Microsoft: Pirated Win 7 Causes Malware Outbreak
Microsoft blames pirated copies of Windows 7 for the high rate of malware infections.
Yesterday Microsoft's Jeff Williams, the principal group program manager for the Microsoft Malware Protection Center, said that there is a direct correlation between the current malware infection rate and software piracy. To be more specific, he said that countries with high piracy rates are more likely to be infected by malicious code because they're reluctant to apply updates.
His theory is based on Windows and the security updates that consumers are neglecting to install through Windows Update. Microsoft's latest biannual security intelligence report, found here, claims that China's piracy rate is more than four times than that of the United States. France and Brazil also have extremely high piracy rates, and each country--including China--use Windows Update significantly less than consumers in the U.S.
Has Microsoft kicked itself in the rear with Windows Genuine Advantage? Although the company's pirate sniffing software has been successful in tagging non-legit copies of Windows, WGA is also turning consumers away from the updating process, especially those who bought a copy of Windows and feel justified in installing the OS on multiple computers. While there are cracks available to bypass WGA, there are many users who aren't quite so PC-savvy, leaving them wide open for attack.
As reported by Computerworld, there are also legit users who won't bow down to Microsoft's anti-piracy efforts: users in China, the United States, and other countries have protested against the software since its was originally embedded into the OS. With that said, perhaps Microsoft made the malware infection rate worse by locking out the non-legitimate copies of Windows. After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?
- Hot Deals of the Day: $500 Off Lenovo T400s, More
- MacPadd.com Owner David Free Responds to Us
- Doom Box Art Cover Artist Dies at Age 73
- Company to Avoid: QMS Inc./MacPadd.com
- HighPoint to Release PCI-E 2.0 SATA 6Gb RAID
- Windows 7 Marketshare Jumps Past 3 Percent
- Apple Blocking Intel Netbook CPUs in Mac OS X?
- Asus Launching ''Smartbook'' in Q1 2010
- Gmail Goes Down for Halloween
- Windows 7 Sets Early PC Sales on Fire
- Quad-Interface Blu-Ray Burner at 12x Appears
- Updated! The MacPadd.com/David Free Ultimatum
- Tuan: Follow Me on Twitter and Forums
- Microsoft Cuts Another 800 Workers From Staff
- Deals of the Day: More Hardware, Laptops, Games
- Blizzard Introduces Buying in-Game WoW Items
- Nvidia Making x86 CPU With Ex-Transmeta Brains?
- Super Talent USB 3.0 RAIDDrive is Super Fast







Generally I'd agree. But there's also pirated Windows downloads out there that also has keyloggers, trojans and viruses, both intentional and unintentionally done by its source.
But I think user stupidity is still the primary culprit
"After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?"
They should...I purchased Vista and when I changed some hardware after a HDD crash and reinstalled, my old activation code no longer worked, I then had to call them and waste ~20 mins explaining what I changed to get it activated. I then vowed to never purchase an OS that requires such an activation system again.
Propaganda/distraction from MS. Outbreak of malware means that malware is spreading quickly. The problem is that all legal copies are getting infected also. Just this month MS has released 2 set of patches for IE out bound. Why? Because they thought they fix the problem, but they found out that they missed the target. They rushed new patch that caused some problems. Just today they released fix for that. If their OS had better design (not making windows dependent on IE) may be we was going not to worry about malware so much.
"After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?"They should...I purchased Vista and when I changed some hardware after a HDD crash and reinstalled, my old activation code no longer worked, I then had to call them and waste ~20 mins explaining what I changed to get it activated. I then vowed to never purchase an OS that requires such an activation system again.
Microsoft should be a little more generous with us who pony over the money to buy legit copies of their software. I build or upgrade my computer every 6 months plus I like to do a fresh install of my OS every year or so as to keep it fresh and snappy. Its a pain in the A$$ to call MS everytime I do a fresh install.
If everyone could get updates, why would anyone buy Windows?
