Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Crytek May Be Looking to Expand Crysis Into Other Genres

By - Source: DustyCartridge | B 37 comments

There's still life left in the Crysis franchise after the release of the final game in the trilogy.

In a recent interview with DustyCartridge, Crytek producer Michael Elliot Read indicated that the launch of Crysis 3 won't be the end of the franchise despite the original trilogy-based design.

As Microsoft has demonstrated with Halo 4, a great FPS franchise doesn't necessarily have to end with the close of episode three despite the trilogy-based story arc. It may be that Crysis will head in the same direction, as towards the end of the Q&A, Read told the site that the universe Crytek created still has a lot of life left in it.

"Whether it’s in a different game type format, whether it’s expanding upon this, it’s hard to say," Read said. "That’s going to be up to the designers at the end of the day. But I think we’ve built… Crysis was always intended to be a trilogy and I think that over that time we’ve built a really cool universe."

"We haven’t really gone in and said 'Hey let’s put Nano suits and clown suits and stuff and completely violate and sell our IP,'" he added. "We’ve done a fairly good job at maintaining that, so I think in terms of the universe, we have a lot more life left in that to go back and try some unique stuff. Whether it’s FPS or not I have no idea, but there’s definitely a future in the franchise."

Earlier in the interview, Read said that Crytek still wants to "melt" PCs, referring to the ongoing joke that CryEngine is way ahead of current hardware, thus the highest settings could make the latest setup slow to a crawl when rendering each detailed frame. He said that when the original Crysis alpha was leaked and the tech sites got their hands on it, they were dazzled over how hard CryEngine pushed hardware. It was a game that no PC could run, he said, hence the "can it run Crysis" joke when referring to system configurations.

"So we’re able to do everything in tandem this time and not just focus on 'Yeah, let’s make a hyper pretty game,'" he said. "The teams we have put together handle so many different aspects of the game and it doesn’t always boil down to 'we can’t put that in because it’s not graphically feasible.' There are a number of things that play into it. But I think for the overall gameplay style – we wanted to maintain what we did in Crysis and Crysis 2. Find that middle ground between the two of them, but come back and do all these little things that will just make the overall experience that much better."

The interview goes on to cover topics like the battle of innovation verses iteration, and striking the perfect middle ground during development regarding the urban grid in Crysis 2 and the open plains in the original game. They also talk about the inspiration behind the Hunter mode, and the current state of the FPS landscape.

"It’s interesting where it’s going," he said regarding the landscape topic. "Because you’re starting to see, especially on the console market, you have games like Battlefield which are starting to introduce players to these larger maps and groups of people that PC people have had for ten years or more. I think it’s very cool to see that evolve."

To read the full interview, head here.

 

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

Discuss
Display all 37 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 23 Hide
    sixdegree , January 7, 2013 10:28 PM
    How about a game about shooting dinosaurs? They could use the Crytek engine and their expertise in FPS games to and call it: Dino Crysis.
  • 21 Hide
    Anonymous , January 7, 2013 10:16 PM
    Looking forward to maxing out my PC with Crysis 3 (GTX 680 4GB, 16gb ram, 512GB SSD, 2560 x 1600 display) So glad they decided to develop it for PC first then dumb it down to consoles for a change.
  • 17 Hide
    rocknrollz , January 7, 2013 10:15 PM
    Milking what, the cry engine? The Crysis series is over after 3. How much sense would it make to stop using their engine after spending millons on it. The point of this article was to point out how Crytek is trying to find new ways to use their engine.
Other Comments
  • 17 Hide
    rocknrollz , January 7, 2013 10:15 PM
    Milking what, the cry engine? The Crysis series is over after 3. How much sense would it make to stop using their engine after spending millons on it. The point of this article was to point out how Crytek is trying to find new ways to use their engine.
  • 21 Hide
    Anonymous , January 7, 2013 10:16 PM
    Looking forward to maxing out my PC with Crysis 3 (GTX 680 4GB, 16gb ram, 512GB SSD, 2560 x 1600 display) So glad they decided to develop it for PC first then dumb it down to consoles for a change.
  • 23 Hide
    sixdegree , January 7, 2013 10:28 PM
    How about a game about shooting dinosaurs? They could use the Crytek engine and their expertise in FPS games to and call it: Dino Crysis.
  • 0 Hide
    bustapr , January 7, 2013 10:36 PM
    I can definitely see more games set in the crysis universe. Its not milking a dead cow as long as they bring something new and exciting. Think of a Crysis RTS! :) 
  • 3 Hide
    bustapr , January 7, 2013 10:40 PM
    also, the article didnt mention anything about just expanding on the cryengine. though its a given that they want to use cryengine 3 as much as they can, this article is about the future of the franchise after the trilogy. Like how mass effect is continuing.
  • 1 Hide
    crossfiresli160 , January 7, 2013 10:41 PM
    just work on timesplitters 4
  • 9 Hide
    atikkur , January 7, 2013 11:09 PM
    i want an Epic Single Player Simulation Mech Game with this engine.
  • 0 Hide
    Azn Cracker , January 7, 2013 11:35 PM
    Make a racing game.
  • 12 Hide
    aggroboy , January 7, 2013 11:42 PM
    How about a Crysis Dating game.
  • 8 Hide
    joytech22 , January 7, 2013 11:49 PM
    sixdegreeHow about a game about shooting dinosaurs? They could use the Crytek engine and their expertise in FPS games to and call it: Dino Crysis.


