Microsoft Doubles Storage Capacity For Netbooks

Netbooks manufactured with Windows XP have had its 80 GB HDD restriction dropped by Microsoft in favor of a 160 GB limit.

Microsoft is becoming a bit more lenient with the limits it has imposed on netbooks manufactures who wish to use Windows XP as the OS. As of Wednesday, Microsoft officially doubled the maximum allowable hard disk drive size to 160 GB, up from 80GB. MSI and Asustek already have taken action to update their Windows XP netbook offerings to feature 160 GB HDDs, which should affect the MSI Wind U100 and Asus Eee PC 1000H netbooks.

Due to the demand for Microsoft Windows XP in netbooks, Microsoft has a large amount of control over the allowed specifications of netbooks. With Microsoft wishing to push its Windows Vista operating system, it has been attempting to cut life support to Windows XP. Since netbook computers are arguably too underpowered for Windows Vista, it seems netbook manufactures have pressured Microsoft into continuing to provide Windows XP as a low-cost speedy alternative. As a compromise it seems, Microsoft has set guidelines for what are acceptable system specifications for Windows XP, limits that netbook manufactures follow faithfully. Although Linux is a viable alternative to Windows XP and it is used in some netbooks without system specification restrictions, many consumers still prefer a Windows operating system.

Some of the restrictions Microsoft have supposedly placed on netbooks include a 1 GB of RAM limit, a specific list of allowable slow CPUs, limited screen sizes, and limits on solid state drive capacities. Increasing the hard disk drive limit from 80 GB to 160 GB should have little effect on the system prices, yet it should add extra appeal to those looking to buy a netbook and increase sales of netbooks featuring HDDs, compared to those featuring SSD storage options.

Although the limits imposed by Microsoft are still tight, they meet the basic requirements needed for what a netbook has been designed for: basic, inexpensive, portable functionality.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
10 comments
    Your comment
  • Why the hell should Microsoft decide what the hardware is in the systems just to license XP onto them? That's complete bull. Another reason just to pirate the damn OS and install it yourself.

    Shooting yourself in the foot, Microsoft...
    1
  • Same with Apple. You're not allowed to build a computer and put OSX on it without the 'stolen' Apple logo. Even a simple upgrade has to be done by Apple instead of the user due to their 'overly-protected-and-perfect' system... Of which we know Apple gets away with a lot
    0
  • Netbooks wouldn't be so sluggish with Vista if Intel would ramp up it's Atom CPU's and design a low-power chipset specifically for the Atom, in favor of the 945.

    A dual-core hyperthreading Atom along with 2GB ram would be plenty to run Vista on a small netbook like the HP mininote.
    0