Best offers
|
Edge Z30 Midsize Desktop (2.66GHz... | $1099.00 Velocity Micro More info |
|
iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz... | $1699.00 ABT More info |
|
Pavilion p6210f Mini-Tower Desktop... | $599.98 STAPLES More info |
|
Compaq Presario CQ5210F Mini-Tower... | $399.98 STAPLES More info |
|
iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz... | $1169.00 MacConnection More info |
System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: AMD System Value Compared
Our response to reader-demand for AMD systems focuses on the company’s penchant for gaming value across three budget classes. How do these fully-optimized systems compare to each other in ultimate performance and value? Read More
-
System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: $2,500 Performance PC
Reader suggestions and previous test results defined most of this month’s highest-priced build. Will the extra planning and testing pay off in clear overclocking and performance superiority? We use Radeon HD 4890s, SSDs, and 8GB of RAM to find out! Read More
-
System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: $1,250 Enthusiast Build
With a limited budget and high-resolution gaming in our sights, we spice up this quarter's $1,250 build with as many graphics cards as we can fit into a mid-range chassis. By popular request, this one's an all-AMD build with plenty of horsepower. Read More
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Scoobydoo: Episode 2
The sequel of Scooby and Sammy's adventures. Same principle as in the previous episode (available on this website). Click on "Instructions" to see...
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
Sponsored links
Apple iMac Goes Core i5, i7; Mac Mini Updated
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (88) |
- Share
iMac gets i5, i7.
Along with the new MacBook and Magic Mouse, Apple today refreshed its entire iMac line with LED-backlit 21.5 and 27-inch widescreen displays in a new edge-to-edge glass design and all aluminum enclosure that pulls it even closer in line with the unibody MacBook Pros.
The new iMac line starts at $1,199 with the 21.5-inch screen and Core 2 Duo at 3.06 GHz. Those willing to shell out top dollar can upgrade all the way up to the new Nehalem-based Core i5 and i7 quad-core processors (but expect to pay $2,000 to get there).
The new 21.5-inch iMac features a 1920-by-1080 pixel display and the 27-inch iMac features a 2560-by-1440 pixel display. Pleasantly, both 21.5 and 27-inch displays use IPS panel technology.
Powering the pixels will either Nvidia GeForce 9400M integrated graphics or ATI Radeon HD 4670 discrete graphics (ATI Radeon HD 4850 discrete graphics in the 27-inch model).
If you're not into the idea of having a screen built into your computer, there's also an upgraded Mac Mini today. Starting at $599, the entry level Mac Mini features a faster 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor and 2GB of DDR3 1066 MHz memory, a 160GB hard drive, five USB 2.0 ports, FireWire 800, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics and a SuperDrive. The $799 Mac Mini features a 2.53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 4GB of memory and a larger 320GB hard drive.
For those using the Mac Mini a server, Apple now offers a $999 Mac Mini that is specially configured with Mac OS X Snow Leopard Server. Mac Mini with Snow Leopard Server features two 500GB hard drives for a total of 1TB of server storage in the tiny 6.5-inch square by 2-inch tall Mac Mini enclosure.
Apple today also announced the new plastic, unibody MacBook and the Magic Mouse.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Is Intel doomed?
- Want a Penryn processor crack open an apple!
- Apple Vs. IBM PC's
- Core2 released, AMD tanks, AMD buys ATI 2 survive, ATI tanks
- Apple C2D Question
- Sub $1,400 build or $2,000 iMac
- Value of my oldish computer
- Hey, Gramps, Can I Borrow Your Mac?
- Photo editing rig
- Is this better than a mac?
- ATI Video card in a G4 PowerMac 3,1 (AGP graphics)?
