YouTube Won't be Affected by Google's Fight Against Piracy

Google on Friday revealed a new system for fighting piracy on the web. Amit Singhal, Google's SVP of Engineering, said that starting this week, the company would implement an update in the search algorithms that will place sites related to piracy lower on the list. The demotion will be based on the number of valid copyright removal notices (DMCA) Google receives for any given website, and aims to help Web surfers find legitimate, quality sources of content more easily, pushing Spotify, Hulu and others to the top. However, it seems Google's own video site, YouTube, has no risk of falling in the rankings.

Search Engine Land reports that since Google's system for filing copyright removal notices is different, Youtube (which no doubt receives numerous take-down notices each day) won't be affected by the new policy. The issue lies with the fact that YouTube has its own Copyright Center complete with a Copyright Infringement Notification button for copyright owners. There's also a Content Verification Program and Content ID button for submitting multiple copyright notifications and verifying content. Filing a copyright infringement claim in this way lets Google know about the infringement without actually sending a DMCA notice.

SEL's Danny Sullivan writes that if copyright owners do decide to go the takedown route and get a video removed, the YouTube page hosting the video itself remains up and also remains potentially listed in Google. If the search giant had a common DMCA takedown system, YouTube would be affected by the new demoting system. However, because it has its own tools for having videos removed, it won't ever find itself on Google's list of publishers with the most takedown notices.

Follow @JaneMcEntegart on Twitter.                                       

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

  • digiex
    I typed Nero serial at the search window and walah!
    Reply
  • Anyone else want to know what the hell a walah is?
    Reply
  • neblix
    I think he means voila.
    Reply
  • boiler1990
    To be honest, I don't care one bit about YouTube results. Google shouldn't be inserting itself in the issue of copyright infringement in any manner whatsoever. As a search provider, they should be giving me unadulterated results for the terms I entered in the search bar, not what Google or others *think* I should be seeing.

    The DMCA takedown filings really are just accusations against theft - they do not need to be substantiated with large amounts of evidence (and can sometimes work against the owners, as demonstrated in the Jay Leno + NBC debacle). In this case, specific sites could very easily be targeted with DMCA notices, and Google will downrank the site in search results simply because the site has a large number of filed notices, regardless of their validity.

    Rarely are measures like this implemented for the benefit of all. Google was originally a large backer of the net neutrality agreements, and this is a very visible step backward on their position.
    Reply
  • freggo
    Every company has to 'filter' it's range of products or services.

    Like a Computer retailer may carry HP, Compaq and Acer, but not Apple for instance.
    As a consumer you do not have the right to demand they carry EVERYTHING so YOU can decide what you like.

    Your Evening news and Sports casters do the same. They Show Baseball and Football results, but no soccer. They show the murder of a white woman (10 minute in detail, but the killing of the black guy gets only 1 minute air time.


    In the same way Google provides a Service; Search Results. And as the creator and provider of this service they have the right to decide what they present and how they go about it.

    Reply
  • juanc
    boiler1990To be honest, I don't care one bit about YouTube results. Google shouldn't be inserting itself in the issue of copyright infringement in any manner whatsoever. As a search provider, they should be giving me unadulterated results for the terms I entered in the search bar, not what Google or others *think* I should be seeing.
    As the internet is free... and google is a private but free service (or ad-based), they can do whatever they want.

    And you are free, to choose a different search engine that provides you with the results you want.
    Reply
  • juanc
    Can't edit my own messages? would like to add, to be clear that as a private company, it might have "perceived funding" for this to happen.
    Reply
  • rantoc
    juancAs the internet is free... and google is a private but free service (or ad-based), they can do whatever they want WITHIN THE LAW.And you are free, to choose a different search engine that provides you with the results you want.
    There fixed it for you... even a corp automaton is expected to least know the laws is above the corporations and that the corps aren't allowed to do whatever they like.
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    Um...YouTube is where all the piracy is at.
    Reply
  • teh_chem
    So what...It's google's service--they can do with as they please. Don't like it? Don't use google.

    Besides, at least google/youtube take an active role in removing flagged items for copyright-infringement. It's not as if youtube is a "piracy" service site, such as TPB and similar pages. People can post copyright-infringing things to YT, but the explicit reason for YT's existence isn't to facilitate the distribution of copyright-infringing material as an alternative to buying it on a mass scale.

    The "spirit" of the site matters just as much as what content it has. And don't give me this BS about how TPB/torrentfreak/etc. host "legit" content--we all know the spirit of those sites isn't to support the mass-distribution of legit materials.

    tl;dr, it's google's service, they can do with it what they wish, and you don't need to use it if you don't like it.
    Reply