Aliens Vs. Predator: DirectX 11 Game Performance Analyzed
Conclusion
When it comes down to performance, Aliens vs. Predator is happiest in DirectX 11 mode running on a card with ample performance. That means you'll want at least a Radeon HD 5770 for 1920x1080 and at least a Radeon HD 5850 at 2560x1600. If you want to use 4xAA, 1920x1080 is a realistic cap, and a Radeon HD 5850 is the minimum you'll need for that setting.
That's not to say that DirectX 9 mode delivers sub-par visuals. In fact, it's almost impossible to see the difference. However, in this particular game, the DirectX 11 code path offers higher frame rates and has a monopoly on AA. Those features are important enough to get the DirectX 11 option a solid recommendation.
With texture memory lowered to the normal setting, lesser cards with 512MB like the Radeon HD 5670 can hit modest frame rates at 1280x1024, and the GeForce 9800 GT can handle 1650x1080.
If you're in possession of something with a little less power, you're going to need to lower other settings in order to get a smooth minimum frame rate. Unfortunately, AA is not an option for folks with powerful DirectX 9- or 10-class graphics cards. Even though your system might have the rendering muscle to spare, cleaning lower resolutions up with some AA isn't an option for anything but a DirectX 11 card.
How about the gameplay? I've been quite hard on Aliens vs. Predator, a game that I'll admit is an enjoyable diversion. I will say that the developers really nailed the spirit of the license through the use of shadows and lighting, providing a rich environment for both aliens and predators to stalk. No doubt marines will be doing a lot of nail biting. The aliens are particularly well-rendered, and it's hard not to be unsettled by the way they look when approaching you down a dimly-lit corridor. For a lot of people (myself included) the good parts of Aliens vs. Predator might be enough to keep you playing the three relatively short single-player campaigns, especially if you're a fan of the license.
On the downside, it always hurts more to see a game that does so much right while missing a few key fundamentals that could have launched it to greatness. For me, the hand-holding and oversimplification of the single-player game, combined with some underwhelming and obviously corral-inspired level design, really prevented me from enjoying this title as much as I wanted to. At least that's where I'm throwing the blame. When I asked some friends why the classic version seemed better, all they could say was that it was more fun. Maybe that's the best way to put it. Multiplayer modes provide some good times, but even that aspect of the game is tarnished with relatively slow matchmaking.
To summarize, I'm enjoying Aliens vs. Predator enough to play through the marine campaign, I'll probably play through the predator campaign, and I just might play through the alien campaign. While the new game doesn't raise the bar like Rebellion's original did, it does make great use of the license. The multiplayer options can also be fun, but unfortunately the uninspired single-player levels and dumbed-down gameplay leave me wondering how much better the new Aliens vs. Predator could have been.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
-
Kelavarus The thing is, same with DirectX 10, you aren't going to see considerable difference unless it's coded specifically for that API. I have seen some absolutely amazing things done with DirectX 10, but only because the engine was purely for DirectX 10, and to my knowledge, no one has even attempted that with DirectX 11 yet anyway.Reply
To reach the broader audience, games are coded with DirectX 9 in mind then have DX10/11 tacked on with a few features.
We're not going to see much of a jump until DX9 is dropped completely, and especially with consoles running around DX9-ish, it's not going to happen till they upgrade, probably. Just my 2c. -
Annisman I will say one thing, DX11 is a new api, and though the differences in screenshots is minute, it's great to see no performance loss going with DX11. I think it took a whole year or more to actually see performance increases with DX10 vs. DX 9.Reply
So that is one thing you can take out of this. -
haplo602 "Rebellion Gets A Third Swing At AvP" I thing that should be second swing, as AvP 2 was done by Monolith. Or swing at the third installment :-)Reply
Anyway, the original AvP was the best single and multiplayer pure FPS I ever played. The Alien was the king there, incredibly fast and agile and if done right, one hit killing anything in the game except a marine with a smartgun and head on (or predator with plasma guns in the same situation) :-) ...