Related articles
-
Wolfgang Gruener What is it: 2007 Apple iMac, MacBook, MacBook Pro, MacPro, Mac mini; Dell Dimension C521, E521, Inspiron 1501, Latitude 131L, OptiPlex 740 Why we chose it: Let's start with Apple. There are friends who you never thought could be friends. If you are an Apple aficionado and have visited Steve Jobs keynotes in recent years, then you probably know all too well how those Power-whatever machines drove those mighty Xeon machines in the ditch and smoked one Photoshop benchmark record after another. There was lots of strange schadenfreude against Intel and unshakable enthusiasm for Apple, which you just knew would last for an eternity. But here is 2006 and Steve Jobs and Paul Otellini are best friends. How did that happen? You could speculate that Apple really did not have a choice in times where the Power architecture was outmuscled not only in terms of performance but especially in power efficiency and Apple was in dire need of a different supplier. We are still a bit dazzled that Apple went with Intel and not AMD, as the green team, at least from our view, would have been a better fit for the mentality of the Apple camp. But then, Steve Jobs has the kind of sales talent every company would kill for. Jobs could tell us the snow is black and we'd all believe it: In that view, the Intel proposition was really child's play. Nevertheless, the bottom line is that Apple made one gutsy move that could have resulted in a riot in the Apple crowd. The numbers, however, prove that it was the right decision. The company sold 30% more Macs in the most recent quarter (1.61 million) than a year ago (1.24 million). Plus, the user benefit is obvious: Besides more performance, Mac users get closer to a wealth of x86 applications and Windows guys have a real chance of getting their hands on a cutting edge-style machine without having to move to an entirely new system. We patiently will wait for the final version of the Bootcamp software. Dell-AMD Finally! Jeez, Dell, what took you so long? It appears that everyone always knew it was a matter of time when Dell couldn't resist the pressure of consumers asking for AMD anymore. I remember asking a PR representative in 1999, if AMD wouldn't be a great move for Dell and I heard the same "we are always evaluating other technologies ..." phrase then as I did earlier this year - when an analyst floated the rumor that a Dell-AMD announcement was very likely for this year. I discussed this topic with many tech journalists, including Charlie Demerjian from the Inquirer and we were quite certain that Dell would not go with AMD this year. A major concern was AMD's potential production capacity, which was rumored to be running around 90%+ even without Dell being a customer. Charlie was confident enough to put a bet on it against VoodooPC president Rahul Sood. I chickened out and turned Rahul's offer to join Charlie in this bet down, luckily, I have to say. As we know today, the Dell-AMD announcement came and Charlie had to do his IDF coverage in a bunny suit. But, if you remember, even Intel appeared to have been caught on the wrong foot: In a rather memorable email to Intel employees, Intel CEO Paul Otellini expressed his disappointment over Dell's move. But in the end, Dell had little choice, but to offer AMD processors to its customers. Starting with 4P servers, it was obvious that demand for Opterons were skyrocketing and HP and Sun were grabbing market share from Dell, practically unchallenged. Moving down the ladder to the desktop and notebook came a bit late, but was a natural extension of this strategy. Rumor has it that Dell used its bold AMD announcement to negotiate new prices with Intel, but - true or not - there is little doubt that Dell has made the right decision for its customers and itself - we just wish the company would have made this move three years earlier. What it means to you: More choice for everyone, that's what this industry should always be about. Bridges were built this year, enabling new products strong enough to be considered part of the most significant hardware announcements in 2006. The AMD-Dell announcement (we should not forget that Lenovo also adopted AMD) is especially significant, as it will strengthen AMD: A stronger AMD will promote healthier competition, in which AMD will be able to not only tease Intel once in a while. The result should be more innovation in the microprocessor segment than we have seen before, especially with ATI now being part of AMD. Predictions for 2007: Keep an eye on AMD becoming much more visible in the Dell lineup. Today, Dell is selling AMD mainly in entry-level configurations. Don't be too surprised seeing AMD's new processors, Kuma and Agena/FX, in the company's XPS series of notebooks and desktop computers. Apple is a tough one. People went bankrupt over betting on Apple products for the new year, so I will be very careful here. But I will say this: Apple will build a breakthrough entertainment PC based on Intel processors, it will roll out quad-core enthusiast Macs with more graphics capability and it will offer an UMPC-like touchscreen mobile computer, based on Intel ULV processors in 2007. Article Coverage: Apple announces Intel-Macs Dell's AMD computers now available Paul Otellini "incredibly" disappointed by Dell decision
-
What you will see at CES and MacWorld
