Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel Announces New 320 SSD Series

By - Source: Intel | B 32 comments

Intel's new line of SSDs is based on 25-nm NAND flash memory and offers up to 600 GB of storage.

Monday Intel officially launched a new line of 2.5-inch solid-state drives (SSDs) called the 320 Series. The new line replaces and builds upon Intel's current high-performing X25-M SATA SSDs, offering better performance and reliability.

According to Intel, the 320 SSDs are based on 25-nm Intel NAND Flash Memory which should offer a 30-percent price reduction compared to second-generation drives. That also means consumers will see larger storage capacities of up to 600 GB thanks to the 25-nm processing and lower manufacturing costs.

"Intel designed new quality and reliability features into our SSDs to take advantage of the latest 25nm silicon, so we could deliver cost advantages to our customers," said Pete Hazen, director of marketing for the Intel Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) Solutions Group.

Targeting mainstream consumers, corporate IT or PC enthusiasts looking for a performance boost over HDDs, the 320 Series arrives with 40 GB, 80 GB, 120 GB, 160 GB, 300 GB and 600 GB versions. Surprisingly, all six will use the SATA 3.0 Gb/s interface (rather than the speedier SATA 6.0 Gb/s), but that also means the drives will be supported by "more than 1 billion" SATA 3.0 Gb/s PCs already sitting in homes and businesses worldwide.

On the technical front, Intel's 320 Series produces up to 39,500 input/output operations per second (IOPS) random reads and 23,000 IOPS random writes on its highest-capacity drives. They also provide up to 220 MB/s sequential writes and up to 270 MB/s sequential reads. Intel also threw in 128-bit Advanced Encryption Standard capabilities on every drive, to help protect personal data in the event of theft or loss.

"Already one of the most solid-performing SSDs over time, Intel continues to raise the bar on SSD reliability in the way it has architected its third generation, using proprietary firmware and controller, to further demonstrate that not all solid-state drives are created equal. In this rendition, Intel creatively uses spare area to deploy added redundancies that will help keep user data protected, even in the event of a power loss," the company said.

Although consumer pricing wasn't provided, tags for retailers purchasing the new SSDs in quantities of 1000 are $89 for the 40 GB version, $159 for 80 GB, $209 for 120 GB, $289 for 160 GB, $520 for 300 GB and $1,069 for 600 GB.

Intel SSDs can be purchased in the United States from such retailers as Best Buy or Fry’s Electronics, plus a variety of resellers, retailers or Internet e-tailers such as Newegg.com or Amazon.com worldwide.

Discuss
Display all 32 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    scook9 , March 28, 2011 7:07 PM
    Shame these weren't out last to beat the sandforce first gen stuff

    Now everyone cares only about Sata 3 :( 

    If I had not just gotten a pair of G2 120GB drives I would have gotten these instead
  • 0 Hide
    kcorp2003 , March 28, 2011 7:08 PM
    waiting on the new Z68 chipset to see what kind features it offers for SDD/HDD setups. I can probably afford the 80GB model.
  • 1 Hide
    thrasher32 , March 28, 2011 7:20 PM
    $1069 for the 600GB version??? OUCH
  • 3 Hide
    JamesSneed , March 28, 2011 7:25 PM
    "more than 1 billion" SATA 3.0 Gb/s PCs already sitting in homes and businesses worldwide." Here I thought drives with SATA 6.0 Gb/s are backwards compitible SATA 3.0 Gb/s controllers.
  • 0 Hide
    eklipz330 , March 28, 2011 7:32 PM
    thrasher32$1069 for the 600GB version??? OUCH

    that's less than $2 per gig!!!
  • 0 Hide
    jprahman , March 28, 2011 7:35 PM
    I don't quite get why these drives don't support SATA III. I mean the listed reason is compatibility, but SATA III drives were compatible with SATA II controllers.
  • 0 Hide
    JohnnyLucky , March 28, 2011 7:36 PM
    The bulk of the Intel advertising indicates the 320 is a "mid-level" ssd and the target audience consists of users with SATA II (3 Gb/s) systems. Looks to me like Intel knows where their "bread and butter" is. At 1 billion pc's there is an awful lot.
  • 0 Hide
    ap3x , March 28, 2011 7:39 PM
    thrasher32$1069 for the 600GB version??? OUCH


    Huh, that is a great price for 600gig SSD. Are you commenting that that is just allot of money in general or a high price for a SSD. I have never seen a decent performing SSD at 500+ gig for less than that?
  • 1 Hide
    jprahman , March 28, 2011 7:51 PM
    Quote:
    The bulk of the Intel advertising indicates the 320 is a "mid-level" ssd and the target audience consists of users with SATA II (3 Gb/s) systems. Looks to me like Intel knows where their "bread and butter" is. At 1 billion pc's there is an awful lot.


    I understand that, but since SATA III drives are backwards compatible with SATA II systems, then why not have the drive support SATA III for those that do have SATA III systems. I mean I can't think of a good reason other than a possible small increase in cost not to make the drive SATA III.
  • 0 Hide
    maxiim , March 28, 2011 8:10 PM
    Dont forget those are wholesale prices for retailers, I'm sure that 1069 is gonna be a good 1200+ per if not more.
  • 1 Hide
    zerapio , March 28, 2011 8:12 PM
    jprahmanI understand that, but since SATA III drives are backwards compatible with SATA II systems, then why not have the drive support SATA III for those that do have SATA III systems. I mean I can't think of a good reason other than a possible small increase in cost not to make the drive SATA III.

    If the new drives aren't saturating SATA II then why use SATA III then?
  • 0 Hide
    ap3x , March 28, 2011 8:30 PM
    Quote:
    If the new drives aren't saturating SATA II then why use SATA III then?


    There are some drives that almost saturate SATA II. Not sure if this one can since there is no performance data on the article. One thing though, the fact that they are talking about longevity as their value rather than performance does somewhat indicate that the performance is probably nothing to get excited about.
  • 0 Hide
    NightLight , March 28, 2011 9:02 PM
    great news. hope they put out more so prices can go even lower!
  • 0 Hide
    ThisIsMe , March 28, 2011 9:08 PM
    Even if they do almost saturate the enitre sata II interface and use almost all the bandwidth, there would still be no benefit to move to sata III. There are relatively few sata III mother boards/controllers in use. And even fewer drives that can actually utilize it for what it's worth. So if they had added sata III it would have meant including more expensive parts and adding to the final price. In the end there would be no real benefit and only more cost for the consumer.
  • 1 Hide
    wiyosaya , March 28, 2011 9:26 PM
    The 300 GB drive is cheapest on a $/GB basis.
  • -1 Hide
    lamorpa , March 28, 2011 9:30 PM
    Quote:
    That also means consumers will see larger storage capacities of up to 600 GB thanks to the 25-nm processing and lower manufacturing costs.


    Anyone follow this reasoning?
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , March 28, 2011 9:35 PM
    Hmm, people don't seem to realize that those prices are for bulk purchases... I expect a 15 to 20% markup minimum when you can buy them.
  • 0 Hide
    darkguset , March 28, 2011 11:18 PM
    lamorpaAnyone follow this reasoning?


    Yields will increase, which means lower costs for Intel, and therefore can pass those savings on to the consumer.
  • 1 Hide
    dogman_1234 , March 28, 2011 11:22 PM
    ...or to themselves...
  • 0 Hide
    malphas , March 28, 2011 11:24 PM
    darkgusetYields will increase, which means lower costs for Intel, and therefore can pass those savings on to the consumer.

    Uhm, yes actually. Why? Don't you?
Display more comments