Ads
Ads
All about Storage Solutions
 Latest Storage Solutions articles
Perfect Consumer Backup With Seagate And Rebit

Perfect Consumer Backup With Seagate And Rebit
Seagate’s Replica is a portable hard drive with automatic backup, versioning, and disaster recovery features to make backup a no-brainer. The product works so well that it deserves our rare Best of Tom’s Award. Read More

  • Thecus N8800 NAS/SAN: Quick-Look
    After recently running out of room on my Thecus N5200, I again turned to the company for something larger. What I found won't work for most folks (unless you have a rack in your garage, that is). But it's reasonably-priced and plenty fast for most SMBs. Read More
All Storage Solutions articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
Ads

Sponsored links

Report: Intel Delaying Support for USB 3.0

Next news
8:20 PM - October 26, 2009 by Kevin Parrish

Intel is pushing back support for USB 3.0 until 2011 claims a report.

Last week EE Times reported that Intel Corp. has decided to delay its support for USB 3.0 until 2011. According to a "top tier" PC manufacturer who chose to remain nameless, Intel's hesitation will put mainstream adoption of the new USB standard on hold for at least a year. Intel originally planned to sample chipsets supporting USB 3.0 in early 2010, but now those plans have changed; Intel's PC technology manager even confirmed the report.

EE Times thus contacted a spokesperson from Intel and asked about the delay. The contact said the he didn't know anything about the supposed delay, and declined to comment any further on the subject. Currently Intel is focused on supporting the company's first processor architecture to use an integrated memory controller, Nehalem, and is also working on transitioning to the 5 GHz PCI Express 2.0 spec.

Still, that won't stop some companies from jumping onto the SuperSpeed USB bandwagon, releasing high-end consumer systems and graphic workstations... but not without a high cost. "It's hard to commit to an emerging technology like this when the key silicon enablers (meaning Intel) are not making it a priority," the source said. "You get into a chicken-and-egg situation."

EE Time's source also added that Intel needs to consider the "compelling needs" for USB 3.0 now versus 18 months later.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
ubernoobie 10/27/2009 2:39 AM
Hide
-6+

aww... I have to stick for amd for usb 3.0 then :(

jimmysmitty 10/27/2009 2:42 AM
Show
ominous prime 10/27/2009 2:43 AM
Hide
-14+

Glad I didn't wait for USB 3.0 before I upgraded to a new computer now. I'm surprised USB 3.0 isn't more of a priority to Intel.

Upendra09 10/27/2009 2:43 AM
Hide
-12+

"top tier" who want to remain unnamed

sure ok

claudeb 10/27/2009 2:44 AM
Hide
-5+

eSATA. I dont need a mouse and keyboard running off of usb 3.0.

dheadley 10/27/2009 2:48 AM
Show
EnFoRceR22 10/27/2009 3:09 AM
Hide
-3+

dheadley :
I don't see why they are even saying that they will support it in 2011. There is nothing saying they have to support it at all. They can just end their USB support at 2.0 and move on to their new fiber technology. So what if people get left at the USB 2.0 level? They don't lose anything they have invested in peripherals. It's not like they haven't dropped other technologies before and left people out of luck in future motherboards. AGP slots, chip sockets, memory slots, etc.. Heck PCI slots, Parallel and serial ports, PS2 connections will all disappear soon.




Your comprasin is actualy way off here.. each one of those things LIKE USB 3 was a universal standard "upgrade" they got rid of pci for agp for video then agp for pci e. memory advanced all these advancements and changing to them is different then deciding to not adopt them. Besides having a single universal port is much nicer then 20 different ones. i cant say i have personaly used any of those slots in the past few years. maybe pci more recently but yeah.

Honis 10/27/2009 3:31 AM
Hide
-1+

I was planning on buying the expansion slot version for my main PC. This does put a kink in my plans to hold off my purchase of a laptop until USB 3.0 is released. I use my laptops for 3-4 year time periods and I'm hitting year 3.5.

wintermint 10/27/2009 4:22 AM
Hide
-0+

Grrr bad move Intel but a delay could be a blessing in disguise :o

dheadley 10/27/2009 4:39 AM
Hide
-4+

EnFoRceR22 :
Your comprasin is actualy way off here.. each one of those things LIKE USB 3 was a universal standard "upgrade" they got rid of pci for agp for video then agp for pci e. memory advanced all these advancements and changing to them is different then deciding to not adopt them. Besides having a single universal port is much nicer then 20 different ones. i cant say i have personaly used any of those slots in the past few years. maybe pci more recently but yeah.



