Best offers
|
My Passport Essential 500GB Portable... | $99.95 PC Connection More info |
|
Caviar Black 1TB Hard Drive (Serial... | $99.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
My Book Essential Edition External... | $148.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
X25-M Gen2 160GB 2.5" Solid State... | $509.95 PC Connection More info |
|
My Passport Essential Portable 320GB... | $134.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
Perfect Consumer Backup With Seagate And Rebit
Seagate’s Replica is a portable hard drive with automatic backup, versioning, and disaster recovery features to make backup a no-brainer. The product works so well that it deserves our rare Best of Tom’s Award. Read More
-
Picking A Hard Drive For Your NAS: New Green Beats Old Speed
When it comes to mechanical hard drive performance, 7,200 RPM drives are considered the fastest. But does that convention apply in a NAS environment as well? We compare network storage performance with a handful of Samsung's "green" drives to see. Read More
-
Thecus N8800 NAS/SAN: Quick-Look
After recently running out of room on my Thecus N5200, I again turned to the company for something larger. What I found won't work for most folks (unless you have a rack in your garage, that is). But it's reasonably-priced and plenty fast for most SMBs. Read More
Partners
The Games selection
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
Quad-Interface Blu-Ray Burner at 12x Appears
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (36) |
- Share
This external Blu-ray burner offers four ways to connect to a PC or Mac.
Looking for an external (or internal) drive to store all those "special files" on disk? Look no further than OWC's Mercury Pro 12x Blu-ray burner, using a Pioneer BDR-205 and costing a whopping $349.99 USD. This Blu-ray drive supports burning up to 50 GB of data or high-definition video on BD-R dual-layer media at 12x speed; the drive burns at 2x when using BD-RE. Or, if you prefer sticking to the old-school DVDs, consumers can cram 8.5 GB on a dual-layer disk at 16x; CD-R media burns at 40x.
But what makes this device really cool is its quad interface, offering four ways for consumers to connect the burner to a Mac or PC. Offering pure Plug & Play support, the Mercury Pro provides FireWire 800 (two ports), FireWire 400 (one port), USB 2.0 (one port), and eSATA (one port). The drive also includes cables for each connection.
For $449.99 USB, OWC is also offering this bundle, throwing in Roxio's Toast 10 Titanium Pro but it's only compatible with Macintosh hardware, requiring Mac OS X v10.5.x. Of course, Windows users have a plethora of more advaned burning utilities.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
CES 2007: Lacie announces $1150 Blu-ray burner
Pre CES 2007 coverage - Las Vegas (NV) - Lacie will be hitting the Consumer Electronics Show with a bunch of new products. Perhaps most significantly an external Blu-ray writer, Firewire speakers as well as a biometric access hard drive. Get a glimpse of what Lacie will be showing. There is no question that Blu-ray has not yet lived up to the hype its supporters generated at the 2006 Consumer Electronics Show one year ago. We expect the format to come out in force this year once again and try to reinvigorate the enthusiasm for the technology. Lacie is first to announce a new Blu-ray product, which the company claims will be the first external Windows/Mac Blu-ray burner available on a worldwide basis. Lacie d2 Blu-ray drive The d2 Blu-ray drive comes with dual USB/Firewire interfaces and supports 25 GB as well as 50 GB BD-Rs/Res and the preceding rewritable DVD and CD formats. There is not much change in terms of pricing from last year, which means that you will pay quite a bit for such devices. Lacie will charge $1150 for this external burner, but at least that will include a 50 GB BD-R disc and Roxio burning software. It is unclear at this time, if the device will include Blu-ray playback software, just in case you have a HD capable graphics system consisting of a HDCP-equipped graphics card and monitor. Lacie also announced a stylish pair of speakers, which connect to a Firewire port. As of now, we aren't sure what advantage that will bring to users besides occupying a port that isn't too common on the average PC anyway, but we'll find out when we will talk to Lacie representatives at CES. For now, the company promises that the designer speaker set will offer excellent sound fidelity for $80. Lacie Firewire speakers The company also announced the d2 Safe Hard Drive, which uses fingerprint recognition to protect data from unauthorized access. Up to ten fingerprints can be recognized by the drive, which sells for $300 in a 500 GB version. The same amount of money will also buy a new 500 GB Backup hard drive ("Quadra") which enables users, much like in similar solution offered for example by Maxtor, to launch back ups by touching a button. On the higher-end side, Lacie will be displaying network storage solutions with capacities of up to 1 TB for $500 and RAID 5 network storage solutions.