"Has Microsoft kicked itself in the rear with Windows Genuine Advantage?"
Pirate, Shareware, Freeware... I have come to realize that free software often has some price attached to it. Be it nag screens, un-advertized features (spyware, ad delivery), or even the occasional unintended completely not working....
"Has Microsoft kicked itself in the rear with Windows Genuine Advantage?"Pirate, Shareware, Freeware... I have come to realize that free software often has some price attached to it. Be it nag screens, un-advertized features (spyware, ad delivery), or even the occasional unintended completely not working....
hahaha "free software" DOES seem attached to advertisement delivery
Generally I'd agree. But there's also pirated Windows downloads out there that also has keyloggers, trojans and viruses, both intentional and unintentionally done by its source.But I think user stupidity is still the primary culprit
I agree with you that a vast majority of malware infections are caused by user stupidity. Just because one is open to infection, doesn't mean that they will become infected, depends on their general intelligence. If you are a moron who clicks links that say, "DO NOT CLICK, WILL INFECT YOUR PC WITH TROJANZ!!!" (in a study I read, a bunch of idiots clicked it on a google ad, of course it didn't infect the users) but you're probably going to get malware, etc. If you're stupid.
The thing that Pissed me off the most with Windows Vista (legally purchased) and WGA was when I would boot my system, half the time, if my system was not connected, when you would right click on My Computer, near the bottom where it says Windows Activation it would say Status Unavailable.
This would irritate the hell out of me as the system would act as if it had never been activated. Just to get the above dialog window, you'd have to click on Start > Run and you would have to enter explorer.exe then when the window opens, you would have to access it that way. Same thing goes for the control panel and Network neighborhood.
WGA just creates more problems than it's worth.
Once Windows has been activated, it should remain activated instead of constantly checking to see if you pirated your own legally purchased copy.
This makes you think of the World Wars, where in some European countries when you had to have your papers on hand, ready to present at a moments notice just to prove who you were.
I know that if you do not own a legit copy of Windows you can't complain for updates, yet MS does very little to combat piracy.
First of all, if there are 3 PCs on a house each running pirated Vista, then the "special" Windows 7 Family Pack won't work (since they're upgrade editions), and it is very unlikely that the owner of the 3 PCs pays for 3 Full Editions of Win 7 ($330), which just worsens the piracy problem.
Then, MS MUST understand that people in developing countries (I live in one) are able to pay for a $110 OS which can just be downloaded for free. Also, exchange rates (such as in my country) make US Dollars too expensive for local people, further making the OS more expensive (example, Win 7 would cost me about $400, local cureency, but the relative cost for a person in the US would be like $250 dollars). I've seen some companies counter this by charging lower prices for software in my country (example: Resident Evil 5 PC costs $25 US dollars here, yet it is not considered entirely "affordable") which can really be a solution to piracy (I mean, analyze the economic situation and act accordingly).
^EDIT
Then, MS MUST understand that people in developing countries (I live in one) are NOT able to pay for a $110 OS which can just be downloaded for free.
Malaware for legit Win 7 >
It sounds like a lot of people that paid for their software are being infected too. Is WGA the real problem?
On a different angle, I think MS should start forcing 3rd party softwares to work properly under a limited account (as opposed to requiring an administrator account). Heck, MS should start making it a pain to use software that requires administrator account. Along with it, MS should, by default, make the default account a limited one (not an admin, w/ or w/o UAC).
Yeah, I know. Legacy software. But then again, when will MS start? Or they don't ever plan to?
Do I even have to mention why?
Let's start with a benign software. What? It wants to install a service just to check for updates? Go ahead. A flaw or bug in that service and you're as good as compromised.
Then there's the compromised software. One can never be too paranoid, especially with legitimate sites (offering software/drivers) regularly being compromised and infecting/replacing files and programs.
"After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?"They should...I purchased Vista and when I changed some hardware after a HDD crash and reinstalled, my old activation code no longer worked, I then had to call them and waste ~20 mins explaining what I changed to get it activated. I then vowed to never purchase an OS that requires such an activation system again.