How would Intel adopting Light Peak as their next advancement for connections be any different than the move from PCI to AGP to PCI Express? USB 3.0 is not established in the market as a universal standard yet. In developing USB 3.0 they came up with the idea for Light Peak and they themselves seem to think it is a better technology. So why would they have any need of going forward with USB 3.0 at this point? If they have both technologies at the same stage development, why not choose one and make that your next step? They are the biggest maker of motherboard chipsets in the world, if they say Light Peak is it, peripheral makers are not going to go with AMD or VIA to get USB 3. They will start making Light Peak hard drives, peripherals and USB to Light Peak hubs etc..

If there is a better technology developed before the next iteration of a series is released that new version may never catch on in any great degree. just look at Firewire 800 and will there ever be a Firewire 1600 and 3200 as planned, or the fiber based 6.4 version talked about. Nothing says USB has to continue on at all.

mman74 10/27/2009 5:53 AM
Hide
-1+

That's it then. I am waiting no longer. I am going out to get an i7 with Win 7 now. As far as I am concerned they can postpone it to 2012, because I am not getting another machine for another few years at least!

yjagota 10/27/2009 6:33 AM
Hide
-0+

[citation]and is also working on transitioning to the 5 GHz PCI Express 2.0 spec[citation]
2.0 or 3.0?

As far as the delay is concerned, Good things take some time in coming.

liquidsnake718 10/27/2009 6:33 AM
Hide
--2+

Noooooooooooooooo0000000000oooOOOOOOOOOOOoo......

I was waiting for the first USB3.0 motherboards to come out next year and then I was going to finally upgrade from my 775!!! This would have been a TRUE 'next gen' motherboard with a 1366pin and SLI/Xfire! Man I am really upset. I hope MSI, ASUS, EVGA, XFX, FOXCONN, and Gigabyte make USB3.0 MBs and come out with them if Intel doesnt want to join the bandwagon then it doesnt matter, I just hope there wont be a dominoe affect with all the other MB and chip makers!

Intel must have a good reason not to however and I guess they are working on their hexacore chips and will make LGA1366 even better, so maybe its worth waiting for LGA1366 2.0 with USB3.0?????????

cyberkuberiah 10/27/2009 6:34 AM
Hide
-3+

amd time !!!

thomaseron 10/27/2009 6:38 AM
Hide
-6+

I bet they are having their revenge, because of the hefty fine from the EU. :-P "yay! Let's postpone the USB 3. That'll show them! oh, wait, will we lose customers now? Who cares, we can still bribe companies to not use parts from our competitors."

doomtomb 10/27/2009 6:43 AM
Hide
-5+

intel = dicks

give us both USB 3.0 AND lightspeed

doomtomb 10/27/2009 6:43 AM
Hide
-4+

lightspeed = *light peak

Anonymous 10/27/2009 6:53 AM
Hide
-1+

Light peak isn't a replacement for USB 3.0. To quote Intel's own page on the subject...

"Light Peak also has the ability to run multiple protocols simultaneously over a single cable, enabling the technology to connect devices such as peripherals, workstations, displays, disk drives, docking stations, and more."

Light Peak would simply be an alternate cabling, which allows for higher and less error-prone transfer rates, for existing interface technologies.

Thus one could very well say that USB 3.0, with it's high transfer speeds, and Light Peak would be an excellent match. It wouldn't seem unreasonable, to me at least, that Intel is holding back USB 3.0 to have Light Peak ready for a simultaneous deployment rather than developing the latter as a "replacement".

Just my 2c based on what little we know so far though.

thejerk 10/27/2009 7:30 AM
Hide
-1+

dumb.

matt87_50 10/27/2009 7:38 AM
Hide
-2+

doomtomb :
lightspeed = *light peak




though feel free to give us light speed as well if you want... if its on the menu...

