Widely ridiculed Intel stock buyer who invested $700,000 inheritance has the last laugh (if they held) as it nearly triples in value — investment is now worth around $1.89 million
Sadly, the user has left Reddit, so doesn’t have the chance to publicly gloat.
In August 2024, a Redditor was widely, repeatedly, and mercilessly ridiculed for investing the majority of an $800,000 inheritance in Intel stock, but given that the company just notched an all-time stock price high today, they may have the last laugh. Sadly for our thoughtful investor, their initial timing wasn’t the best, as pretty shortly after their $700,000 investment at $30.45 per share became… much smaller. Later in the same week, Intel's share values collapsed to under $20. It was a tragedy to see Grandma's life savings evaporate so quickly, with many wisecrackers rubbing salt in the wound. The Redditor has since vanished and deleted their profile. However, it looks like the $700K investor’s story will have a happy ending, and they will have the last laugh, if they did indeed hold.
I bought $700k worth of Intel stock today from r/wallstreetbets
Assuming the purchase price of $30.45 per share in the original post, and $700,000 invested, they could sell the lot for ~$1,885,000 later today (if the current $82 per share sticks).
While the Redditor’s post remains, the username is deleted. That’s understandable with the sheer amount of commenters we can see with 20-20 hindsight, clearly enjoying themselves at another’s loss.
The original r/wallstreetbets post was brimming with reasoning, logic, and positivity for Intel as an investment. True then, and now, the investment did put a lot of eggs in one tech basket, though.
The ‘bet’ quickly became a losing one. Grandma’s legacy would shrink as the news flow for Intel at the time was dire. The iconic PC chipmaker faced a string of weak guidance, missed expectations, and strategic turmoil. Competitive pressure was growing, too, and INTC’s direction seemed to be out of touch and missing the opportunity of the great AI wave.
In early August 2024, we reported on the chipmaker suspending its dividend and stock dropping 30% overnight. This was very soon after the headlining $700,000 investment. Other troubling issues we reported on at Intel during the same month include its possible loss of foundry business for SoftBank’s AI chips, various large reductions in staff, and AMD’s best server CPU market share in decades.
It would take a year of scrambling for Intel to make its way out of the doldrums, as the stock charts show. From August 2025, we have seen Intel shares relentlessly gain value, from under $20, and at the time of writing at $82.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Our inheritance investor originally claimed that they were in Intel for “a decade depending on how it performs.” Let’s hope the naysayers didn’t sway them before the significant turnaround in fortunes at Intel.
But why is INTC so clearly rampant right now? Over recent months, we have seen the huge Intel juggernaut turn around, driven by Lip Bu Tan’s deal-making. Today, we are reporting on the firm’s stock rocketing by 28% after a strong Q1 with rising forecasts. This rise is like a mirror to August 2024’s collapse.
It is also clear that the new CEO is making deals with the right people to grab firmly onto the coattails of AI tech expansionist enthusiasm. Notably, earlier this month, Intel made what is probably a future-defining agreement to join Elon Musk’s TeraFab project.
The best way to celebrate
We imagine that one day, in the not-too-distant future, the fortune-flipped investor will laugh, satisfied by their incredible wealth and canny investment acumen, while enjoying a big cigar in the TeraFab burger bar, at least if Elon Musk has his way.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
TechieTwo Despite Intel's documented criminal history they have been a darling on Wall Street even when they were trying to go out of business from internal chaos and incompetence. So betting on Intel is a safe bet as they control the largest CPU segment. Until they control less than 50% of the market, they can do no wrong according to wheelers and dealers on Wall Street.Reply -
pjmelect Investing in shares is just gambling like putting money on the horses or in the casino. You may win but it is not due to any skill on your part although gamblers will disagree.Reply -
toffty Reply
This is a close metaphor only if you invest in a single stock. Diversification is key as well as a mix of stock and bonds that are both nation and worldwide. If properly diversified, the better analogy is that the national and/or global economy at the macro-scale will be better off in the future.pjmelect said:Investing in shares is just gambling like putting money on the horses or in the casino. You may win but it is not due to any skill on your part although gamblers will disagree. -
PEnns Replytoffty said:This is a close metaphor only if you invest in a single stock. Diversification is key as well as a mix of stock and bonds that are both nation and worldwide. If properly diversified, the better analogy is that the national and/or global economy at the macro-scale will be better off in the future.
Absolutely true.
Except, in this case, the guy dumped his whole inheritance into Intel stock! He could have easily lost his shirt (and underpants) but he got lucky. -
TerryLaze Reply
He put 700.000 of 800.000 into the stock, having a bottom line positive of 100.000 is not "lost his shirt" .PEnns said:Absolutely true.
Except, in this case, the guy dumped his whole inheritance into Intel stock! He could have easily lost his shirt (and underpants) but he got lucky.
Also there was never any risk of losing that money, the only question was how long he would have to wait to get a profit, that could have easily been a long time. -
Thunder64 ReplyTerryLaze said:He put 700.000 of 800.000 into the stock, having a bottom line positive of 100.000 is not "lost his shirt" .
Also there was never any risk of losing that money, the only question was how long he would have to wait to get a profit, that could have easily been a long time.
Never at risk of losing that money? You will say anything to defend Intel. -
Thunder64 ReplyTerryLaze said:He put 700.000 of 800.000 into the stock, having a bottom line positive of 100.000 is not "lost his shirt" .
Also there was never any risk of losing that money, the only question was how long he would have to wait to get a profit, that could have easily been a long time.
Putting all of your eggs in one basket in the market is stupid. Whoever it was got lucky and should cash out now. -
TerryLaze Reply
Yeah, even if intel would have crashed, it would have taken them years to come back but there was never any chance of them not coming back ever.Thunder64 said:Never at risk of losing that money? You will say anything to defend Intel.
We have seen from AMD how you can lose all your fab and still come back after many years. -
Thunder64 ReplyTerryLaze said:Yeah, even if intel would have crashed, it would have taken them years to come back but there was never any chance of them not coming back ever.
We have seen from AMD how you can lose all your fab and still come back after many years.
Despite anti-competitive practices by Intel like rebates. Intel got the US gov't to invest in them so they were deemed "To big to fail". -
TerryLaze Reply
Is this supposed to be an argument IN FAVOR of this guy loosing all his money?!?!Thunder64 said:Despite anti-competitive practices by Intel like rebates. Intel got the US gov't to invest in them so they were deemed "To big to fail".