Skip to main content

Backups To Disk: Four Tape Alternatives Put To The Test

Test System

Hardware
ProcessorIntel Pentium 4, 2.0 GHz256 kB L2 Cache (Willamette)
MotherboardIntel 845EBTIntel 845E ChipsetBIOS BT84520A.86A.0024.P10
Memory256 MB DDR/PC2100, CL2.0Micron/Crucial
Controlleri845E UltraDMA/100-Controller (ICH4)On-Board USB 2.0 (ICH4)On-Board FireWire
Graphics cardATI Radeon SDRAM, 32 MB
Network3COM 905TX PCI 100 MBit
OSWindows XP Professional 5.10.2600Service Pack 1
Drivers & Settings
Graphics driver5.1.2001.0 (Windows XP Standard)
DIE driverIntel INF Drivers 5.02.1003
DirectX version9.0c
Resolution1024x768, 16 Bit, 85 Hz refresh

To get a picture of the performance of these storage products, we resorted to a copy tool instead a relying on a classic backup program. As a rule, backup programs are used with data compression. This does not always make sense when using hard drives, as one of their benefits should after all be direct access to the saved data. Running compression algorithms also places a high load on the system, so the storage device interface is no longer the bottleneck.

Test Results