler summary: NitroPath RAM slots have significantly shorter contacts, so when empty, they do not emit as much electrical interference, which makes systems unstable at higher RAM clocks. This is likely why Asus elected not to include the new slot tech in its upcoming high-end 2-slot motherboards, as 2-slot boards will not have to worry about empty RAM slots emitting noise.
NitroPath slots, while shorter than standard RAM slots, are also more rugged. Asus's press release claims that NitroPath slots have a 57% higher retention force than standard ones and 20% improvements in lateral latching and release forces. This increased toughness should make a difference for gamers or other enthusiasts who often replace DIMMs in their systems, whether for periodic upgrades or benchmarking and testing. The slots, engineered by Asus and Lotus, will become available for use by other motherboard OEMs after one year, meaning enthusiast-grade gaming motherboards may all be seeing a rising tide in 2025.
Be sure to watch Der8auer's video above for more details on the operation of NitroPath RAM slots and unique cross-section images of traditional vs. NitroPath designs. Intel motherboard partners will reveal their Z890 board designs on October 10, when we see which Asus boards are lucky enough to be fitted with NitroPath.
Dallin Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Dallin has a handle on all the latest tech news.
-
FunSurfer There is a difference in the size of the eye also at 6,400 MT/s, it is bigger with the new connector, but the eye is very small at 10,000 MT/s even with the new connector, so there will be a stability problem at about 12,000 MT/s, so to avoid that for now a dummy RAM is the only option at those RAM speeds.Reply -
thestryker It would be interesting to see how these perform compared to using dummy sticks (though exact testing isn't going to be possible). I imagine the difference wouldn't be very large, but it'd be interesting just the same. I'd guess that current CPUs wouldn't really be able to push high enough memory clocks to negate the benefits without CUDIMMs. It's also entirely possible that the electrical properties of CUDIMMs would end up being different than UDIMMs as well.Reply
I'm guessing the mounting pressure has more to do with the design and longevity than it being any practical advantage. -
cyrusfox
Agreed, I believe you will get less insertion cycles due to this, not a concern for an end user, but will impact the life of dram test modulesH4UnT3R said:So it will scratch the RAM pins more? -
bit_user
Really? The ones I've seen (which are admittedly pre-DDR5 era) were just plastic and didn't terminate anything. I assumed they were there to keep the contacts free of dust or to retain similar airflow as if the slots were populated.The article said:This interference is why many servers occasionally use dummy RAM sticks to populate all empty RAM slots, safely terminating their open connections.
-
Notton Yeah, Buildzoid has been saying this for years about DDR5.Reply
And whenever a maker released a 2-slot DDR5 mobo, so many people would complain.
"waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! I want 4 slots! I want futureproofing when my sticks only hit 5200MT/s anyways! waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! but I want to hit 6400MT/s with 4 slots populatated! waaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!
Without ever realizing 4-slots populated guaranteed speed is like... 4200-4800MT/s
or that the extra slots was hurting the DRAM stability. -
bit_user
What the article said seems to contradict this:cyrusfox said:I believe you will get less insertion cycles due to this, not a concern for an end user, but will impact the life of dram test modules
"Asus's press release claims that NitroPath slots have a 57% higher retention force than standard ones and 20% improvements in lateral latching and release forces. This increased toughness should make a difference for gamers or other enthusiasts who often replace DIMMs in their systems"
It would be nice to get some hard stats on how they compare.
BTW, like a decade ago, I heard of some alternative electroplating that provided similar corrosion resistance as gold, but was cheaper and tougher. I wonder why that didn't seem to catch on.
https://www.semiaccurate.com/2016/04/12/xtalic-makes-a-better-contact-material-than-gold/
I also got some hi-fi cables, like a decade ago, that used some other plating than gold. I wonder if it was the same sort of alloy. Given how much environmental destruction is happening due to particularly the illegal gold mining industry (they use lots of mercury to leech out the gold and it just gets dumped into water ways), I support anything that reduces reliance on gold. -
bit_user
Among W680 boards, 2-slots is basically nonexistent. Well, you can find them in mini-ITX boards, but I wanted ATX. I'd have definitely gone for one, if I could've. I had to get 2x 32 GiB DIMMs just so I could get dual ranked, yet 64 GiB is already more than I expect to use for the life of the machine. Plus, now 64 GiB UDIMMs are on their way (if not already here), making the case for 4 DIMM boards even weaker.Notton said:Yeah, Buildzoid has been saying this for years about DDR5.
And whenever a maker released a 2-slot DDR5 mobo, so many people would complain.
"waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! I want 4 slots! I want futureproofing when my sticks only hit 5200MT/s anyways! waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! but I want to hit 6400MT/s with 4 slots populatated! waaaaaaaaaaaaaagh!
Without ever realizing 4-slots populated guaranteed speed is like... 4200-4800MT/s
or that the extra slots was hurting the DRAM stability. -
thestryker
The enterprise ones I've seen were all this, but the consumer ones have been different.bit_user said:Really? The ones I've seen (which are admittedly pre-DDR5 era) were just plastic and didn't terminate anything. I assumed they were there to keep the contacts free of dust or to retain similar airflow as if the slots were populated.
Corsair had them for DDR4 (Gigabyte sold a kit which was 2 DIMMs/2 fakes unsure if they still do): https://www.corsair.com/us/en/p/pc-components-accessories/cmwlekit2/vengeance-rgb-pro-light-enhancement-kit-aca-a-black-cmwlekit2
They were supposed to have something similar for DDR5, but it hasn't materialized. The price, performance limit and restriction of only Intel on these v-color ones for DDR5 may explain why they haven't: https://v-color.net/collections/ddr5-rgb-filler-kit
Probably these folks: https://www.lotes.cc/enbit_user said:Presumably you don't mean this Lotus?? -
Hotrod2go This reminds me of the dummy sticks used in old Intel 850 & E variant chipset boards that featured RDRAM technology around the early 2000s.Reply