Huawei reportedly facing bad AI chip yields for processors made at Chinese fab SMIC: Report

AI Accelerator
(Image credit: Huawei)

Huawei is encountering significant difficulties in expanding the production of its Ascend 910B AI processors due to insufficient yields at Semiconductor Manufacturing International Co. (SMIC), reports Chosun.biz, a Korean business daily. This impacts Huawei's ability to develop its artificial intelligence business and highlights China's inability to be self-sufficient in terms of advanced chip manufacturing. 

The Ascend 910B, Huawei's second-generation AI processor, was designed to substitute for Nvidia's AI processors (primarily A100), which dominated over 90% of the Chinese market. However, production efficiency remains extremely low, as only 20% of chips that SMIC produces operate as intended.

It should be noted that nearly all large processors made today have defects, but this doesn't render them unusable. Modern chips are designed to tolerate a varying number of manufacturing defects—vendors merely disable cores or other features to make the chip usable despite the defect. 

Different automatic translators (e.g., Google Translate, ChatGPT) translate a phrase in the Korean report about defective Ascend 910Bs differently: some translate that four out of five processors are defective (i.e., they cannot be used), others translate that four out of five have defects (i.e., they can be used with some cores disabled or at lower clocks). We cannot be 100% sure about the interpretation or that the reporter who was given the information understood the context of the statement. It's safe to assume that Ascend 910B's yields at SMIC aren't progressing as expected, but a 20% total yield makes it financially unreasonable to produce these processors anyway, so we don't think they are that low. 

Huawei's Ascend 910B is reportedly made using SMIC's second-gen 7nm-class process technology. This production node is also used for Huawei's HiSilicon Kirin 9000S smartphone application processor. Since this system-on-chip is considerably smaller than the Ascend 910B, its yields should be considerably higher at the same defect density. 

Huawei's Ascend 910 and 910B are pretty large multi-chiplet processors. The die size of the main Ascend 910 chiplet (the Vetruvian) was 456 mm^2, which makes it a very large processor. It is likely that the main SoC of the Ascend 910B is slightly larger, which makes it particularly hard to yield. Yet, it is unlikely that its yield are as low as 20%. An educated guess would be that 20% of the Ascend 910B chips are perfectly fine, and then many of the remaining 80% can be binned and made to work, albeit at lower performance.

Unlike TSMC and Samsung Foundry, which use EUV lithography tools to make chips using advanced process technologies, SMIC has to rely on multi-patterning and DUV lithography machines. These require more production steps, increasing costs and the likelihood of defects and further straining production capacities. 

U.S. sanctions are exacerbating these issues by restricting the supply of advanced wafer fab tools and spare parts for advanced DUV lithography tools that SMIC already has. Consequently, maintenance and repair of manufacturing equipment have become problematic, the report says. SMIC lacks sufficient engineers to manage and maintain its semiconductor machinery. Additionally, global equipment suppliers, wary of U.S. sanctions, are reluctant to service advanced machines sold in China, leading to more frequent equipment failures and defective chips. 

Looking ahead, Huawei plans to tape out an even more advanced Ascend 910C in September and introduce AI processors using a 5nm process next year. However, given the ongoing equipment and supply chain issues, the company is expected to face similar challenges in scaling up production for these new processors. 

These production difficulties have broader implications for major Chinese tech companies like Tencent and Baidu, which rely on Huawei AI processors as alternatives to restricted Nvidia chips. However, SMIC's supposed inability to achieve expected yields with larger processors using its second-gen 7nm process technology casts doubt on China’s aspirations for semiconductor self-sufficiency.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • The Historical Fidelity
    20% yield rates sounds about right.
    Reply
  • izmanq
    Admin said:
    Huawei is encountering significant difficulties in expanding the production of its Ascend 910B AI processors due to insufficient yields at Semiconductor Manufacturing International Co. (SMIC), reports Chosun.biz, a Korean business daily.