Anonymous 10/27/2009 8:40 AM
Hide
--1+

I suspect this is a deeper issue. I bet they could have implemented themselves into a corner as once AMD did. They went from socket 939 to 940 because they "forgot/overlooked" a power pin that was required to power the higher end 120+ watt processors. This maybe the problem with Intel and the P55 chipsets/processors and their successors. They now put the PCI Express controller on the chip and probably do not have the bandwith to support USB 3.0 via the southbridge link or processor PCI Express links.

Do the math:
1 USB 3.0 port has a bandwith of about 5000 Megabits = ~500 Megabytes per second with 8/10 encoding.
1 PCI Express 2.0 lane has the bandwidth of 500 Megabytes per second
So 1 USB 3.0 port = 1 PCI Express 2.0 lane
So 8 USB 3.0 ports would require 8 additional PCI Express 2.0 lanes

I bet they forgot the additional data pins in their new sockets and do not want to force an upgrade too quickly to a new socket like AMD was forced to do. Really pisses of the users and OEMs, so rather than admit the mistake just delay it, not admit a mistake, and then introduce it with the next socket in 2011.

apache_lives 10/27/2009 11:43 AM
Hide
-1+

wtp33 :
I suspect this is a deeper issue. I bet they could have implemented themselves into a corner as once AMD did. They went from socket 939 to 940 because they "forgot/overlooked" a power pin that was required to power the higher end 120+ watt processors. This maybe the problem with Intel and the P55 chipsets/processors and their successors. They now put the PCI Express controller on the chip and probably do not have the bandwith to support USB 3.0 via the southbridge link or processor PCI Express links.Do the math:1 USB 3.0 port has a bandwith of about 5000 Megabits = ~500 Megabytes per second with 8/10 encoding.1 PCI Express 2.0 lane has the bandwidth of 500 Megabytes per secondSo 1 USB 3.0 port = 1 PCI Express 2.0 laneSo 8 USB 3.0 ports would require 8 additional PCI Express 2.0 lanes I bet they forgot the additional data pins in their new sockets and do not want to force an upgrade too quickly to a new socket like AMD was forced to do. Really pisses of the users and OEMs, so rather than admit the mistake just delay it, not admit a mistake, and then introduce it with the next socket in 2011.



Ummm no.

Southbridge looks after any USB ports, all data doesnt have to travel to the CPU (dedicated bus anyhow), and USB's arnt via the PCIe bus.

apache_lives 10/27/2009 11:45 AM
Hide
-1+

Oh and AMD didnt have that sort of issue with 940 to 939 - they changed the IMC to support standard, non ECC memory and because the two were totally different designs they changed the socket to distinguish the two.

MamiyaOtaru 10/27/2009 11:54 AM
Hide
-0+

dheadley :
PS2 connections will all disappear soon.


I sure hope not. N-key rollover is not possible over USB. USB remains an inferior connection for keyboards. The number of people with n-key rollover capable keyboards is vanishingly small, but I'm one of them and so a mobo without PS2 is unacceptable.

anamaniac 10/27/2009 12:13 PM
Hide
-0+

wintermint :
Grrr bad move Intel but a delay could be a blessing in disguise


Maybe...

Though USB connectors on everything would be sweet...
1080p/60hz/8 Bits video requires 4.5Gb/s, USB 3.0 is 4.8Gb/s... get my point here? (Though this is ignoring a audio stream.)
I also want a universal port for my net, hell, even my HDDs...

Just make USB integrated into the PCIe, make it a fiber optic cable, and give it 10-20Gb/s, and I'll cream myself in a public place...

Bunz_of_Steel 10/27/2009 1:31 PM
Hide
--1+

Intel... you suk! always have but not talkin bout your products, just your stupid corporate money hogs practices. Intel stands to make more money by investing in.. then that's what they will do. No surprise really. Buutttt then queue AMD.... Your turn please and rest assured retail will follow!!

