China proposes mandatory red flags placed on all AI-generated content posted online
The notoriously strict Cyberspace Administration of China wants to regulate generative AI.
On Saturday, the Cyberspace Administration of China announced a likely-to-be-enforced draft plan to enforce mandatory red-flagging of all generative AI content posted online in China [h/t The Register]. Flagging methods include audible disclaimers in audio files, visible watermarks in images, and notices spread throughout the video. Users who don't flag their AI content may still have it flagged anyway, based on metadata or its absence.
The primary purpose of this being a "draft" plan until October, despite the fact that China will enforce this as it pleases, seems to be to give platforms a chance to prepare since the public comments will likely not factor into the final version of this plan. As The Register points out in its coverage, widespread regulation like this (particularly in censorship) is typical of how China treats the Internet— but that doesn't necessarily make this a bad idea.
However, generative AI and its loudest proponents are openly seeking to replace skilled labor and artists however they possibly can, and mandatory disclaimers that what you're posting is, in fact, AI-generated and not the fruits of your labor might be...a good thing?
Several ongoing lawsuits relate to generative AI here in the U.S. and elsewhere. Public comments from the likes of OpenAI's Sam Altman openly state that it's "impossible" to create AI tools without using copyrighted material—something we in the universe where we still have to work for our money recognize as copyright infringement.
At this point, the cat's out of the bag, so the technology will almost certainly stay— but in its current and near-unregulated form, where it's almost purely destructive to the environment and skilled workers and shows unprecedented power demand? That seems unlikely. At least in China, passing off generative AI's work as your own will be near-impossible before the end of the year.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.
-
Notton Honestly, not a bad idea, but I would hope such a law has safeguards in place for false positives.Reply
If anyone remembers how shockingly good deep fake voice content was. -
hotaru251 Should be a global thing & props to China for going after a simple & straight forward rule.Reply -
usertests mandatory disclaimers that what you're posting is, in fact, AI-generated and not the fruits of your labor might be...a good thing?
No, and get replaced. -
bit_user
LOL, it's Sam Altman.The article said:Public comments from the likes of OpenAI's Sam Whitman ...
@TheyCallMeContra , maybe you were thinking Meg Whitman? IDK, she's been out of the picture for a while.
Huh, I had no idea she was involved in Quibi (i.e. the failed streaming platform), though I'm not surprised to learn that she was. -
bit_user
I have yet to hear one that doesn't sound like a payphone call, in terms of audio quality. That seems like it ought to be a solvable problem, though.Notton said:If anyone remembers how shockingly good deep fake voice content was.
Seems only possible when you aren't guaranteed freedom of speech. In the USA, freedom of speech is also interpreted to mean freedom from being compelled to speak (by the government), which a requirement of such disclaimers might run afoul of. I think we'll find out, before too long.hotaru251 said:Should be a global thing & props to China for going after a simple & straight forward rule. -
TheyCallMeContra
oops! thanks for the catch, lolbit_user said:LOL, it's Sam Altman.
@TheyCallMeContra , maybe you were thinking Meg Whitman? IDK, she's been out of the picture for a while.
Huh, I had no idea she was involved in Quibi (i.e. the failed streaming platform), though I'm not surprised to learn that she was. -
TheyCallMeContra usertests said:No, and get replaced.
you're cringe and you should feel cringe for thinking AI should replace humans who actually know what they're doing and what they're talking about. OpenAI can't even count the number of Rs in the word "strawberry" correctly, much less Actually test its instructions or experience genuine emotion or original thought.
it reminds me of a Shel Silverstein poem called "Homework Machine". lazy parasites will always look for shortcuts, but plagiarism machines are fundamentally incapable of duplicating human perspective or human experience and literally rely on openly stealing everyone else's content to even function. even if it somehow worked perfectly— and it clearly doesn't— there's a very blatant moral and ethical shortcoming here.
and that's before we even start talking about the unmitigated environmental impact of a genAI bubble that seemingly exists purely to make the world a worse place for pretty much everybody but lazy slobs and tech CEOS.