    Huawei reportedly facing bad AI chip yields for processors made at Chinese fab SMIC: Report : Read more
    hmm, is this fact, or just opinion, huawei is selling all those large amount of mobile phone with 20% yield ?
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    izmanq said:
    hmm, is this fact, or just opinion, huawei is selling all those large amount of mobile phone with 20% yield ?
    Yes the yields are that bad, Huawei is heavily subsidized by the CCP.
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    izmanq said:
    hmm, is this fact, or just opinion, huawei is selling all those large amount of mobile phone with 20% yield ?


    the yield goes down as chip size grows, for a Chip that is as large as 456mm^2, 20% yield isn't bad actually.

    as this graph represents:
    source: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/chiplet
    Huawei's Kirin 9000S has a die size of 107mm^2, so naturally it will have maybe 3X better yield rate than this gigantic Ascend 910B chip, so if 910B can have 20% yield, then Huawei can definitely mass produce their phone SoCs with 60%+ yield, which is totally fine.
    Reply
  • nookoool
    What is tsmc/samsung etc yielding for similar size cpus?
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    nookoool said:
    What is tsmc/samsung etc yielding for similar size cpus?
    I believe the latest yield reports for TSMC indicate better than 95% for their 3nm process.
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    with open sources, at least Apple had their A17 chips with ~55% yield with TSMC 3nm node, but that was 1 year ago.

    https://technode.com/2023/07/17/tsmcs-3nm-yield-rate-reportedly-just-55-with-apple-only-paying-for-qualified-circuits/
    with that yield rate (obviously not ideal for TSMC, compared to other nodes), TSMC's price per wafer upped by 22% six months later, so I would guess that even if yield improves it would still be lower than their initial expectation.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/newer-chips-are-rapidly-becoming-far-more-expensive-tsmcs-average-wafer-price-jumped-22-in-one-year-and-nearly-all-semiconductor-industry-growth-now-comes-from-more-expensive-products
    I couldn't find the size of A17 chip...but A15, which is 107 mm^2, is almost identical to Kirin 9000S. so if A17 shares the same size, then it's safe to say that Huawei enjoys a similar yield compared to Apple.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    zsydeepsky said:
    with open sources, at least Apple had their A17 chips with ~55% yield with TSMC 3nm node, but that was 1 year ago.

    https://technode.com/2023/07/17/tsmcs-3nm-yield-rate-reportedly-just-55-with-apple-only-paying-for-qualified-circuits/
    with that yield rate (obviously not ideal for TSMC, compared to other nodes), TSMC's price per wafer upped by 22% six months later, so I would guess that even if yield improves it would still be lower than their initial expectation.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/newer-chips-are-rapidly-becoming-far-more-expensive-tsmcs-average-wafer-price-jumped-22-in-one-year-and-nearly-all-semiconductor-industry-growth-now-comes-from-more-expensive-products
    I couldn't find the size of A17 chip...but A15, which is 107 mm^2, is almost identical to Kirin 9000S. so if A17 shares the same size, then it's safe to say that Huawei enjoys a similar yield compared to Apple.
    That’s TSMC’s original N3 process which half way through development realized was a dead end and they stopped all further refinement after reaching initial production, essentially TSMC only released N3 to fulfill contract obligations with Apple. N3E was a ground up redesign and solved many yield problems encountered with the original N3. The original risk start yield rate for N3E in 2022 was >80%, 2 years later the yield rate is ~95%.
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/leaked-tsmc-slide-shows-n3e-yields-progressing-ahead-of-plan
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    zsydeepsky said:
    with open sources, at least Apple had their A17 chips with ~55% yield with TSMC 3nm node, but that was 1 year ago.

    https://technode.com/2023/07/17/tsmcs-3nm-yield-rate-reportedly-just-55-with-apple-only-paying-for-qualified-circuits/
    with that yield rate (obviously not ideal for TSMC, compared to other nodes), TSMC's price per wafer upped by 22% six months later, so I would guess that even if yield improves it would still be lower than their initial expectation.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/newer-chips-are-rapidly-becoming-far-more-expensive-tsmcs-average-wafer-price-jumped-22-in-one-year-and-nearly-all-semiconductor-industry-growth-now-comes-from-more-expensive-products
    I couldn't find the size of A17 chip...but A15, which is 107 mm^2, is almost identical to Kirin 9000S. so if A17 shares the same size, then it's safe to say that Huawei enjoys a similar yield compared to Apple.
    Also you can’t really compare the yield rates of SMIC 7nm with TSMC 3nm as 3nm is bleeding edge technology and 7nm is approaching legacy status.
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    Also you can’t really compare the yield rates of SMIC 7nm with TSMC 3nm as 3nm is bleeding edge technology and 7nm is approaching legacy status.
    you think that SMIC can't improve their yield as well?
    just pointing out that whatever Huawei & SMIC were doing, they were doing them quite normally.
    you don't have to bring your political sentiment into this.
    Reply