Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Overvolted RAM May Kill Your Core i7 CPU

By - Source: Tom's Hardware

Memory controllers built into the upcoming Core i7 processors could change the way some enthusiasts push their systems beyond spec. Vendors such as Corsair, OCZ, Kingston and other companies market what is referred to as “enthusiast” memory. Enthusiast memory generally has ratings that go beyond JEDEC specifications.

Enthusiast modules need more voltage to run at their rated specifications. On high-end boards geared towards this type of thing, it is generally not a problem however, it could be a potential issue once the Core i7 (Nehalem family) starts cropping up on shelves.

In a report from Custom PC, The P6T Deluxe board from Asus due out soon has a sticker covering its DIMM slots that reads :

According to Intel CPU spec, DIMMs with voltage setting over 1.65V may damage the CPU permanently. We recommend you install the DIMMs with the voltage settings below 1.65V.” According to Iain Bristow, spokesman for Asus, “the sticker had been placed on the motherboard after Intel’s recommendation.”

Memory controllers inside the Core i7 processors support DDR3 memory. JEDEC specifies a standard voltage of 1.5V for that memory type, so this 1.65V limit would leave little leeway for over voltage within specification. This will sure cause enthusiasts to scrutinize over which modules they purchase more carefully. Currently, many enthusiast models go far outside the JEDEC standard of 1.5, coming in around 1.9V to reach rated specification.

Let us not forgot that manufacturers have always recommended against over voltage and clocking in some form or another – but it does not mean you cannot do it. We are pretty certain that this shouldn’t cause a big issue in the long run. The only real difference is that novices will now be more prone to burning out their processors instead of their boards / memory first. Depending on which model of processor is being used, it could be a more costly mistake.

The pioneer overclocking crowd will surely push everything as far as possible to deliver the down-low. For now, there is really no big concern as we take the back seat and wait for actual results.

There are 26 Comments.
Other Comments
  • 5
    jj463rd , October 9, 2008 4:42 AM
    I bet we will soon be hearing about a lot of careless Core i7 system builders screwing up their newly built systems at the forums.We will soon hear "I am never building another Intel system".
    It might be fun for some laughs for a while.
  • 2
    seboj , October 9, 2008 11:47 PM
    Quote:
    why overclock in the first place?


    Because OverClocking is life.

    There's a saying "You, sir, are obviously full of fail".
  • 2
    anonymous@guest , October 9, 2008 4:46 AM
    Personally, I find this information about as useful as a milk bucket under a bull currently. As mentioned in the article, John Q. Public hasn't even seen the first full review yet, let alone being able to purchase it. With that said, one wonders, will the tri-channel configuration bandwidth performance make enough difference to not really have to o'clock the DIMMs and rely strictly on the CPU bus speed for performance increases?
Display more comments