AMD Radeon RX 7600 Review: Incremental Upgrades

A sideways step from the RX 6650 XT.

AMD Radeon RX 7600 unboxing and card photos
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

AMD isn't pushing 1440p gaming as the primary goal for the RX 7600, but there will still be plenty of games that run reasonably well at this resolution. We're also using ultra settings, however, which can be a problem in some games for GPUs with 8GB of memory. If you're actually hoping to play games at 1440p, you'll definitely benefit by tweaking the settings. Or just use the high preset in most games, and that will get you 90% of the way there.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The aggregate performance from the RX 7600 at 1440p ultra ends up at just 35.5 fps, and all of the ray tracing games in our test suite fall below the 30 fps mark. Some (Cyberpunk 2077) even drop into the single digits.

The RX 6650 XT still delivers very comparable performance, meaning the RX 7600 is less about upgrading that product tier and more about a sideways step with a few extras like AV1 encoding support and a slightly smaller chip.

The RTX 3060 ranks ahead of the RX 7600 now, thanks at least in part to its 12GB VRAM configuration. (We feel bad for anyone that got conned into buying the RTX 3060 8GB variant.) The RX 6700 10GB also starts to pull away, as the extra 2GB (and 11% more bandwidth) can help.

Rasterization performance is still pretty good, especially if you're willing to massage your settings a bit. The RX 7600 averages 60 fps across our nine game test suite, with A Plague Tale: Requiem and Total War: Warhammer 3 being the two lowest results. Using a combination of medium and high settings would probably get both of those closer to 60 fps.

We haven't talked much about upscaling, so let's look at that as well, since 1440p is a great time to start using it on a card like the RX 7600. It's too bad more games don't support FSR 2, as Flight Simulator ran 43% faster at 1440p with FSR 2 Quality mode upscaling. Red Dead Redemption 2 and Forza Horizon 5 don't scale nearly as well, but that seems to be something with their respective engines — DLSS upscaling doesn't help as much in those games either.

Native 1440p ultra with ray tracing on the RX 7600 is just asking for trouble. Only Metro Exodus Enhanced and Spider-Man: Miles Morales come anywhere near being playable. But going along with what we just said above, FSR 2 at least can push the RX 7600 well above 30 fps — Quality mode improved performance by 63%.

The only other ray tracing game in our test suite that supports FSR 2 is Cyberpunk 2077, and it provides a massive 150% boost to performance. But that's because the RX 7600 was absolutely choking while trying to run 1440p native. Anyway, the less said about 1440p ray tracing performance on the RX 7600, the better.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • atomicWAR
    Not great but not bad. Very 'meh' imho. At least its a cheap card for 1080P.
    Reply
  • colossusrage
    Reply
  • atomicWAR
    colossusrage said:
    Perfect response lol.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    As what I expected another pile of crap. One watt better than the old gen. Why spend sand on these... 199 dollar max for this graphics.

    @JarredWaltonGPU thanks for the review... hard time to you trying find somenthing good or new on these graphics
    Reply
  • salgado18
    AMD should have made a refresh of the RX 6650 XT and earn more money. If nothing really improved, then what's the point?
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Glad to see the last minute price drop, it definitely makes it a much more appealing product. Currently at newegg there are 5 rx 6650xt models available with an average price of $288 minus an average discount of $20. So more or less the same price as the rx 7600 mba. given that information, if I were in the market at that price range, I'd just grab the 7600 given they are more or less the same price once you factor in discounts. It still would've been nice to see a -600 class part match the last generation -700 class part in performance. Maybe we'll see that with a 7600 xt
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    Amdlova said:
    As what I expected another pile of crap. One watt better than the old gen. Why spend sand on these... 199 dollar max for this graphics.
    While it may not make sense for people who already own something from the last generation or two, plenty of people have 5+ years old GPUs or are building new with no half-decent GPU to spare.

    I'm still using a GTX1050, waiting for something decent to hit ~$260 CAN. I bought an open-box A750 for $270 a few weeks ago, ended up returning it as seemingly defective since it caused my PC to crash repeatedly.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Good deal at $270, thanks for the review Jarred.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    InvalidError said:
    While it may not make sense for people who already own something from the last generation or two, plenty of people have 5+ years old GPUs or are building new with no half-decent GPU to spare.

    I'm still using a GTX1050, waiting for something decent to hit ~$260 CAN. I bought an open-box A750 for $270 a few weeks ago, ended up returning it as seemingly defective since it caused my PC to crash repeatedly.
    People want a brilliant GPU and they wanna pay $250 for it, as if the whole pandemic, parts shortage and a historic inflation went over their head. This might sound like a radical idea, but mid-range starts at $500 now. :LOL:
    Reply
  • atomicWAR
    Elusive Ruse said:
    This might sound like a radical idea, but mid-range starts at $500 now. :LOL:
    Should it though?
    Reply