Roundup: Mainstream Graphics Cards From ATI And Nvidia
Features
By Tino Kreiss
published Graphics Chips Compared And Test Configuration
We used an Intel Core i7-920 CPU overclocked to 3.8 GHz for this round of graphics card testing.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Nvidia Graphics Cards | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Row 0 - Cell 0 | Codename | Graphics RAM | GPU Clock | Shader | Memory clock | SPs |
GeForce GTX 275 | GT200b | 896 GDDR3 | 633 MHz | 4.0, 1,404 MHz | 2 x 1,134 MHz | 240 |
GeForce GTX 260 | GT200b | 896 GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,242 MHz | 2 x 999 MHz | 216 |
GeForce GTX 260 | GT200 | 896 GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,242 MHz | 2 x 999 MHz | 192 |
GeForce GTS 250 | G92b | 1,024 MB GDDR3 | 740 MHz | 4.0, 1,836 MHz | 2 x 1,100 MHz | 128 |
GeForce 9800 GTX+ | G92b | 512 MB GDDR3 | 738 MHz | 4.0, 1,836 MHz | 2 x 1,100 MHz | 128 |
GeForce 9800 GTX | G92 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 675 MHz | 4.0, 1,688 MHz | 2 x 1,100 MHz | 128 |
Zotac GeForce 9800GT 512MB (9800 GT) | G92b | 512 MB GDDR3 | 660 MHz | 4.0, 1,600 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 112 |
GeForce 9800 GT | G92b | 512 MB GDDR3 | 600 MHz | 4.0, 1,512 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 112 |
GeForce 9600 GT | G94 | 1,024 MB GDDR3 | 650 MHz | 4.0, 1,625 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 64 |
GeForce 9600 GT | G94 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 650 MHz | 4.0, 1,625 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 64 |
GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | G92 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 650 MHz | 4.0, 1,625 MHz | 2 x 972 MHz | 128 |
GeForce 8800 GT | G92 | 1,024 MB GDDR3 | 600 MHz | 4.0, 1,500 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 112 |
GeForce 8800 GT | G92 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 600 MHz | 4.0, 1,500 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 112 |
GeForce 8800 Ultra | G80 | 768 MB GDDR3 | 612 MHz | 4.0, 1,512 MHz | 2 x 1,080 MHz | 128 |
GeForce 8800 GTX | G80 | 768 MB GDDR3 | 576 MHz | 4.0, 1,350 MHz | 2 x 900 MHz | 128 |
GeForce 8800 GTS | G80 | 640 MB GDDR3 | 513 MHz | 4.0, 1,188 MHz | 2 x 792 MHz | 96 |
GeForce 8800 GTS | G80 | 320 MB GDDR3 | 513 MHz | 4.0, 1,188 MHz | 2 x 792 MHz | 96 |
GeForce 8600 GTS | G84 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 675 MHz | 4.0, 1,450 MHz | 2 x 1,008 MHz | 32 |
Swipe to scroll horizontally
ATI Graphics Cards | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Row 0 - Cell 0 | Codename | Graphics RAM | GPU Clock | Shader | Memory clock | SPs |
Radeon HD 4890 | R790 | 1,024 MB GDDR5 | 850 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 975 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4870 | RV770 | 512 MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 900 MHz | 800 |
Radeon HD 4850 | RV770 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 625 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 993 MHz | 800 |
Sapphire HD 4830 512 MB (HD 4830) | RV770 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 575 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 900 MHz | 640 |
Radeon HD 4830 | RV770 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 575 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 900 MHz | 640 |
Sapphire HD 4770 512 MB (HD 4770) | RV740 | 512 MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 800 MHz | 640 |
Radeon HD 4770 | RV740 | 512 MB GDDR5 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 4 x 800 MHz | 640 |
HIS H467QT512P (HD 4670) CF | RV730 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 780 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 1,000 MHz | 320 |
Radeon HD 4670 CF | RV730 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 1,000 MHz | 320 |
HIS H467QT512P (HD 4670) | RV730 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 780 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 1,000 MHz | 320 |
HIS H467PS1GP (HD 4670) | RV730 | 1,024 MB GDDR3 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 850 MHz | 320 |
Radeon HD 4670 | RV730 | 512 MB GDDR3 | 750 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 1,000 MHz | 320 |
Radeon HD 3870 | RV670 | 512 MB GDDR4 | 776 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 1,125 MHz | 320 |
Radeon HD 3850 | RV670 | 256 MB GDDR3 | 668 MHz | 4.1 | 2 x 829 MHz | 320 |
Memory Clock = DDR clock rate x 2, DDR5 clock rate x 4, SPs = Stream Processors, CF = CrossFire parallel configuration with two ATI cards, Shader 2.0 = DirectX 9.0, 3.0 = DirectX 9.0c, 4.0 = DirectX 10, 4.1 = DirectX 10.1
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test PC Configuration | |
---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i7-920 @ 3.8 GHz (20 x 190), BIOS 1.2625 Volt, 45 nm, Socket 1366 LGA |
Motherboard | Asus P6T, PCIe 2.0, ICH10R, 3-Way SLI |
Chipset | Intel X58 |
Memory | Corsair, 3 x 2 GB DDR3, TR3X6G1600C8D, 2x570 MHz 8-8-8-20 |
Audio | Realtek ALC1200 |
LAN | Realtek RTL8111C |
HDDs | SATA, Western Digital, Raptor WD300HLFS, WD5000AAKS |
DVD | Gigabyte GO-D1600C |
Power Supply | Cooler Master RS-850-EMBA 850 Watt |
Drivers and Settings | |
Graphics | ATI Catalyst 9.6, Nvidia GeForce 186.18 |
OS | Windows Vista Ultimate 32 Bit, SP1 |
DirectX | 9, 10, and 10.1 |
Chipset Driver | Intel 9.1.0.1007 |
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Graphics Chips Compared And Test Configuration
Prev Page CrossFire With IceQ Is Very Quiet Next Page HIS H467PS1GP iSilence (Passively-Cooled Radeon HD 4670, 1,024 MB)More about gpus
74 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
Bloodblender All I can say is that Tom's recent articles have been an excellent read, and this exactly the stuff I (as well as many others) require for their research purposes. Keep up the great work!Reply -
dirtmountain Nice article,very well done, but you need to show the 4670 in CF as costing $162, not $81 as shown in the final chart.Reply -
rambo117 the iceQ concept is amazing. keeps my 3870s nice and chilly (70C) while hardcore gamingReply
and not to mention they both look intimidating in my case ;) -
to me the gaming benches are most important but energy efficiency and heat dissipation run a close 2nd. thanks for providing it all!Reply
-
Julianbreaker Newegg has quite a few 4850s that retail for $100 and it appears to be getting consistently better benchmarks than the 4770. I am confused as to why you would not recommend it over the 4770. Perhaps you are confused by simple maths.Reply -
radiowars PijQuick question - 4770 in crossfire or single 4890 best bet???..They already did a whole article on that...Reply -
bucifer I don't understand why you still won't use the 1GB version of the Radeon 4870. It's clear to me that the card is limited by it's amount of video memory when using hi-res, AA and AF.Reply
Searching for prices in US and Europe it retails cheaper than the GTX260(192 or 216).
The point is: the card should be included in the test just as the GTX260-216. It's clearly a better option than the 512 mb version and it's good for comparison! -
holodust Nice article, but I don't see how testing these cards on i7 920@3.8 fits into mainstream.Reply