U.S. Advises Secure Control Systems Against Anonymous
A recently published bulletin by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security shows that the government has a close eye on hacker group Anonymous, especially in their shift in interest.
The latest report provides an assessment of Anonymous' capability to penetrate Industry Control Systems (ICS) and gain access to infrastructural networks, which follows up on a previous report that investigated the group's ability to develop new cyber attack tools.
According to the current evaluation, the government believes that Anonymous has shown that it can access ICS, but may not have the ability to actually understand the structure and inner workings of such software yet. There is speculation that Anonymous may be interested in gaining that knowledge, especially through freely available sources: "Free educational opportunities (conferences, classes), presentations at hacker conferences, and other high profile events/media coverage have raised awareness to ICS vulnerabilities, and likely shortened the time needed to develop sufficient tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to disrupt ICS," the report states.
However, the government's concern is that the simple capability of "recognizing and posting code", which Anonymous has done, for example, in the case of Siemens Simatic control software, "could gain the attention of those knowledgeable in control systems". However, at least in this unclassified report, there is no clear answer why the government believes that Anonymous appears to have increased interest in ICS, especially those that are tied to its "hacktivist" campaigns.
The report concludes:
"While Anonymous recently expressed intent to target ICS, they have not demonstrated a capability to inflict damage to these systems, instead choosing to harass and embarrass their targets using rudimentary attack methods, readily available to the research community. Anonymous does have the ability to impact aspects of critical infrastructure that run on common, internet accessible systems (such as web-based applications and windows systems) by employing tactics such as denial of service."
The advice to ICS owners is to make sure their security needs of their control system assets are addressed.
It's not that kind of organization, it's not even an organization.
TPB? You mean, The Pirate Bay? Why, what's up with them? Up and running, and the "Legal Threats" section is hilarious.
These "script kiddies" caused quite a lot of mischief. If anything, I definitely respect their skills
It's not that kind of organization, it's not even an organization.
Exactly, when did people start thinking its ok to force their opinions on someone else? In the united states we call that dictatorship which is what anonymous is trying to do by forcing people to believe in what they believe by DDOSing, disrupting sites, protesting, etc... What happens if they win? Will we become slaves to them then? Because this is what happens in any country where the people overthrow a government.
I don't want anonymous deciding right and wrong for me, i want to make that decision myself and not have it enforced on me.
Personally I am torn on the idea of hactavism. I think it a great idea to show that companies need to take proper precautions with personal information, and that corporations and governments should not infringe on the people's rights. But the way they do things often make things worse for the people, which makes me think they are in it simply as hackers who are desperately trying to justify their actions in order to attract nieve morons.
TPB? You mean, The Pirate Bay? Why, what's up with them? Up and running, and the "Legal Threats" section is hilarious.
The US did not become a dictatorship when they overthrew the Brittish. But then again it was not a small group of personalities who lead the rebellion. It was a wide-spread movement where nobody wanted absolute power, because they all wanted freedom. While most rebellions do not end this way, it is wrong to say that every single one does.
Since the populace is too dumb to take important decisions?
Agree, time is running out for them...
They are reversed way too much.
Maybe, maybe not. All I said is that they can cause mischief, and that's always fun.
Let me emphasize that.
yea but they could have just looked at the systems and found there was an easy way to get around the security. so yea there script kiddies
I'd have to disagree with your assessment. The reality is that Anonymous isn't seeking to do real damage. Bringing down a website, and say bringing down the Air Traffic control system, are two different things, and anonymous isn't into actually endangering peoples lives and such, just being a nuisance.
So you're saying that any time someone makes a protest they're supporting a dictatorship?
Exactly, Anonymous has no structure, simply put, it's a collective of individuals with hacking skillz that do XY and Z because someone posts hey let's attack XY and Z , hacker community, and then of course the hackers that do it, want to remain anonymous. It's just an idea to hide behind both literally and figuratively.