TSM

psycho sykes 10/27/2009 1:36 PM
Hide
-0+

This is really bad!
I don't trust any other chip maker for a chip going into my (long-term) motherboard... And Intel made itself out by doing this (chip makers=0)
Is there any word about Intel's support for SATA6G?
And can you please explain this

Quote :...and is also working on transitioning to the 5 GHz PCI Express 2.0 spec.
?

sparky13 10/27/2009 1:46 PM
Hide
-2+

Bunz_of_Steel :
Intel... you suk! always have but not talkin bout your products, just your stupid corporate money hogs practices. Intel stands to make more money by investing in.. then that's what they will do. No surprise really. Buutttt then queue AMD.... Your turn please and rest assured retail will follow!!TSM


What?

kelfen 10/27/2009 1:52 PM
Hide
-0+

"Currently Intel is focused on supporting the company's first processor architecture to use an integrated memory controller"

Does this mean there putting an intergraded SDD on the motherboards making them uber fast ?

Bunz_of_Steel 10/27/2009 2:00 PM
Hide
-0+

early morning guess I should have more coffee. What I was TRYING to say was Intel is going to put their priority where they stand to make the most money with consumer's a second thought. If AMD was to step up to the plate the retail market - buyers would sell it and we the consumers would buy it! I know I could definitely use an increased bandwidth moving files around. Hope not to confusing if I'm still confusing then, I'm just ranting trying to wake up still, thx :)

tester24 10/27/2009 2:05 PM
Hide
--1+

jimmysmitty :
Well thats too bad if true.I mean we don't really need the speed (6.8Gbps) but it would be nice. As long as it doesn't get rushed and cause problems when it comes out.



The spec has been finalized so you don't have to worry about the rush. This is Intel spreading themselves too thin. Personally I do say there is a major need for USB3 I'm sick and tired of crappy transfer rates of external harddrives on USB2. eSATA is no substitute.

kelfen :
"Currently Intel is focused on supporting the company's first processor architecture to use an integrated memory controller" Does this mean there putting an intergraded SDD on the motherboards making them uber fast ?



No it means instead of putting the memory controller (which controls the RAM) on the north bridge it is directly controlled by the CPU, this almost eliminates the latency that was had previously. This technology isn't new it's been around for years pioneered by AMD.

SATA 6 gig wont by around til mid to late next year at best. Before I left the storage industry they were just working on 6 gig SAS controllers. It takes a while to go from business/corporate use to comercial use. But as TH has showed us, the performance benefits of a 6 gig drive isn't that great.


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • USB 3.0 will, of course, also require new USB hubs to allow connecting several devices through one physical connection. USB 3.0 hubs will be more sophisticated than USB 2.0 devices, as they will include two separate hubs in one single device: one SuperSpeed hub for USB 3.0 operation, and a second one for USB 2.0. This will be entirely transparent to the user, as all ports will be connected to both hubs. However, this approach does not increase the maximum amount of devices per USB host port, which remains 127. Will USB 3.0 Hubs Be More Expensive? The implementation of such a double-feature hub will most likely have a negative impact on first-generation USB 3.0 hubs, although we expect future product generations to be based on unified silicon, meaning that one controller supports both hub functions. We also want to point at compatibility issues with USB 1.1, as USB 3.0 devices are not supposed to maintain compatibility with the old 12 Mbit/s standard. Hence, USB 3.0 hubs will not cooperate with old USB 1.1 controllers. Market Penetration by 2010 The specification is set now, but it will take a few more months until devices are available in any significant quantities. The USB 3.0 Promoter Group expects USB 3.0 consumer products to be available by 2010, which is a year later than expected. Most companies will be busy implementing USB 3.0 for the rest of this year, but we expect controllers to be ready before 2009 closes out. Windows 7 Without USB 3.0 Support? Microsoft has already announced that it won't be supporting USB 3.0 natively when Windows 7 ships. The time between finalization of the USB 3.0 specification and the completion of Windows 7 appears to be too short to fit support into the Windows 7 production pipeline. However, Microsoft will definitely add USB 3.0 support via updates. It remains to be seen whether or not Windows XP or Windows Vista will be upgraded with USB 3.0 support, allowing current users to benefit from SuperSpeed technology. The delays also impacted the product development of other manufacturers, such as Intel. First, rumors said that the Ibex Peak chipset (P55) would be supporting USB 3.0, which is definitely not the case. Users will have to wait for Intel’s 2010 platform to get integrated USB 3.0 hardware support.