The Consumer Electronics Show is coming up in a few short weeks (Jan 8-11). It can be a very depressing show because it effectively showcases just how much of the stuff you got over the holidays will soon be obsolete. Apple isn't at CES but won't make its customers sleep well either: The company is expected to announce a bunch of new products during MacWorld (Jan 8-12). Fortunately, you don't have to go to either show and can watch the blow by blow from the comfort of your own home. The Internet takes away the pressure to run around like crazy while trying to figure out what is, or is not, important. One of the treats of being an analyst and a CES judge is that you get early invitations from a variety of vendors that will give you a heads-up on what they will be promoting on the showfloor. Based on these details, you can make some determination what could be hot. Both shows, by the way, will have a huge consumer electronics focus this year. This is normal for CES but for Apple, this is the coming out party for their iTV, iPhone, and - you guessed it - yet another wave of iPod accessories. Since the Vista release draws close, Apple is expected to make a big Leopard announcement to counter what Microsoft will be talking about at CES. But there is going to be lots of other buzz as well. Displays grow, get LEDs and go wireless Current LCD displays use a fluorescent type of backlighting, which lasts between five and seven years and tends to wash out in very bright light. This is true of both monitors and LCD TVs. As Plasma makes its swan song in the market, expect to see a number of LED lighted LCD TV's and monitors showcased by the major brands for release in the second half of the year. Apple likes to go early with technologies like this, but this may be too early even for Apple. But they could have a surprise in this category, so keep your eagle eyes open. Display sizes are going up across the board with 46" LCD TVs going mainstream. There is a strong possibility we will see sharp price drops for TV's above 50". 24" monitors were the hot size this year; however, massive price drops year-over-year show that the next size up is 30". Dell currently has the most aggressively priced product in this category, while HP seems to lead with features. Apple trails and it is about time for Apple to give a more competitive response. In TVs, look for a big jump in wireless connectivity solutions. Unfortunately, you'll still have to plug them in but there will be a huge jump in the number of technology vendors showcasing capabilities that may make many of the cables connecting TVs to set top boxes obsolete resulting in much easier installations going forward. There is a possibility that we may see some LED lighted TV projectors but, for now, that is just a rumor. TV sound is going to get a huge boost. Advanced built in speakers will provide much stronger low end capability without separate sub-woofers and the technology that can make front speakers sound like they are behind you is expected to get more visibility at the show. Media Centers to Media Servers One of the big problems with PC-based Media Centers is they are relatively hard to set up and use. AMD has already started to showcase a Media Center design which is vastly easier to set up, because it has a built-in amplifier. In addition, AMD and other vendors have been hinting at building products using embedded versions of Linux and Microsoft technology to address the ease-of-use issues. Cisco is expected to be, either publically or quietly, showcase a product due late next year, which is based on an enhanced version of its Scientific Atlanta set top box technology. Code named "Cable Bypass Box," it is expected to light a fire under Internet-sourced high definition content. CES will be awash with Vista Media Center PCs. At least one will have a built-in amplifier and from what I have seen, it is as stunning as expensive. Some will use touch screen input and several of the designs look more advanced than, for example, Apple's iMac media solution. Apple will be showcasing its iTV and the question will be how it connects to other devices. Speculation is that there will be a special version of the Mac Mini configured to collect and share content. In addition, there is something apparently going on between Apple and Intel's Viiv initiative and that could result in a unique offering from both companies. Finally, a new class of product will emerge at CES, called a Media Server (we have already started to see products like this from companies like Maxtor). These products will collect and serve up media not only to the home but those that are traveling away from home as well. Eventually embracing functions from Home Automation to security and backup, this has a lot of vendors very excited right now. Watch for content deals that will define this space. The best hardware is worthless if it doesn't have content to play on it and the studios have not been on the same page with this stuff at all. Google and YouTube are expected to be big players in the future of these devices. Automotive Stereo Look for aftermarket products that now combine both sound and video. In addition, some of the more expensive devices will connect to wireless networks so they can update their repositories and we may be seeing the beginning of the end for CDs (actually that probably started when the first iPod shipped). Enhancements with both in car and handheld GPS products are expected to be seen from a variety of vendors. Integrated systems will more effectively update themselves for changing traffic conditions and be even more capable of calling for help when the driver is in trouble. In car displays will be getting both larger and cheaper and, here too, expect to see some with LED backlighting and an increased use of touch screens.
