Grok targeted in UK law over sexually-explicit AI image generation — UK will begin prosecuting illegal prompting this week
Musk's tools might be on the verge of a nationwide ban.
The British government has just announced it will criminalize creating non-consensual AI-generated images from this week, calling them "weapons of abuse." Sharing deepfakes is already illegal in the UK, but the law to enforce prosecution against those creating/requesting them will go into effect just now. This decision comes on the heels of Grok dishing out sexually explicit imagery of minors on X.
"The Data (Use and Access) Act passed last year made it a criminal offence to create or request the creation of non-consensual intimate images, and today I can announce to the House that this offence will be brought into force this week." — Liz Kendall, Technology Secretary.
Over the past few weeks, the failing guardrails of Elon Musk's AI chatbot have sparked global outrage, prompting the UK's communication watchdog, Ofcom, to launch a formal investigation into the matter. If found guilty, Ofcom holds the power to severely fine Grok — up to 10% of applicable global revenue — along with a court-approved outright ban of the service.
Indonesia and Malaysia have already blocked Grok access in their respective regions, while Musk has criticized Downing Street's intense reaction as fascist and accused the government of censorship, something that Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney also agrees with. Conversely, Liz Kendall has said, "The content which has circulated on X is vile. It's not just an affront to decent society, it is illegal."
Hi @ElonMusk can you do something about the pedos asking grok to put bikinis on literal children?!PROTECT NELL FISHER!! pic.twitter.com/bGeXpCArn3January 3, 2026
Musk added the ability to generate images using artificial intelligence to Grok last year. While the dedicated Grok app allows you to take these operations private, it's the public-facing image manipulation on X that has lit the fire. Any image uploaded on the platform can be turned explicit with just a simple @Grok request, with the AI chatbot replying with the edited image right there.
Such invasion of privacy would already make heads turn, but it was the fact that Grok failed to even distinguish between adult and children that crossed the line, and freely generated intimate content featuring minors on X. Most recently, a picture of a then 13-year-old Stranger Things actor was tweaked to show them in bikini, pushing the service into criminal territory.
"Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content," said Elon Musk a few days ago, adding that unlawful imagery is taken down immediately in accordance with local authorities. Grok was also pushed behind a paywall with only X Premium subscribers being able to access the service.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Targeting the problem "at its source" shows that both apps and the individuals using them will be held accountable, and that it's a "priority offence" in the Online Safety Act. For now, X and Grok remain up until Ofcom presents its findings. Musk is free to come forward and change policies in the meantime, before a verdict is reached, to potentially ease the regulator's scrutiny.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
passivecool This is such a difficult and nuanced topic.Reply
It has been smashed down upon society before even 25% know what it is all about.
should i be allowed to capture snapshot pic of anyone, anywhere and be able, be allowed, to post an AI sex video thereof online?
If you say yes, then pls send me your photo.
I have never tried such things yet, but I am happy to ruin your rep and destroy your professional existence. Never thought about it before, but with a little practice it shouldn't take more than a few tokens and half an hour. -
TheWerewolf Reply
Two wrongs do not make a right.nrdwka said:some of Renaissance painter done the same things ...🤔🤷♂️🙈
Just saying
Just saying -
TheWerewolf There are four different things here all kind of conflated.Reply
Generating sexualised images of a person without consent which is a massive privacy violation.
Generating sexualised images of a minor (who cannot give consent for this BTW - it's literally called "the age of consent" for this reason) which is a massive privacy violation AND child abuse. One can argue that a depiction of a nonreal person should be ok, but there are problems that creates - like accidentally generating an image too similar to an actual person.
Generating random sexualised imagery of entirely fictional adult entities engaging in violent, non-consensual or harmful activities which is more complicated but violence is not exactly healthy.
All other forms of generation of sexualised imagery of entirely fictional adult entities which if you disapprove, is kind of a "you" problem (assuming no trademark or copyright violations).Also, there's a question of what constitutes "sexualised". If I'm painting a beach scene and have kids in bathing suits, that's not a sexual image for most people. Context is, as always, everything. -
blppt Yeah, I'm sure Elon is in danger of being arrested.Reply
That's the real problem here---this kind of stuff would never make it to live usage if the head honcho has any danger of going to jail. -
Notton Though I applaud the UK for leading the charge against pdf files and CSAM...Reply
Let me guess, the investigators will hit a few snags, because let's be honest, you aren't allowed to touch the Elite, Royalty, or their property. Especially in the UK. -
Geef There will always be bad people doing bad things everywhere. That does not mean you should make it illegal for everyone else.Reply
---
I wonder if it could be turned around for politicians? There are bad politicians who do bad things with the power they are given. Lets make it illegal to be a politician... ;) -
Bikki When will all the people who post their bikini photos online get arrested? Man i guess anyone who’s ever went to a beach is complicit.Reply -
shadowofward Reply
Indeed, one can find numerous examples in history where censorship of art and thought has always helped society. What is art anyways?passivecool said:This is such a difficult and nuanced topic.