-
We’re glad that someone at AMD let us know about the 740G chipset; else it likely would have slipped under the radar. Not that we would have been missing something new—740G is really one part 690G and one part SB700, yielding a mixed platform centering on old technology, but still able to serve up a respectable list of features. The bright side is that 740G-based motherboards are priced anywhere from $55 to $65 dollars. The 740G Northbridge AMD’s 740G connects to a Socket AM2 interface by means of its HyperTransport 1.0 interface. If you were planning on building a budget box using an Athlon X2 anyway, the step back from HyperTransport 3.0 won’t affect performance at all. But if you instead use a Phenom X3 or X4, the chipset will force those CPUs to run at a 1 GHz interface speed. Naturally, because memory support is determined by the processor you choose (and its integrated memory controller), the 740G shouldn’t affect you there. However, it is worth noting that the integrated graphics core—unaided by onboard side-port memory—relies on memory bandwidth performance for gaming. If you drop in an Athlon X2, as we have for our most value-oriented configuration, you’ll top out at 800 MHz DDR2 memory. Swap in a Phenom X4 9850 for comparison and you’ll have the bandwidth of 1066 MHz modules at your disposal instead. Can the graphics core even do anything with that extra memory throughput? After all, the 740G is derived from AMD’s 690G, which takes its design cues from the old ATI Radeon X700. It includes four pixel pipelines that satisfy Microsoft’s DirectX 9 SM 2.0b specification—a far cry from the Shader Model 4.0 parts we’ve spent so much time playing with lately. The core runs at 400 MHz, and the BIOS included with our Gigabyte MA74GM-S2 allows manual overclocking of the GPU, though the 80nm part isn’t likely to be as flexible as the 55nm 780G. A pair of independent display outputs (VGA and DVI in the case of our sample) sets the stage for as many as four monitor outputs if you add an inexpensive discrete board. Remember, this is older technology. So while AMD does include its Avivo video processing engine, it isn’t the Avivo HD block introduced with AMD’s DirectX 10 parts. You do get scaling support, decode acceleration for MPEG-2, and 3:2 pulldown detection. Not part of the package is acceleration of Blu-ray content—a handicap that you’ll see manifest itself in our benchmarks. The SB700 Southbridge All there is to know about AMD’s SB700 southbridge is already known. And it’s hardly exciting after the announcement of SB750 alongside the 790GX platform. Nevertheless SB700 is at least a step up from the SB600 component that accompanied 690G. With SB700, you get six SATA 3 Gb/s ports with RAID 0, 1, and 10 support (RAID 5 surfaced with SB750). The I/O controller also enables 14 USB ports, 12 of which are of the USB 2.0 variety. And of course, the southbridge has the same troubles with AHCI as AMD’s other storage components. We tried to get Vista installed with AHCI enabled, just to be sure, and the setup hung before completing. The Platform More important than the chipset itself is the platform we’re building with it. Truly a product of penny-pinching in the name of science, we actually put together quite the collection of go-fast hardware. 740G Platform Motherboard Gigabyte MA74GM-S2 Processor AMD Athlon X2 4850e @ 2.5 GHz Memory 4 GB (2 x 2 GB) Corsair Dominator DDR2-1066 5-5-5 Graphics Radeon 2100 Integrated Hard Drive Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500 GB SATA 3 Gb/s Total cost for the platform, sans optical drive (grab a dual-layer DVD burner for $35) and chassis (InWin’s BK623 with a 300W power supply runs $60) is about $360. With those other components, you’re looking at a $450 machine. Spend an extra $50 on graphics, and the platform becomes even more capable. The benefits of this setup are clearly upfront cost- and energy-related. Though the CPU runs at 2.5 GHz and sports two cores (each with 512 KB of L2), it’s a 45 W part sitting on a microATX motherboard with integrated graphics. In fact, you could probably shave $75 off the price by stepping back to 2GB of DDR2-800 (we used Corsair’s Dominator modules for the sake of drawing an even comparison to the other benchmarked configurations).