-
A problem that has plagued the x86-based Windows world of late is that of high power requirements. This has been especially true of systems based on current Intel processors , a fact we already covered extensively in previous articles. During testing, our Mac mini was able to shine in this respect, drawing a mere 20 watts of power; during DVD playback, this rose to only 28 W. In contrast, the power requirements of current Intel-based PC systems is anything but reasonable - under comparable conditions, these power-hungry machines draw up to 160 W , as tests in our THG lab have shown. Strictly speaking, the Intel system's 700% higher power draw (!!!) is not justifiable, considering today's energy costs. And users should definitely be considering the energy cost to run a computer, not just looking at the price tag on the machine. Corporate users, especially, need to think about long-term total cost of ownership (TCO). Great Sales Through Clear Design As a company, Apple's star does seem to be rising, at least where sales and profits are concerned. The last fiscal quarter was the best in the company's entire history. Apple owes a large part of this success to its trend-setting MP3 player, the iPod, which has reached a kind of cult status, selling more than 10 million units. Now, the new year is starting off with new products, such as the Mac mini and the iPod Shuffle. In Germany, as in most of the rest of the world, the classic PC sales strategy is simple - lure the buyer with high gigahertz numbers, tons of megaBytes and additional goodies. Yet despite the introduction of SFF (small form factor) PCs, it seems that design and the overall look still seem to be only of secondary importance. For years now, the average buyer has been fed the mantras of "high performance" and "good upgradeability." Obviously, the Mac mini has taken a completely different approach here, emphasizing compactness, style and simplicity. On To Further Successes In 2005 After The Record Year In 2004? Interested in a few numbers? In the fourth quarter of 2004, Apple sold 4.5 million iPod players, resulting in sales of $1.2 billion. This makes for an average price of $375 per unit - not bad at all for an MP3 player. The company's overall sales in 4Q04 totaled nearly $3.5 billion, an increase of 74% compared to the same quarter in 2003. Also, it has been able to sell more computers in the first quarter of this year: 1,046,000 units, again a 26% increase over the same period in the previous year. This resulted in profits of $1.6 billion. Apple sold 456,000 of the new iMacs alone. However, the Powerbooks have not been doing so well - 152,000 units sold means a decline in sales by 22% compared to the first quarter of 2004. iBooks, on the other hand, have gained momentum, selling 271,000 units, an increase of 35%. The "other music products" branch, which includes the iTunes music store and iPod accessories and services, is also very lucrative, with sales totaling $177 million, a 277% increase over Q1 '04.









Those new iMacs really are pretty good deals imo. I know I'll get negative votes to the extreme for saying a Mac is good value but $1999 for a Core i5 system or $2199 for a Core i7 system with a built in LED 27" display with a 2560x1440 resolution (beyond Full HD) is a relative steal.
As a comparison, a Dell XPS 8000 with similar specs comes out at $1069 (without Bluetooth). Considering the cost of LED display panels and the fact that Apple's $899 for its 24" 1080p LED panel is meant to be a relative steal for the cost of manufacturing, the extra $930 for an LED display with that resolution is really quite reasonable. When you factor in things like Education or Higher Education discounts, the iMacs really start to look very attractive price wise.
Adding the fact that the 27" built in display can be used as an external display for a separate device, I'd have to think long and hard about buying an Octo core workstation or a 27" Core i7 iMac and Core i7 gaming machine for pretty much the same price.
This is great news for Apple users. I think it may be time to look into one of these 27" units.
Mac OS Users: Tom's is currently conducting a poll with regards to a Mac OS forum.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/32340-12-forum
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] unix-forum
It's about time. Now they'll keep these processors for a year and a half, always at the same price point, and claim to be faster than newer windows-based machines.
It's about time. Now they'll keep these processors for a year and a half, always at the same price point, and claim to be faster than newer windows-based machines.
Not quite. They tend to update their iMac lines every 6-9 months. The average is about 7 and a quarter months. True they'll keep their price point though which is why its always worth buying Apple machines when they first come out. Macs tend to be pretty good value for money just after a line's been refreshed. Some models have been considerably cheaper than PC equivalents for quite a while after release (such as all Mac Pros until the Nehalem based ones).
The benefit though is that since their prices remain pretty constant also because there are only a few models to choose from and also since Macs are so fashionable and desirable, they retain their value very well. I.e. the resale value of one of these iMacs will not have dropped very much at all in six months. In three years time they'll also be worth a fair chunk more than similar priced Dells etc.
The 27" LED display makes these a fair bit better value than any PC and will stay so for a while imo because of the cost of LED displays of this size.
For anyone considering ever buying an iMac, now is certainly the best time ever.
wow where are all the PC guys, this looks like a Mac© LoveFest®
wow where are all the PC guys, this looks like a Mac© LoveFest®
they went core i7 about an year ago. oh well what`s an year behind nowdays and at 2k $ pricetag for a computer with 1 radeon HD 4850 card inside ...
The only thing that I like Mac is it Apple Cinema Display is a true 24 color LCD, not like most of PC LCD where its only 18 bit emulation
.
