U.S. and China agree on one-year tariff truce, including semiconductor and rare earth breakthroughs — future of Nvidia AI chip sales to the nation remains murky

Trump and Xi Jinping
(Image credit: Getty / Andrew Harnik)

In momentous news for the global trade war and the global semiconductor industry, President Trump and China's Xi Jinping have reportedly agreed on a one-year tariff truce that could pave the way for a lasting easing of tensions between the two nations. As reported by the New York Times, the pair met at an airport in the South Korean city of Busan, which finally brought some clarity and de-escalation to the ongoing trade war between the two superpowers.

According to the report, the two have reached " a series of agreements that broke little new ground but unwound thorny issues that had been plaguing negotiations for a lasting trade deal."

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Stephen Warwick
News Editor

Stephen is Tom's Hardware's News Editor with almost a decade of industry experience covering technology, having worked at TechRadar, iMore, and even Apple over the years. He has covered the world of consumer tech from nearly every angle, including supply chain rumors, patents, and litigation, and more. When he's not at work, he loves reading about history and playing video games.

  • QuarterSwede
    Ah, the sell portion of stock market manipulation. Gross.
    Reply
  • alrighty_then
    Great news that a deal was struck. If anything prevents war between the US and China over Tiawan it will be shared economic interests.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    alrighty_then said:
    Great news that a deal was struck.
    It just resets things almost back to how they were near the beginning of the year. I don't see any real progress on any of the issues that started this whole tariff and trade sanctions back-and-forth.

    Also, it was almost a foregone conclusion that some sort of climb-down would happen, before the 100% tariffs were meant to hit.

    alrighty_then said:
    If anything prevents war between the US and China over Tiawan it will be shared economic interests.
    China grows less dependent on the US with every passing year. Also, the US will not go to war over Taiwan.
    Reply
  • scottsoapbox
    A temporary solution to a self created problem. Huzzah.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Methinks the point of tariffs is leverage for negotiation.

    It seems to be working?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    SomeoneElse23 said:
    Methinks the point of tariffs is leverage for negotiation.

    It seems to be working?
    In response, China simply created their own points of leverage, such as the restriction on rare earths, tariffs on US agricultural products, and closing their markets to GPUs from the US.

    The fundamental problem here is that the US is more dependent on China than it is on the US. So, it's really hard to find a point of leverage against China that it can't counter and that won't do too much damage to the US (e.g. 100%+ tariffs). The only possible way to do it might've been a coalition of some sort, but that ship has sailed.

    Towards that latter point, 70% of the countries in the world are more dependent on trade with China than they are with the US. So, when forced to choose sides, they will tend to side with China.
    Reply
  • shady28
    The answer to "Why?" (and this is by no means anywhere near a complete list) :

    GE Appliances: Shifting production of refrigerators, gas ranges, and water heaters from China (and Mexico) to expanded plants in Kentucky, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, and South Carolina as part of a $3 billion investment. This is expected to create over 1,000 new jobs and began ramping up in mid-2025.
    Cra-Z-Art: Expanding US production capacity by 50% for toys and school supplies to offset tariffs on imports from China, with operations scaling up in US facilities starting in spring 2025.
    Apple: Committing over $500 billion to expand US manufacturing across states like Arizona, Texas, and North Carolina, including a new Houston factory for servers. This includes shifting some component and assembly work previously done in China, with expansions announced and underway since early 2025.
    Fuyao Glass (Chinese company): Relocating glass manufacturing operations to a $1 billion facility in Moraine, Ohio, aiming to employ 3,000 workers. The move, which reduces reliance on Chinese production, was finalized and began operations in 2025.
    Tianyuan Garments Co. (Chinese company): Moving clothing manufacturing for brands like Adidas and Armani to a $20 million facility in Little Rock, Arkansas, planning to hire 400 workers. The plant opened in 2025, shifting production previously based in China.
    Sun Paper Industry (Chinese company): Establishing a $1 billion bio-products mill for paper manufacturing in South Arkansas, creating 250 jobs. This reshoring effort from China started construction and initial operations in 2025.
    Luxshare (Chinese Apple supplier): Shifting electronics and component manufacturing (e.g., for Apple products) outside China, including new investments in US facilities to avoid tariffs. Expansions were announced in early 2025 and are progressing.
    Nvidia: For the first time, manufacturing AI chips (Blackwell series) and supercomputers in the US, with over a million square feet of new space in Arizona and Texas. This moves some production previously reliant on Asian suppliers (including China) to domestic sites, starting in 2025.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    shady28 said:
    The answer to "Why?" (and this is by no means anywhere near a complete list) :
    There will be winners and losers in any policy environment. While tariffs create incentives to on-shore manufacturing, they also hurt existing domestic manufacturers by increasing input costs, which makes their products less viable to export.

    The only way to know whether a policy achieved the desired outcome is to look at overall market data, in the years to come. Especially because anything that companies are saying or promising today isn't written in stone. That's even more true, while trade/tariff policy is still in flux.

    I will say that I'm glad the administration finally got behind Intel and seems to be focusing on securing domestic supply-chain of semiconductor manufacturing. I care less about whether the mechanism is CHIPS or something else, than I do about self-sufficiency in this area. I expect this will be even more important, in the years to come. However, I think the market data isn't going to tell the whole story, here. This is more about on-shoring vital supply chains, IMO.
    Reply
  • fiyz
    QuarterSwede said:
    Ah, the sell portion of stock market manipulation. Gross.
    My man! Calling it like it is. I hope you and your kin live long and healthy lives, the world needs more people like you.
    Reply