-
The Area-51 m17x can be conveniently configured at home using Alienware’s informative configurator. Some of the components on our sample, such as the GeForce 9800M GT graphics cards, aren’t yet available through the site. But you can expect them to be a standard option soon. Processor Though the Core 2 Extreme X9000 isn’t the fastest mobile processor in Intel’s arsenal of Penryn-based CPUs, it’s right up there, just underneath the 3.06 GHz X9100 and newer quad-core QX9300. The X9000 operates at 2.8 GHz on an 800 MHz front side bus. Each of the chip’s two cores has its own 32 KB instruction and data cache, and a shared 6 MB L2 repository mimics the Wolfdale desktop design. The 44W Core 2 Extreme drops into Intel’s mobile Socket P interface; this is a true mobile platform, despite its large size and meaty graphics subsystem. The CPU supports dynamic front side bus throttling, Enhanced SpeedStep Technology, and of course, the C6 Deep Power Down state. In any other notebook, those features might actually be appreciated. Of course, this is a gaming platform first and foremost, and as we’ll see from the battery run time measurements, power consumption probably won’t be your first concern with a desktop replacement machine like this one. Rather, performance is the most important factor here. Memory Alienware employs an ASUS-designed board based on Intel’s PM965 chipset to drive its m17x. Despite the Centrino 2 launch in July, the platform is still not quite ubiquitous as you’ll see from some of our other gaming systems. As such, memory support is limited to DDR2-667. The Area-51 m17x sample we received included two 2 GB modules of Quimonda’s DDR2-667 memory—all of which was visible to the copy of Vista Home Premium that Alienware sent with the notebook (likely due to manually forcing PAE mode and theoretically incurring a small performance hit). However, in the interest of normalizing our test subjects, we reinstalled Vista Ultimate, took the ding in capacity to get slightly faster memory addressing, and continued with benchmarking. Graphics Being the big dog in town has its advantages. In this case, Alienware’s muscle means that it’s one of the first vendors to get its hands on Nvidia’s GeForce 9800M GT mobile graphics cards—and the Area-51 m17x has two of them connected through a fragile little SLI ribbon cable. Now, here’s the interesting part. Although the 9800M GT might sound bigger and badder than last-generation’s 8800-series, both are actually based on the same G92M core manufactured at 65 nm. In fact, the 9800M GT and 8800M GTX in Killer Notebooks’ Odachi are both revision A2 parts with 330 square millimeter die and 754 million transistors. Not that there’s anything wrong with the 9800M. Just bear in mind that it centers on similar technology before you let Nvidia’s poor choice in naming convention fool you into thinking you’re getting something better. On the flip side, the 9800M GT is still a very capable part, armed with 96 shader processing units and 16 render back-ends. No less than 512 MB of GDDR3 memory on a 256-bit bus enables a tad more than 51 GB/s. Each of the m17x’s two GPUs is clocked at 500 MHz with 1,250 MHz shaders. The GDDR3 memory runs at 799 MHz, per TechPowerUp’s GPU-Z. Of course, keep in mind that the PM965 chipset comes equipped with 16 lanes of PCI Express 1.1 connectivity, so the 9800Ms must share that data pathway, although GPU-Z reports each card running on its own x16 interface. When we checked in with Alienware, representatives confirmed that the company uses a bridge chip to make a pair of x16 pathways available. But you can’t get around the fact that the PM965 is going to bottleneck graphics performance one way or another. Storage Alienware arms the Area-51 m17x with a pair of 500 GB Samsung SpinPoint H6 HM500LI 2.5” SATA drives—a tremendously spacious disk given its 9.5 mm height. Spinning at 5,400 RPM and armed with 8 MB of cache, these wouldn’t seem to be the best choice for a high-performance gaming machine. However, Alienware uses the RAID 0 capabilities of Intel’s ICH8-M controller to stripe them together into a 1 TB configuration. A quick word of warning here: striping two drives together on a notebook carries the same risks as it does on a desktop with the added peril of bumping, throwing, and