    Or.. They could create a decent Jurassic Park game for once and use this engine.
    Seriously, Jurassic Park is a hard movie to replicate in a game because the visuals need to complement the gameplay (which also has to be good and believable).
  • 4 Hide
    Anonymous , January 8, 2013 12:07 AM
    Plz make some H-Game with the engine.
    Use the nice sking rendering... use the dynamic...Don't waste it.
    I am sure those games will sell much better than Crysis.
  • 3 Hide
    Vatharian , January 8, 2013 12:19 AM
    It is over? Is it a joke? Crisis 1 was cool, non-linear game that continues to be fun nearly 6 years after release (and still is taxing for hardware, btw). I want to know, what the hell happened to Nomad, what was going on with Prophet after he was abducted and what the hell was between attack on Langshan islands and... New York? Crysis 2 was big WTF for me and many other people. Crytek, get yourself together!
  • 6 Hide
    CaedenV , January 8, 2013 12:21 AM
    Surely one of these would stick...
    Crysis, the jRPG
    Crysis, the overhead RTS that requires duel GTX690s to play
    Crysis, pong reinvisioned!
  • 3 Hide
    bnot , January 8, 2013 12:37 AM
    Half life ep3 ;) 
  • 0 Hide
    alidan , January 8, 2013 12:49 AM
    crossfiresli160just work on timesplitters 4


    i believe they wont do that because of the preformance that the last game got... lest thats what i heard.

    bustapralso, the article didnt mention anything about just expanding on the cryengine. though its a given that they want to use cryengine 3 as much as they can, this article is about the future of the franchise after the trilogy. Like how mass effect is continuing.


    crysis, the tactical fps.
    crysis, the tactical overhead game
    crysis, the tactical rpg

    so many good games genres to break into without straying to far from fps roots.
  • -3 Hide
    Anonymous , January 8, 2013 2:01 AM
    I`need download the demo of this game, somebady help me?.
    Tom`s hardware help me please?
  • 0 Hide
    Shin-san , January 8, 2013 2:27 AM
    Of course they should keep making games with the Cryengine. This is exactly why Epic has such a usable engine. They build the Unreal Engine around their video games, and tailor it to them. Not only you have a proven engine that was actually used to make a video game, but you also discover your engine's bugs and weaknesses, and fix them. Otherwise, you have a lot of code that's probably not that useful for anything, or is incredibly inefficient. "We have a game engine that was never used in a video game!" won't fly.

    There's a saying to aspiring game programmers: make games, not engines. However, you can build a basic engine to create a game.
  • 0 Hide
    chimera201 , January 8, 2013 4:25 AM
    Quote:
    Read said that Crytek still wants to "melt" PCs

    I hope that doesn't mean that playing the console version at 32xAA, 32xAF ,>=1080p will melt ur PC.
    I want the actual game content to melt my PC.
  • 0 Hide
    chimera201 , January 8, 2013 4:28 AM
    VatharianIt is over? Is it a joke? Crisis 1 was cool, non-linear game that continues to be fun nearly 6 years after release (and still is taxing for hardware, btw). I want to know, what the hell happened to Nomad, what was going on with Prophet after he was abducted and what the hell was between attack on Langshan islands and... New York? Crysis 2 was big WTF for me and many other people. Crytek, get yourself together!

    ^this
Display more comments