New benchmarks, new test methods, and new hardware mark exciting updates to this month’s System Builder Marathon. Today, we cover the most exciting part of all: the value competition. Remember, we're giving all three systems away, so enter to win them!
Test Settings
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test Hardware Configurations
Row 0 - Cell 0
Current $500 PC
Current $1000 PC
Current $2000 PC
Motherboard (Overclock)
ASRock M3A770DE AMD 770, SB710O/C at 250 MHz RCLK
Asus Sabertooth 55i Intel P55 Express PCHO/C at 167 MHz BCLK
Gigabyte X58A-UD3R Intel X58, ICH10RO/C at 189 MHz BCLK
Processor (Overclock)
AMD Athlon II X3 445 3.1 GHz Triple-CoreO/C to 3.88 GHz, 1.40 V
Intel Core i3-550 3.2 GHz Dual-CoreO/C to 4.02 GHz, 1.35 V
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz, Quad-CoreO/C to 4.35 GHz, 1.40 V
Memory (Overclock)
6 GB Mushkin DDR3-1333 CAS 9-9-9-24, 1.50 VUnchanged
4 GB Geil DDR3-1333 CAS 7-7-7-24, U/C @1.50 V to DDR3-1004 7-7-7-24
6 GB Mushkin DDR3-1333 CAS 9-9-9-24, U/C @1.60 V to DDR3-1133 CL 7-6-7-18
I really enjoy these SBM articles but you need to start putting out these systems/articles faster because by the time you post these configs no one would build them. These "December" systems all use November parts. When you know an important part (CPU/GPU) is going to be replaced by a newer model before the article will post, just wait a few days for it.
That said, SSD is a great addition as well as some of the other difficult to measure in value parts.
Your 'flexible' statistics are a joke! We'd really like the $2000 system to win to so we'll shovel in the hard drive figures with massive over-emphasis... It's bollocks.
I don't understand introducing SSDs into these builds. Buying an SSD is a binary decision: if you want faster load times, you add an SSD . . . if not, you don't.
These builds are targeted at a fixed budget, and (at the moment, with these budgets) money should never be spent on an SSD at the expense of more cpu or graphics power.
Dropping SSDs would also stop convoluting the "value" comparison.
82% performance at half the cost? 500 USD build for me, thanks. I can add a 100 bucks SSD anytime (and they'll just keep dropping). Newegg has some nice, cheap SSDs out there...
This has been a very informative triple build review, and this article sums up the lessons nicely! The point about the $1000 PC and games being fine with dual cores was gratifying to see echoed in the summation.
The fact that problems were encountered during the builds, such as the issue with memory, and the issue with the bios; these are important practical lessons that make the articles well worth the time to read.
Overall, I can't imagine a better choice of builds, nor a better outcome, given Sandy Bridge on the horizon.
How about timing the marathon differently. It seemas doing it at the end of the quarter isn't such a good idea because of new tech launch schedules this half of the year. Maybe release the article in the middle of every quarter?
In any case, the $500 build rocks my boat. I just feel it isn't right to saddle the $1000 build with a dual core, hyper-threaded or not. An AMD triple/quad core with bad-@ss cooling (at the same price) might have been better.
canting_dissentorYour 'flexible' statistics are a joke! We'd really like the $2000 system to win to so we'll shovel in the hard drive figures with massive over-emphasis... It's bollocks.d00d, that's what a bunch of readers wanted. We all know that SSDs waste money for most users, but the site was overwhelmed by readers who claimed they couldn't wait for four seconds on a process that should open in three.