dropping those sensitive components in a portable machine. Even stationary on our test bench, one of the two HM500LIs started throwing up errors as we installed benchmarks. And while neither drive failed outright, the error warnings should be enough to give any enthusiast pause when it comes to RAID 0 on a notebook. Networking Gigabit Ethernet and Intel’s Wireless 4965 a/b/g/draft-n mini-card both come standard on the m17x, with no option to remove either. It’s all the same to us—the freedom to hook up to high-speed Gigabit or the latest draft-n routers is functionality we’d want anyway. Chassis/LCD By virtue of its name, the m17x sports a 17” widescreen LCD. Alienware’s options include an XGA+ display with a maximum resolution of 1440x900, a 1920x1200 UXGA display sans illuminated keyboard, or the same panel, plus AlienFX keyboard. Though the dual GeForce 9800M GTs are not always sufficient to run games at 1920x1200, the higher-resolution screen is incredibly sharp in Windows at its native resolution. The chassis itself is kept classy. There’s an infrared receiver on the front of the notebook, which works with an optional ATSC MiniCard TV tuner and ExpressCard-based Media Center Remote Control. The right side of the chassis features a card reader, an ExpressCard bay, a USB 2.0 port, an HDMI output, a FireWire 800 connector, a FireWire 400 port, and an RJ-45 jack for Gigabit Ethernet. The left side boasts three more USB 2.0 ports, speaker/mic/headphone connections, optical audio output, and a CATV input. Of course, there’s also a bay for an optical device (or a SmartBay, if you need more hard drive capacity). Alienware’s choice in optical drives ranges from an 8x dual-layer DVD drive to a Blu-ray player (and DVD burner) to a 2x Blu-ray DL burner. The back, like the front, is nothing but screens and ventilation, which is nice since so many competing whitebooks tend to situate fans on the bottom of the chassis where they’re easily blocked. The Area-51 m17x includes a 12-cell 6,600 mAh battery, which you’ll see in the battery benchmark doesn’t last long when you’re driving such serious computing hardware.









Neat product, but I don't think it justifies the 350$ price tag. I could build another computer for that much.
A step in the right direction, but the media def has not caught up in price to justify it now.
Even those professionals that could make use out of something like this probably have something equivalent or better at a commercial grade level.
I don't see this going far. I see sites like Hulu seeing double or even triple the users in the next year or so due to the increasing popularity of Netbooks - of which do not have a CD/DVD drive, With Windows 7's simplified and improved file-sharing system; it is now easy for anyone with a Netbook to watch a movie that is in the DVD/Blu-Ray drive of another computer.
Omg you spelled advanced wrong! Fix it before all the haters complain how Tom's is going downhill.
$449.99 USB?
isn't it USD??
12x Blu Ray speeds on 4x Blu Ray disc speeds = 4x speed... well worth the $450 price tag.
Honestly unless I'm buring 100 different blue rays a week this purchase makes absolutly no sense. dvd burners are so cheap now why would you spend like 10x the amount? 1 TB of storage also goes for like less $100. And actually if you have like $300 you probably get like what? 6-10 TB or 200 blue ray disks. And if you need the backup blue ray discs which are mainly movies won't you just go buy the lost copy again?
nice mac compatible... if only it was firewire
Wait it is firewire... 400 and 800.. nice!
$449.99 USB?isn't it USD??
hehe, classic Kevin
pretty sweet connectivity, pretty pricey too but probably worth it.
does it mean you can connect upto 4 PC's to this?
Love it when hardware comes with every possible cable configuration, OWC gets a thumbs up for that if nothing else.
Why on earth would you need Firewire 800 on a device that couldn't possibly utilize a full USB 2.0 connection at 480 Mbps?
The price is a huge OUCH....BD Drives and burners are still too expencive...
hehe, classic Kevin
I am frankly surprised he is still employed by THG. He has NO CONCEPT of proof reading.
But, then again, THG really took a dive after Dr. Tom Pabst sold it to "Bestofmedia Group" (which is a bit of a contradiction).