@ohim
i5 came out when? a month or so ago? and the i7 in there is the 860. Don't call mac people ignorant when your post is clearly biased and misrepresenting the facts
@ohimi5 came out when? a month or so ago? and the i7 in there is the 860. Don't call mac people ignorant when your post is clearly biased and misrepresenting the facts
as you can clearly see i pointed out only i7 and talking about it as architecture not the model number in particular. Shall i continue about the graphic card too ?
they went core i7 about an year ago. oh well what`s an year behind nowdays and at 2k $ pricetag for a computer with 1 radeon HD 4850 card inside ...
Or a $2k price tag for a machine with an LED backlit 1440p 27" IPS panel. Which makes it a relative steal. The 4850 isn't a bad card and is pretty much the best mobile graphics solution currently available and thus pretty much the best that can fit in this form factor.
If you're a gamer, you won't be buying a mac for gaming. If you're not a gamer then a 4850 is pretty respectable graphics.
Well, I will admit I like the 27" Core i7 iMac, but this is real life, and I got bills and a mortgage to pay. The only core i7 machine in my future is that new HP Dv6t Quad laptops, which is selling for $799 (using coupon code: NBSC314243) with the Core i7 720QM cpu, 3GB DDR3 ram, 320GB 7200rpm hard drive, 1GB nvidia GeForce GT 230M, and DVD+-RW drive.
Again, the 27" Core i7 iMac is a nice machine, but $2,199.00 is completely unrealistic for me. I am looking for a quad core computer for my next machine to run (and also write) highly threaded applications, but there is this thing called a recession and it actually does affect some of us.
I also do not understand why Apple couldn't make a Core i7 Mobile Mac Mini. Before you all jump all over me about costs, the 720QM Core i7 Mobile cpu costs the same price as the Core 2 Duo T9400 (2.53 GHz mobile cpu).
I would've been willing to pay $799 for that, or even $899 if they included a GPU with dedicated Vram.
Well, at least Windows 7 is a major improvement. I think the only thing I will miss when I switch back is going to be the chat client Adium. It's funny how there are so many developers for the Windows platform, and yet no one could make a chat client that works as great as Adium. I've Digsby, Pidgin, AIM, etc... on the Windows side.
IMO this is not such a great deal.
$1200 for a 21 inch display and core2duo? Such a computer and monitor can be had for the $500-$600 range.
$2000 for an i5 or i7 system? That's ridiculous. On newegg, you can get a good i5/i7 processor from $200-$300. You can build a computer with an i7 and HD 5850 for $1000, 1080p monitor included. Granted this is pre-built for you, but if we are going to call it a deal the price should at least be in the same ballpark as building it yourself.
The 2560 x 1440 display sounds nice, but do you really expect to get any performance at that resolution with an HD 4850? Even if the HD 4850 could perform at that resolution...the only source material that is capable of beyond 1080p is PC games...and this is a Mac.
Or a $2k price tag for a machine with an LED backlit 1440p 27" IPS panel. Which makes it a relative steal. The 4850 isn't a bad card and is pretty much the best mobile graphics solution currently available and thus pretty much the best that can fit in this form factor.If you're a gamer, you won't be buying a mac for gaming. If you're not a gamer then a 4850 is pretty respectable graphics.
But if your not gaming then what is the use of 1440p? Not trying to flame or anything....I just really want to know!
FYI...LED TVs are available at 32" for $800.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6889101201
I also do not understand why Apple couldn't make a Core i7 Mobile Mac Mini. Before you all jump all over me about costs, the 720QM Core i7 Mobile cpu costs the same price as the Core 2 Duo T9400 (2.53 GHz mobile cpu). I would've been willing to pay $799 for that, or even $899 if they included a GPU with dedicated Vram. Well, at least Windows 7 is a major improvement. I think the only thing I will miss when I switch back is going to be the chat client Adium. It's funny how there are so many developers for the Windows platform, and yet no one could make a chat client that works as great as Adium. I've Digsby, Pidgin, AIM, etc... on the Windows side.
Although things like heat dissipation will play a role the biggest factor will be that Apple wants the Mac Minis to be the entry level Mac. As such it has to be less powerful than all the other Macs. Apple would rather users buy an iMac than a Mac Mini + a third party display. Having a $799 Core i7 Mac Mini would also completely kill the entry level (and stupidly overpriced) Mac Pro.
They are actually pretty price competitive with competing all-in-ones, I just checked. But the problem is that Apple insists on their release cycles, while other PC makers trickle down new hardware through their lineups as it becomes available. So at launch, an Apple product is price-competitive, but just months in it isnt.
