'Doomer science fiction': Nvidia blasts proposed US bill that would force it to give American buyers 'first option' in AI GPU purchases before selling chips to other countries, including allies — GAIN AI Act debuts in defense spending bill

Nvidia Hopper H100 die shot
(Image credit: Nvidia)

Update 9/4/2025 05:28 am PT: An Nvidia spokesperson has reached out and provided this comment.

"The AI Diffusion Rule was a self-defeating policy, based on doomer science fiction, and should not be revived. Our sales to customers worldwide do not deprive U.S. customers of anything — and in fact expand the market for many U.S. businesses and industries. The pundits feeding fake news to Congress about chip supply are attempting to overturn President Trump's AI Action Plan and surrender America's chance to lead in AI and computing worldwide."

"Advanced AI chips are the jet engine that is going to enable the U.S. AI industry to lead for the next decade," said Brad Carson, president of Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI). "Globally, these chips are currently supply-constrained, which means that every advanced chip sold abroad is a chip the U.S. cannot use to accelerate American R&D and economic growth. As we compete to lead on this dual-use technology, including the GAIN AI Act in the NDAA would be a major win for U.S. economic competitiveness and national security."

This GAIN AI Act demands developers of AI processors, such as AMD or Nvidia, to give U.S. buyers first opportunity to purchase advanced AI hardware before selling to foreign nations, including allied nations like European countries or the U.K. and adversaries like China. To do so, the Act proposes to establish export controls on all 'advanced' GPUs (more on this later) to be shipped outside of the U.S. and deny export licenses on the 'most powerful chips.'

To get the export license, the exporter must confirm to certain conditions:

  • U.S. customers received a right to decline first;
  • There is no backlog of pending U.S. orders;
  • The intended export will not cause stock delays or reduce manufacturing capacity for U.S. purchasers;
  • Pricing or contract terms being offered do not favor foreign recipients over U.S. customers;
  • The export will not be used by foreign entities to undercut U.S. competitors outside of their domestic market.

If one of the certifications is missing, the export request must be denied, according to the proposal.

What is perhaps no less important about the act is that it sets precise criteria of what U.S. legislators consider 'advanced integrated circuit,' or advanced AI GPU. To qualify as 'advanced', a processor has meet any one of the following criteria:

  • Offers a total processing performance (TPP) score of 2400 or higher, which is counted as listed processing power in TFLOPS multiplied by the length of operation (e.g., TFLOPS or TOPS of 8/16/32/64 bits) without sparsity. Processors with a TPP of 4800 or higher are considered too powerful to be exported regardless of destination country.
  • Offers performance density (PD) metric of over 3.2. PD is counted by dividing TPP by the die area measured in square millimeters.
  • Has DRAM bandwidth of over 1.4 TB/s, interconnect bandwidth of over 1.1 TB/s, or combined DRAM and interconnect bandwidth of over 1.7 TB/s.

Essentially, the legislators plan to export control all fairly sophisticated processors, including Nvidia's HGX H20 (because of high memory bandwidth) or L2 PCIe (because of high performance density) that are now about two years old. As a result, if the proposed bill passes as a law and is signed by the President, then it will again restrict sales of AMD's Instinct MI308 or Nvidia's HGX H20 both to all customers outside of the U.S. Furthermore, GPUs with a TPP of 4800 or higher will be prohibited for exports, so Nvidia will be unable to sell its H100 and more advaced GPUs outside of the U.S. as even H100 has a TPP score of 16,000 (B300 has a TPP score of 60,000).

Coincidentally, Nvidia on Wednesday issued a statement claiming that shipments of its H20 to customers in China does not affect its ability to serve clients in the U.S.

"The rumor that H20 reduced our supply of either H100/H200 or Blackwell is also categorically false — selling H20 has no impact on our ability to supply other NVIDIA products," the statement reads.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • usertests
    As long as those Americans aren't gamers, hehe.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    Calling it a “major win” sounds good, but let’s be real….the NDAA isn’t some blank slate for economic policy, it’s about defense, and half the time it ends up being a vehicle for importing China made components back into our own supply chain.

    Jamming the GAIN AI Act in there blurs the line between genuine national security priorities and just stapling buzzwords onto a defense bill.

    If we actually want AI leadership, it should be pursued as civilian innovation….not buried in a defense package that often does the opposite of reducing reliance on China.
    Reply
  • mikerahl
    Given the rapid decline of the American "empire", Nvidia should remove any corporate HQs they have in the US overseas, then simply reject any US controls of export licenses. Seek out support from China and ignore US export restrictions, selling to whoever wants their technology. Equally good would be to stop using the US dollar for any sales to non-US jurisdictions.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Loadedaxe said:
    .the NDAA isn’t some blank slate for economic policy, it’s about defense, and half the time it ends up being a vehicle for importing China made components back into our own supply chain.
    except given current global situation acts like this will get retaliated against (its happened recently even) which only hurts the non big tech/mega corps in end.


    mikerahl said:
    Given the rapid decline of the American "empire", Nvidia should remove any corporate HQs they have in the US overseas, then simply reject any US controls of export licenses. Seek out support from China and ignore US export restrictions, selling to whoever wants their technology. Equally good would be to stop using the US dollar for any sales to non-US jurisdictions.
    literally impossible as the copyrights/trademarks are filed under US and they couldnt do what you suggest. (for any company to relocate is a massive amount of hoops and when you are an effective monopoly of high end tech? it'd never be allowed)
    Reply
  • gg83
    I think Intel and AMD should gang up on Nvidia and make something great! Not like it would happen, but they have the resources and the US government might give them a ton of investment cash.
    Reply