...sigh
It's great that they made it multi-platform compatible so Mac users have the Blu-ray option PC users have had for so long now, but why did they have to give it the Mac style price tag?
Of course, Windows users have a plethora of more advaned burning utilities.
That seems like an attack on Macintosh...
You and Tuan want to go into the boxing ring and duke it out over whose better?
I'd love to see that Mac vs. PC commercial. =D
By the way, spell check please.
$350 is a bit too rich for me, so I guess my $30 internal will have to do.
I actually purchased (a while back; don't know if still available) just the quad-connective enclosure, and then can put whatever drive I want in it. Right now it's just a BD-ROM, but down the road (when the discs are affordable), I can swap in a burner...or whatever other optical storage device comes around.
I believe it was ~$90.
Not cheap, but to be able to hook it up to my old PC (eSata card added) or my Macbook Pro (which of course doesn't have a blu ray drive, and is also running eSata via an expresscard, but which I hoookup via Firewire 800) makes it a very worthwhile solution.
I don't see this going far. I see sites like Hulu seeing double or even triple the users in the next year or so due to the increasing popularity of Netbooks - of which do not have a CD/DVD drive, With Windows 7's simplified and improved file-sharing system; it is now easy for anyone with a Netbook to watch a movie that is in the DVD/Blu-Ray drive of another computer.
The online file sharing is the precursor to cloud computing. But would you save your entire family photo albums on google? some things are worth burning. At 5 Mb a jpg you need blu-ray.
At last an eSata media burner! (or at least it's the first one I've encountered thus far)
Only problem though is that even a 50GB media (and a very expansive one I should add) isn't all that useful for backup when hard drive space is in TeraBytes.
I think I'm gonna skip Blu-Ray, and just wait for the next format. It has been too long and the prices still won't drop 200$ for a burner(just checked on newegg). I really can't justify paying that much for an optical drive. Not to mention the media isn't exactly cheap.
I really hate Sony for creating this whole mess.
Skipping till the next format. It shouldn't be long now.
£52 for an int BD sata drive. £45 or less for an external dvdrw. Done
Sry too much money still, I'd rather buy a Blu-ray reader/dvd burner and rip the blu-ray to something smaller file size like .mkv etc..
We have over 8,000 satisfied customers...
2 days ago his site said he had 5,000 satisfied customers, that's a lot of mouse pads (1d Free, not 2) to sell in 2 days.
the reliability of burned optical disks is not as good as manufactured optical disks -period- . even the costs do not justify themselves . for 90-110 dollars i can get 1 tb hdd = about 19/20 "dual layer" disks' capacity free of dust , scratches and capable of reading and writing itself . for a few more get eSata external .
whats ok is bluray readers , they are needed .
Still waiting for Blue-ray 2nd gen to come out so they will be more affordable and faster.
The online file sharing is the precursor to cloud computing. But would you save your entire family photo albums on google? some things are worth burning. At 5 Mb a jpg you need blu-ray.
LOL Why would you need blu-ray? You can get an external 1TB HD for ~$100, which is faster and easier to back-up your pictures and/or data with. Not to mention its also a lot more reliable than optical media.
So no, you don't need "blu-ray" for that. Just a USB port and an external hard drive.
The new cool stuff is always so expensive...
I am of the same opinion, that this would have a fairly small market right now. I have no need for a bluray burner. I suppose I might in the future if I were making my own hidef home movies, but I would certainly wait until prices fell. Quite a lot acutally.
Ditto eccentric, an external HD makes a lot of sense as far as storage goes.
an external HDD (or internal, for that matter) is a mixed bag, unless it's RAIDed; I've had EVERY major brand of hard drive fail on me at one point or another. Other friends have lost critical data as well. Optical media, while it does "die" eventually, seems a much more 'stable' solution in many regards; I have CD-R's that work just fine dating from 1998. Then again, I have hard drives that have worked since then, too (though none have been actually USED in years...).
I would definitely back up to blu ray...if the cost of the media wasn't so absurd. It's not the price of the burners that's limiting its adoption rate...
If you want "safe" HDD backups, you either need to RAID 1 or RAID 5 -- both of which can be costly endeavors. Ironically, it's the path I've currently taken (Drobo).