I agree with a lot of the pro Mac comments above, but they are all missing a new component that sounds like a first in computer design. Each iMac has two built-in 17 watt high-efficiency audio amplifiers that is supposed to kick-ass over the old system.
Mac Mini Server has my interest.
With the software the comes bundled with every Mac these are some great deals that will force Microsoft's hand.
IMO this is not such a great deal.$1200 for a 21 inch display and core2duo? Such a computer and monitor can be had for the $500-$600 range.$2000 for an i5 or i7 system? That's ridiculous. On newegg, you can get a good i5/i7 processor from $200-$300. You can build a computer with an i7 and HD 5850 for $1000, 1080p monitor included. Granted this is pre-built for you, but if we are going to call it a deal the price should at least be in the same ballpark as building it yourself. The 2560 x 1440 display sounds nice, but do you really expect to get any performance at that resolution with an HD 4850? Even if the HD 4850 could perform at that resolution...the only source material that is capable of beyond 1080p is PC games...and this is a Mac.
Not true, the desktop space for one thing would be great and many to most cameras take pictures larger than that. If you bootcamped it or just Mac written games, there are some you know, you could down scale the game down to 1920 x1200 or less to make it playable.
i tried working out a spec similar to the imac core i7 27" w newegg prices. you can config for only $1700 tax included. my appreciation for the imac 27 is the LCD, what what running inside is way behind what pc can offer. and i believe the corei7 is an i5-860 running at 2.8. what they have is not a triple channel system. its a good multi media for movies... but serious gaming, i doubt it. and with $2000 i can build a better spec plus 2 pieces 27" inches and the ati 5850.
Anyone know which version of Snow Leopard server the new Mini comes with? It's an amazing deal if its the unlimited licence one, a mediocre deal if its the 10 client one.
[Quote]both 21.5 and 27-inch displays use IPS panel technology.[/Quote]
Thank god!
9400M is so 3 years ago. They pop for an i5 and i7 but stick with moldy graphics. They could have at least gotten some 9600GTM, thats not a bad chip overall.
But if your not gaming then what is the use of 1440p? Not trying to flame or anything....I just really want to know!FYI...LED TVs are available at 32" for $800.http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6889101201
IMO this is not such a great deal.$1200 for a 21 inch display and core2duo? Such a computer and monitor can be had for the $500-$600 range.$2000 for an i5 or i7 system? That's ridiculous. On newegg, you can get a good i5/i7 processor from $200-$300. You can build a computer with an i7 and HD 5850 for $1000, 1080p monitor included. Granted this is pre-built for you, but if we are going to call it a deal the price should at least be in the same ballpark as building it yourself. The 2560 x 1440 display sounds nice, but do you really expect to get any performance at that resolution with an HD 4850? Even if the HD 4850 could perform at that resolution...the only source material that is capable of beyond 1080p is PC games...and this is a Mac.
There's no way you can get a computer with a 21" 1080p LED based IPS display for $500-$600. Find me a 21" 1080p LED based IPS panel for that money and I'll take it back. Yes you can build a machine with a 1080p display for far less than the iMac 27" but you will not have a display of even remotely as good quality. LED TVs are a different ball game and fitting 1080p into 32" isn't exactly hard or expensive to do. 2560p is a tad harder.
To give you an idea of the value of the display in the 27" iMac:
LG do a 1920x1080 24" for $329.95. (LED TN panel)
Apple do a 1920x1200 24" for $899.00. (LED IPS panel)
LG do a 1920x1200 24" for ~$1600 (RGB LED IPS panel)
HP do a 1920x1200 24" for $1919.99 (RGB LED IPS panel)
LaCie do a 2560x1600 30" for $3399 (RGB LED IPS panel)
Samsung do a 2560x1600 30" for $3345 (RGB LED IPS panel)
As you can see, the jump up over single link DVI resolutions results in quite a price hike and the jump to IPS panels over Tn panels results in a hike in price too (as do RGB LED over LED). The word is that Apple's 24" display is very well priced for an RGB LED IPS display of its caliber. Since a non LED but still IPS panel still costs at least about $1049 for the two year old Dell model, you can do some pretty rough maths to see that a 27" LED IPS panel would cost somewhere around $1200-$1500 at a guess. I've even heard some people considering getting a 27" entry level iMac at $1699 and using it as a display for a workstation since its only $300 or so more than a Dell 3008WFP 30" display and yet has nearly the same resolution, nearly the same size, a far superior backlight, similar panel quality and yet comes with a whole computer inside which could always come in handy one day.