The second AvP failed miserably in all aspects maybe except story telling ... I have to have a look at the current one still ... but from your description, I guess I won't like it. Marine with melee against Aliens ? W T H !!!! -
matt87_50 KelavarusThe thing is, same with DirectX 10, you aren't going to see considerable difference unless it's coded specifically for that API. I have seen some absolutely amazing things done with DirectX 10, but only because the engine was purely for DirectX 10, and to my knowledge, no one has even attempted that with DirectX 11 yet anyway.To reach the broader audience, games are coded with DirectX 9 in mind then have DX10/11 tacked on with a few features. We're not going to see much of a jump until DX9 is dropped completely, and especially with consoles running around DX9-ish, it's not going to happen till they upgrade, probably. Just my 2c.Reply
good points, all true.
the biggest thing with DX10 was that it was vista only, no XP. as people flock to win7 with dx11 built in, that won't be such a big problem. also, dx11 doesn't really add much, it just kinda improves on dx10 and adds a couple of really useful things that should actually make life easier for everyone (kinda like win7 compared to vista I suppose) it adds proper multi threading in the drivers and allows the rendering engines to be multi threaded now. this is just a software thing too, so its not really hardware dependant (you don't need dx11 hardware to benefit) the other really useful feature added is tessellation. which is something that devs already do manually, and painfully in dx9 games. if anything its probably better for developers production times than it is for the end user! no complex art pipelines or engines, automatic performance scaling (the card knows how fast it is and can dynamically allocate the right proportion of triangles to every object in order to reach an exact total frame poly budget). it also adds compute shader. all of these things don't really add anything new, we had tessellation on GPGPU before, but it was all third party and more convoluted, so its more about ease of development than new stuff. don't take that the wrong way though. ease of development should lead to much bigger leaps and bounds in graphics than new features that everyone was too scared to use anyway. -
neiroatopelcc Sounds like the new avp faces the same problem borderlands does - it's too easy! I compare borderlands with fallout 3 as they feel about the same. But in borderlands you've got this constant pointer to exactly where you're supposed to go - which makes you not even try to read the actually mission briefings - and when you've just downed a boss you stop and think 'what ? this easy?'Reply
Dumbing down's been seen in wow since burning crusade too. I suppose developers are just broadening their potential customer base by making the games so simple that any 10 year old can play them sufficiently well. -
XxOsurfer3xX Depends on how you play borderlands, if you go to misions over your level is not that easy..Reply -
neiroatopelcc XxOsurfer3xXDepends on how you play borderlands, if you go to misions over your level is not that easy..Yes it is.Reply
Sure 3 levels over you, and you do next to no damage - but you don't die, you simply run out of ammo!
I solved the difficulty level problem by running a lan game and have two other of my chars join. Now there's a feeling of difficulty in playthough 2, but given the directions you're still just following pointers and aren't really immersed in the plot at any rate. You don't have to think, just shoot. Could's well play cs or some other shooter -
Tridec I really can't understand why you didn't use the older ATI 48xx series cards in your review. It would seem logical to do so as there are a lot of your readers with previous gen cards that are thinking about upgrading. You guys did use the Nvidia 260 and even the older Nvidia 9800 GT, but not the "populair" Ati cards.Reply -
Tomtompiper Third swipe, the first AvP was for the Atari Jaguar, by Rebellion and was a cracker.Reply -
ssddx Don Woligroski, I must say that is a very nicely written article! I've only been seeing your name more recently; are you new to Toms?Reply
As for the games themselves: I would have to disagree on the second avp being a failure. The game packs everything you state the first one got right. I would also have to say that the multiplayer is(was) excellent. Theres nothing quite like dropping 150 feet as an alien onto some poor guys head (and the things he would say too!)
Do people still play AVP2 online? If so I might have to get myself into a match for a quick fix.