  • Toshiba and SSDs Competing in a market that’s been targeted by the world’s largest semiconductor company is no easy task. Given Intel’s push into the SSD (solid state storage) market, Toshiba has tried to differentiate itself from Intel’s more commodity-like approach. For example, Toshiba offers a half-terabyte SSD, while Intel’s current largest SSD is 160GB. Now Toshiba is pushing into alternative form factors, such as a mSATA (mini-SATA) configuration in 30GB and 62GB sizes, suitable for netbooks or server boot drives. These drives plug directly into a mini-PCI interface and are substantially smaller (up to 1/7th the size of a 2.5-inch form factor). Toshiba will also be offering similar configurations in a “half-slim” form factor, smaller than a business card, with no actual case, that plugs directly into a SATA port. USB 3.0 Update We mentioned USB 3.0 (also known as “SuperSpeed USB”) in our day two IDF update. We’re updating that brief mention today with an update after a technical session on USB 3.0’s steady march towards actual products. Up to 10x performance increase--480 Mb/s to 5 Gb/sFast Sync-N-Go to minimize user wait timeOptimize power efficiency--uses 1/3 the power of USB 2.0; no device polling and lower active and idle power requirementsBackward compatible with USB 2.0. NEC announced the first SuperSpeed USB host controller, the uDP 720200. Asus had a PCI Express interface card based on the NEC chip, running in several PCs, connected to various peripherals. Asus is also showing its previously-announced P6X58 Premium motherboard with the NEC controller built directly onto the motherboard. The system was connected to a solid state drive streaming data off at 250MB/sec, around eight times faster than similar USB 2.0 products. Fujitsu demoed a laptop PC with the NEC host controller, too. Given Intel’s public roadmaps, it may be a good year before we see SuperSpeed USB embedded into PC core logic. Then there’s the issue of software support. At the USB 3.0 technical session, senior program manager Lars Guisti of Microsoft gave an update on how SuperSpeed USB’s XHCI driver stack might be implemented into Windows. It’s a fairly complex driver stack, given support for backward compatibility, the new power management features, and higher data speeds. Microsoft will be delivering native support for XHCI in some future Windows update, but the timing is uncertain.

  • More Bandwidth with USB 3.0

    It took quite a while for USB 2.0, the second-generation Universal Serial Bus specification, to become as popular as it is today. Intel had launched USB back in 1996 as a replacement for serial RS-232 and parallel 25-pin connects. And although the benefits typically speak for themselves, it required broad support at a platform level to be considered successful. Even though Intel implemented USB support in its 440FX chipset for the Pentium Pro and Pentium II, it wasn't destined for broad adoption, due to missing software support in Microsoft's Windows 95 and Windows NT 4.0 operating systems. Moreover, there were only few USB devices available back then, making the launch even more difficult. USB 1.0, at its 12 Mbit/s data rate, clearly started as a niche interface. Useless or Universal? Many users scoffed at the Universal Serial Bus when Intel updated the specification in 1998. Version 1.1 introduced interrupt transfers, which are important for HID devices (Human Interface Device, such as keyboards and mice). However, USB 1.1 did not enable faster transfer speeds, meaning that the throughput remained 1.5 Mbit/s at low-speed link mode and 12 Mbit/s at full speed. The Need for Speed: USB 2.0 Two more years later, in 2000, the USB specification received another update. This time it was USB 2.0, which brought a significant increase in bandwidth, as it offered 40x more bandwidth and peak gross throughput of 480 MB/s in high speed more. Fortunately, USB 2.0 was still compatible with USB 1.1, which was important to support first generation USB thumb drives, which initially were all based on the 12 Mbit/s USB 1.1. standard. True USB 2.0 devices hit the mainstream in 2002, which finally saw the interface come into its own. The bandwidth of 480 Mbit/s wasn’t only fast enough for thumb drives, but also for external storage devices, MP3 players, smart phones, and digital cameras, which require moving lots of data. Since its breakthrough, USB 2.0 has effectively replaced serial and parallel interfaces--a fact that is most noticable when you look at a sample of the latest motherboards. Only few products still come with parallel or serial interfaces, as these are no longer necessary for consumers products, and retain only a small presence in server environments and industrial computing. The success story of USB will continue soon, as USB 3.0 is prepared for mainstream consumption.