Anyone know which version of Snow Leopard server the new Mini comes with? It's an amazing deal if its the unlimited licence one, a mediocre deal if its the 10 client one.
Snow Leopard server only comes in one form, unlimited license only. $499 when bought separately.
9400M is so 3 years ago. They pop for an i5 and i7 but stick with moldy graphics. They could have at least gotten some 9600GTM, thats not a bad chip overall.
They're using nVidia's chipset with the integrated 9400m in the Core 2 Duo iMacs. That's the latest integrated graphics nVidia do. Considering the first 9 series desktop chips from nVidia were released on February 21st 2008 and the 9400m first shipped (in a Mac before PCs) on October 14th 2008, its hardly fair to say that they're using chips that are "so 3 years' old. The 9400m is perfect for users who don't need any kind of graphics power at all but could still do with stuff like video decoding etc.
Not true, the desktop space for one thing would be great and many to most cameras take pictures larger than that. If you bootcamped it or just Mac written games, there are some you know, you could down scale the game down to 1920 x1200 or less to make it playable.
Desktop space? How much desktop space do we need? At that resolution font would be unbearably small! I understand the photo editing argument for professional photographers, but for the vast majority of people just printing out standard sized pictures 1440p is way over kill. If you are going to scaled down to 1080p, what is the point of having a 1440p monitor? Check the graphics benchmarks, the HD 4850 is not even playable at 1080p.
i tried working out a spec similar to the imac core i7 27" w newegg prices. you can config for only $1700 tax included. my appreciation for the imac 27 is the LCD, what what running inside is way behind what pc can offer. and i believe the corei7 is an i5-860 running at 2.8. what they have is not a triple channel system. its a good multi media for movies... but serious gaming, i doubt it. and with $2000 i can build a better spec plus 2 pieces 27" inches and the ati 5850.
I can config for much less than $1700...(these are all very conservative prices, you could find a better deal) the i5 is roughly $200, motherboard $150, 4 GB RAM $150, CPU and Case $100, 1 TB Hard drive $100, OS $100, HD 4850 $100, 28" 1080p 3ms response monitor $300. Total = $1200. With a HD 5850 instead of HD 4850 it is $1350. Much better deal IMO considering usability of 1440p is rare, and my hardware config is better.
So Where's Blue-ray?
There's no way you can get a computer with a 21" 1080p LED based IPS display for $500-$600. Find me a 21" 1080p LED based IPS panel for that money and I'll take it back. Yes you can build a machine with a 1080p display for far less than the iMac 27" but you will not have a display of even remotely as good quality. LED TVs are a different ball game and fitting 1080p into 32" isn't exactly hard or expensive to do. 2560p is a tad harder.To give you an idea of the value of the display in the 27" iMac:LG do a 1920x1080 24" for $329.95. (LED TN panel)Apple do a 1920x1200 24" for $899.00. (LED IPS panel)LG do a 1920x1200 24" for ~$1600 (RGB LED IPS panel)HP do a 1920x1200 24" for $1919.99 (RGB LED IPS panel)LaCie do a 2560x1600 30" for $3399 (RGB LED IPS panel)Samsung do a 2560x1600 30" for $3345 (RGB LED IPS panel)As you can see, the jump up over single link DVI resolutions results in quite a price hike and the jump to IPS panels over Tn panels results in a hike in price too (as do RGB LED over LED). The word is that Apple's 24" display is very well priced for an RGB LED IPS display of its caliber. Since a non LED but still IPS panel still costs at least about $1049 for the two year old Dell model, you can do some pretty rough maths to see that a 27" LED IPS panel would cost somewhere around $1200-$1500 at a guess. I've even heard some people considering getting a 27" entry level iMac at $1699 and using it as a display for a workstation since its only $300 or so more than a Dell 3008WFP 30" display and yet has nearly the same resolution, nearly the same size, a far superior backlight, similar panel quality and yet comes with a whole computer inside which could always come in handy one day.
I didn't read that the 21" screen is LED. I thought that was offered only on the 27". But that is beside the point. Does the average consumer even care about having an LED screen? Who is going to pay that much just to get an LED over an LCD monitor? The resolution is the same, the screen size is the same, the average consumer won't care. The extra $400 is pretty hefty for a very incremental upgrade.