Stop whining, 20 minutes is not that much time. At most 20 mins every 6 months? The internet made it far easier to pirate and I know people who still use illegal copies of the OS, then ask me to fix their PC as it is not running properly, only to find it has a virus or along those lines and 50% of those times it is part of the disc image they installed the OS with!
Better family pack options would be good, like the 3 user limit with office.
$even pu$hers just bragged with 3% lu$er base (what's the actual "pirated" portion?) and already "Microsoft blames pirated copies of Windows 7 for the high rate of malware infections"?
Poor micro$uxx, already in whining mode. Of course, anyone else is to blame for their failures.
Windblow$ is the greatest!
After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?
Wow...
Better family pack options would be good, like the 3 user limit with office.
Yeah... I own a lot of computers... I only bought one license...
Thogh running an unregistered copy is real easy... 30 days, reset, 30 days, reset... 120 days activation free no worry. =D
I'd say the fact that disabling security and updates are among the first things people do on a new install also helps. Maybe MS should design it better so that it doesn't get on everybody's nerves so much and then they'll keep it enabled.
"After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?"They should...I purchased Vista and when I changed some hardware after a HDD crash and reinstalled, my old activation code no longer worked, I then had to call them and waste ~20 mins explaining what I changed to get it activated. I then vowed to never purchase an OS that requires such an activation system again.
Would this be because you purchased an OEM version.... which isn't meant for consumer use? I've changed parts a number of times with retail versions and never run in to this problem.
I'd be fine with MS's policy of activasion, if only it worked. They have to do something, to protect themselves.
I have only ever had a malware issue twice that had any affect on my pc (other than a notification in my monthly virus scan and a prompt removal) in my lifetime. TBH, most malware comes from searching dodgy sites and installing dodgy software and hokey copies of windows, for these people (of which I have been one at times) they should live with the consequences of their actions. If they want a free OS, use Linux, after all hardly anyone bothers writing malware for that.
Pirated versions are still versions, which are used in daily basis. So it would be logical to allow such PC's to get updates, because it's the reputation of an OS ("pirates" also makes statements and form reviews of an OS).
Piracy was, is and probably always will be near and it shouldn't be ignored and cut off totally, because (my personal opinion) the piracy makes the product available to major part of population and dominating the market, thus in case of being forced to buy something, the "pirate" would most likely buy the same product, he used before.
in the end there's a choise : have many pirated version insecure and deal with the consequences at global scale OR "fight" with piracy in not that brutal way, at the same time makeing your product dominate and rapidly form potential new legimate users.
On a different angle, I think MS should start forcing 3rd party softwares to work properly under a limited account (as opposed to requiring an administrator account). Heck, MS should start making it a pain to use software that requires administrator account. Along with it, MS should, by default, make the default account a limited one (not an admin, w/ or w/o UAC).Yeah, I know. Legacy software. But then again, when will MS start? Or they don't ever plan to?Do I even have to mention why?Let's start with a benign software. What? It wants to install a service just to check for updates? Go ahead. A flaw or bug in that service and you're as good as compromised.Then there's the compromised software. One can never be too paranoid, especially with legitimate sites (offering software/drivers) regularly being compromised and infecting/replacing files and programs.
They DO make it a pain to use software requiring admin account... UAC. Problem is everyone screams like a bitch when they try and make their OS more secure (just look at the outcry over vista's mor eharsh use of UAC).. they cannot 'force' 3rd parties to write their programs in a certain way.
I agree with you that a vast majority of malware infections are caused by user stupidity. Just because one is open to infection, doesn't mean that they will become infected, depends on their general intelligence. If you are a moron who clicks links that say, "DO NOT CLICK, WILL INFECT YOUR PC WITH TROJANZ!!!" (in a study I read, a bunch of idiots clicked it on a google ad, of course it didn't infect the users) but you're probably going to get malware, etc. If you're stupid.
