On The Bench: EVGA GeForce GTX 460 FTW
EVGA is currently selling the fastest GeForce GTX 460 available, and yet this board didn't make it into our Radeon HD 6800 coverage, just to keep things fair. Now we're back with a look at how an overclocked 460 compares to the GTX 470 and Radeon HD 6870.
Test System And Benchmarks
We’re including a number of cards in our benchmarks. From AMD, we have the Radeon HD 6850 and 6870. From Nvidia, the GeForce GTX 460 and 470, in addition to EVGA’s factory overclocked GTX460 FTW, of course.
As described in our Radeon HD 6800 launch article, the majority of GeForce GTX 460 cards on the market are at least slightly overclocked beyond the reference specification. To make sure the benchmarks reflect what's available for purchase, we averaged out the clocks for the seven cheapest models we could find for a fair representation of the GeForce GTX 460 playing field. As a result, we are benchmarking the GeForce GTX 460 1 GB at 708/1416 MHz core/shader speeds for our tests, a 33 MHz increase over the original reference core clock. This increase is so low that, frankly, it will probably have no measurable impact on our results. It does seem like the fair thing to do, though. The memory runs at the reference 900 MHz GDDR5 clock, as even overclocked models tend to leave memory at reference speeds.
It's also worth noting that most Radeon HD 6870s currently available ship at reference clock rates. There are a handful of 13 and 20 MHz speed bumps, and a couple of 40 MHz increases that command higher prices. However, for the folks ready to hit the comments section with, "Sure, compare overclocked Nvidia hardware to stock AMD cards," bear in mind that this is representative of today's retail landscape.
Header Cell - Column 0 | Test System |
---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i7-920 (Nehalem), 2.67 GHz, QPI-4200, 8 MB CacheOverclocked to 3.61 GHz @ 172 MHz BCLK |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X58A-UD3R Intel X58, BIOS version FA |
Networking | Onboard Gigabit LAN controller |
Memory | Mushkin PC3-10700H 3 x 2048 MB, DDR3-1376, CL 10-10-10-25-1T |
Graphics | HIS Radeon HD 68701 GB GDDR5MSI N6870Radeon HD 6870, 1 GB GDDR5HIS Radeon HD 68501 GB GDDR5Radeon HD 6850 Reference1 GB GDDR5EVGA GeForce GTX 460 FTW EditionGeForce GTX 460, 1 GB GDDR5850/1700/1000 MHz core/shader/memory clocks(also representing typical GeForce GTX 460 1 GB @ 708/1416/900 MHz core/shader/memory clocks)Galaxy GeForce GTX 4701280 MB GDDR5(all clock rates have been set to reference specifications for the purpose of benchmarking) |
Hard Drive | Western Digital Caviar WD50 00AAJS-00YFA, 500 GB, 7200 RPM, 8 MB cache, SATA 3Gb/s |
Power | Thermaltake Toughpower 1200 W1200 W, ATX 12V 2.2, EPS 12v 2.91 |
Software and Drivers | |
Operating System | Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit |
DirectX version | DirectX 11 |
Graphics Drivers | AMD Catalyst 10.10 Beta, Nvidia GeForce Driver 260.89 WHQL |
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Test System And Benchmarks
Prev Page EVGA Overclocks The GeForce GTX 460 Next Page Benchmark Results: 3DMark Vantage And Unigine Heaven-
fstrthnu Heh, "FTW". Still, EVGA's done a pretty impressive job here. Still a standby till the Geforce GTX 560 comes, but this is pretty darn good heading into winterReply -
macer1 Why not use the 10.12 beta drivers from AMD ?Reply
The current test used a 10.10 Beta driver which was more problematic then the 10.9 AMD drivers. Makes no sense to me. -
touchdowntexas13 Typically I think factory overclocked cards are a waste of cash, but this seems like a pretty good value. I am very happy with my GTX 470, but if I could do it over I would of snatched up that GTX 460! The 470 is just so loud and hot. But it's whatever. The 460 didn't come out until 3 months after I bought the 470.Reply -
Tamz_msc It'd be nice if Nvidia released a card sporting GF104 GPU and all eight streaming multiprocessors enabled, just to see what it can do.
Bombard the the HD 6950? Maybe at a lesser price? Keeping my fingers crossed for the GTX 560 :D -
IzzyCraft macer1Why not use the 10.12 beta drivers from AMD ? The current test used a 10.10 Beta driver which was more problematic then the 10.9 AMD drivers. Makes no sense to me.Because articles take time to write esp when you need to benchmark things.Reply -
rohitbaran Well, this doesn't sound too good for AMD. A fully enable GTX 460, which will probably launch as GX560 will probably come close enough, if not equal to the Radeon 6950.Reply -
IzzyCraft RandomactsReally?? A bumper sticker??? hahah... wow..They didn't have enough fun tricking me into putting lame stickers on my expensive case when i was young so now they want me to put lame stickers on my car.Reply