Although things like heat dissipation will play a role the biggest factor will be that Apple wants the Mac Minis to be the entry level Mac. As such it has to be less powerful than all the other Macs. Apple would rather users buy an iMac than a Mac Mini + a third party display. Having a $799 Core i7 Mac Mini would also completely kill the entry level (and stupidly overpriced) Mac Pro.
I disagree. As good as Intel's new Core i7 Mobile cpus are, they can not hold a candle to their desktop or workstation big brothers. Although, to most people, a 720QM would be far more than they need, which I assume would definitely eliminate most people's need for Apple's $2000+ quad core offerings.
Like I said above, I would absolutely love a that 27" iMac with the Core i7 cpu, but it's cost prohibitive. I am juggling a mortgage, car loan, bills, and my tuition for grad school. I haven't seen a pay increase in well over a year, and probably won't see one until late 2011 because of the budget issues and economy, unless I find another job before then (which is unlikely given how terrible economy is).
But, I would like an inexpensive quad core machine, which I can take to class in the evenings. Especially since I am going to be doing Parallel Computing course(s) in the Spring, which is what my planned focus is.
Desktop space? How much desktop space do we need? At that resolution font would be unbearably small! I understand the photo editing argument for professional photographers, but for the vast majority of people just printing out standard sized pictures 1440p is way over kill. If you are going to scaled down to 1080p, what is the point of having a 1440p monitor? Check the graphics benchmarks, the HD 4850 is not even playable at 1080p.I can config for much less than $1700...(these are all very conservative prices, you could find a better deal) the i5 is roughly $200, motherboard $150, 4 GB RAM $150, CPU and Case $100, 1 TB Hard drive $100, OS $100, HD 4850 $100, 28" 1080p 3ms response monitor $300. Total = $1200. With a HD 5850 instead of HD 4850 it is $1350. Much better deal IMO considering usability of 1440p is rare, and my hardware config is better.
1440p is overkill because?? 1920x1200 was considered overkill just a few years ago. 1280x1024 was considered overkill just a few years before.
2560x1440p is in no way overkill for normal users. You can have so much more stuff up at once. I've got loads of windows open on my display right now. When I work at writing reports or coding, its incredibly useful to have multiple windows open at once and being able to see them all. My productivity is definitely higher and using such a display is far more enjoyable. Think about it this way, would you rather work at a small classroom sized single person desk or would you rather work at a dining table?
As far as your specs go, your choice in monitor is seriously poor in comparison. Comparing a $300 monitor to a 2560x1440p LED display with an IPS panel is like comparing a Suzuki SX4 or a VW Passat Jetta S to a BMW M5 because "they're about the same size and have five seats".
Scratch $400, the price increase from LCD 1080p to LED 1080p is even greater than $400.
What it boils down to:
LCD 28" 1080p 3ms response for $300
or
LED (your specs and prices) 27" 1440p for $1200 to $1500.
Do you really think that is worth it?
I disagree. As good as Intel's new Core i7 Mobile cpus are, they can not hold a candle to their desktop or workstation big brothers. Although, to most people, a 720QM would be far more than they need, which I assume would definitely eliminate most people's need for Apple's $2000+ quad core offerings. Like I said above, I would absolutely love a that 27" iMac with the Core i7 cpu, but it's cost prohibitive. I am juggling a mortgage, car loan, bills, and my tuition for grad school. I haven't seen a pay increase in well over a year, and probably won't see one until late 2011 because of the budget issues and economy, unless I find another job before then (which is unlikely given how terrible economy is). But, I would like an inexpensive quad core machine, which I can take to class in the evenings. Especially since I am going to be doing Parallel Computing course(s) in the Spring, which is what my planned focus is.
I feel what you're saying. I'm sure Core i5 chips will end up across Apple's line up but not until after the MacBook Pros have got them first. The non i7 iMacs and all the Mac Minis, MacBooks and MacBook Pros currently use pretty much the same internals, all based off an nForce chipset. Right now Apple doesn't have much choice in terms of i5/i7 mobile chipsets with semi-decent integrated graphic. NVidia's pulled out of the i5/i7 chipset development game and Intel's only mobile iX chipset available is the PM55 which doesn't have integrated graphics.
Unfortunately you fall into a small niche of users that need something quite specific at a budget. As a programmer who deals with parallel code in academia, I quite understand why you need an i5/i7 machine. Luckily I've had a quad Mac Pro for three years now so I can do a fair bit on that but I'd really like to get a Nehalem based 8 core machine soon but Apple's latest Mac Pro pricing is far too prohibitive and ridiculous.