Agreed, more and more in this world we are refusing to take responsibility for our own actions, always seeking to pin the blame on whoever sold, gave, loaned, acted for, us the products/services we use. It's one of the worst traits of modern society. It won't be long until we see ads like these:
"have you been involved in a malicious software attack that wasn't your fault?"
Probably on spyware loaded, clickable, ad banners.
Many people who have these versions will have experience in getting safe/ clean versions
the problem is with any OS, if a user is not secure then their OS wont be secure.
at my college, most of the macs, all of the windows, and many of the computers running a linux based OS are infected by malware
you cant make a fully secure OS as if you create a OS that protects the user from them self, the user will not want to use it.
also windows 7 has many new security problems which leaves it open to exploits, (new code = security holes) and microsoft feels a need to blame their poor security pirated versions.
Imo WGA is a great tool. I hate the fact that I have to accept installing it in an otherwise noninteractive enviroment, but the tool successfully prevents most wannabe pirates from not buying a license. I find the windows license too expensive, but the wga system is legit nevertheless. If it wouldn't block windows updates what good would it do to have it? If pirated versions then attract malware, so be it. It's the customers choice if he wants to pay for security or not. Saving money can be costly ; that's nothing new.
Since when should piracy be rewarded? I agree that WGA should get a second look so that it causes legit users less hassles, however, having this sort of system in place is at least attempting to thwart piracy.
Then, MS MUST understand that people in developing countries (I live in one) are NOT able to pay for a $110 OS which can just be downloaded for free.
Then live without a new OS. No money, no product. Use linux since that is free.
"After all, if 41-percent of the world is running pirated Windows, maybe Microsoft should reconsider WGA?"
That 41% is the reason why we even have WGA. Now THAT is kicking yourself in the ass. Pretty sad how everyone feels justified in receiving a product for free.
I can ensure you that 95% of these pirated copies are getting updates!!
Honestly, if people don't want to pay for Windows, they should just use Linux instead of pirating Windows.
If you want an OS for free, then choose a freeware option, instead of stealing a paid-for product. Otherwise, don't complain about a company's attempt to stop illegal copies from working correctly.
Most of these pirated copies are running windows updates no problem. The fact is that if Microsoft does away with WGA it would not matter because they would still pirate Windows, the Chinese steal, that's their culture. Also did anyone here about the Chinese anti virus company IO Bits getting busted for stealing other companies tech. http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3- [...] 7342862873
It's no wonder the Chinese progress so fast when you don't need to spend money on R&D but can just steal every thing and save time and money. I also don't know why countries keep turning a blind eye to the massive espionage campaigns they run in all levels of society, whether college students, business, government, military etc.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/fron [...] spy/spies/
If you use a PC everyday on Win7, you should just buy it.
Someday you'll work (perhaps already like me), so, what if someone steal part of your paycheck or steal a part of your work and claim his own ?
The licence cost 2 to 4 day of work and it's valid for at least 3 years. (time for build a new version). You don't have to try to patch your Genuire... cause a lot of trouble and I don't talk about time lost.
I think people find the price high and actually doesn't count time lost on genuire patch... surf "how to" on the web.
You don't need to paid for Win7 Ultimate. Win7 Home Premium or Professional are enough.
On other part, I paid for Win 7 Professional and I feel "bad" because my licence is just a sticker (COA). MS should register your COA to your name/fullname/passcode when you active it. So if someone stole your PC, you should be able to report it to MS, identify the next web connection using this key. And if the key is use on another PC (because someone stole me my retail box), I should just call and they give me another one.
I think MS doesn't take time "to THINK" for stop PIRATING version.
They have some many thing to think about it...
Why does Microsoft give a shit about the people who get malware because of their pirated copy. Hell if I was Microsoft I would embed code that if you copy wasn't genuine to flood your computer with malware viruses etc. And don't give me that crap that half these places don't have internet or phones to activate it.