Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Sapphire Releases Performance-boosting BIOS for its R9-290

By - Source: TechPowerUp | B 25 comments

Sapphire has released a performance-enhancing BIOS for its R9-290 graphics cards, and given us the announcement that we've all been waiting for.

The Radeon R9-290 and Radeon R9-290X graphics cards have become known for being very powerful, though very loud as well. One of the key characteristics of the graphics cards is the way that their thermals, fan speeds and clock speeds are managed. Since the graphics cards stock coolers are not powerful enough by default to run the card at full speed, AMD's PowerTune technology will dynamically turn down the GPUs clock speed to prevent the GPU from overheating.

Previously, the default maximum fan speed that the cards operated at was 40 percent. While this still stands for the R9-290X, to give the R9-290 a performance boost, AMD had released a driver update to get the fan running at 47 percent. Now, Sapphire has done the same thing for its own R9-290, however, rather than releasing it in the form of a driver, it has released a new BIOS for the graphics card. While in practice you're unlikely to notice a difference between a driver fix or a BIOS fix, it is somewhat reassuring knowing that it is now hardcoded into the BIOS, and not ran as an override.

Furthermore, while no details were provided, Sapphire has announced that in the coming weeks it will be coming out with various different R9-290 graphics cards built on its own designs, with better cooling solutions. If you're in the market for an R9-290 card, you're probably better off waiting for custom cards to come out, unless you don't mind the hassle of slapping a big Arctic Accelero Xtreme III cooler onto it.

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
  • 6 Hide
    UVB076 , November 26, 2013 4:46 PM
    I think AMD really shot themselves in the foot by not just letting the board partners make custom coolers, their stock coolers are honestly quite crap.
  • 1 Hide
    InvalidError , November 26, 2013 4:48 PM
    It would not take much to substantially increase AMD's reference cooler's efficiency: simply rotate the fan's blade 5-10 degrees counter-clockwise.

    The way they are on the reference fan, each blade is scooping up air in a direction perpendicular to rotation and flat in the wake of the next blade in front. Maximum noise, minimum airflow. The slight blade angle change deflects the wake outwards and bites into incoming air on the inner edge. Quieter with better airflow.
  • 0 Hide
    danwat1234 , November 26, 2013 5:03 PM
    Or here's an idea, allow the fan to reach 100% RPM in certain scenarios. It's sad that the GPU clocks down, reducing computation before the fan even reaches 50% speed.
  • Display all 25 comments.
  • -2 Hide
    InvalidError , November 26, 2013 5:22 PM
    Quote:
    Or here's an idea, allow the fan to reach 100% RPM in certain scenarios.

    An horribly flawed fan design running at 100% would be horribly noisy and not necessarily provide much extra airflow.
  • 0 Hide
    eklipz330 , November 26, 2013 5:26 PM
    the most obvious flaw with these blower type coolers is that since the fan is only exhausting in one direction over useful components, it is LITERALLY half as effective as it should be
  • 1 Hide
    danwat1234 , November 26, 2013 5:36 PM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Or here's an idea, allow the fan to reach 100% RPM in certain scenarios.

    An horribly flawed fan design running at 100% would be horribly noisy and not necessarily provide much extra airflow.

    Well you have a point there if turbulence just increases instead of increased CFM? But if it does increase air flow significantly then I think it should be an option. Power to the people

  • -1 Hide
    InvalidError , November 26, 2013 6:12 PM
    Quote:
    Well you have a point there if turbulence just increases instead of increased CFM?

    My bet is that noise would ramp up much faster than CFM does, which would be consistent with complaints about how quickly noise ramps up for little to no apparent cooling gain.
  • 0 Hide
    lunyone , November 26, 2013 7:18 PM
    I would have put on a better stock fan and released it to the media first and let them know that the stock cooler is being re-worked for better cooling efficiency. This way you release a better quality cooler to the reviewers and have a bit of time to get all of your stock coolers re-done. But how it is right now the stock cooler is crap for these cards and it affects the noise and general impressions.
  • 5 Hide
    ingtar33 , November 26, 2013 9:06 PM
    amd really released a dynamite gpu... i mean the benching results of the r9-290x under water show it's just as fast as the 780ti at the same clocks... and it seems to hit roughly the same top end as the 780ti (1300-1400) under water. So we're talking about what should be the top gpu on the market... or atleast tied as the best gpu on the market, and they handicap it with a worthless gpu cooler and call it a feature!!

    Seriously sometimes i think AMD likes to shoot itself in the foot just for the fun of it.
  • 0 Hide
    m32 , November 26, 2013 9:42 PM
    As soon as the aftermarket coolers come, the r9 290(x) will remove the "hot" label it has. The cooler just sucks! It isn't enough to keep it cool and it is loud. At least we have the 'peace of mind' that the gpu core can handle 95c that it will never see when the partners get it right.
  • 0 Hide
    InvalidError , November 26, 2013 11:37 PM
    Quote:
    The cooler just sucks!

    The heatsink itself is most likely perfectly fine. What kills it is the fan.
  • 0 Hide
    eldragon0 , November 27, 2013 2:30 AM
    How bout we put this up on the front page so people know that the coolers ARE coming this year. Lots of sites are saying late January.
  • 0 Hide
    RazberyBandit , November 27, 2013 2:32 AM
    Quote:
    The heatsink itself is most likely perfectly fine. What kills it is the fan.

    No, the entire thing is just horrible for these GPUs. It's the same heatsink design used on the HD4890 by AMD (excuse me, ATI) five years ago. The 4890 is a sub-200W TDP GPU, and it also suffered fan noise complaints at any setting greater than 40%. The R9 290 & 290X have TDPs much closer to 300W TDP than 200W, making the heatsink itself entirely insufficient.
  • -1 Hide
    korsen , November 27, 2013 5:24 AM
    All I have to say is: Performance Boosting Bios - Now Known As A Faster Fan... >_> Wonder how many more points in 3DMark you can get with that sweet new fan speed... How does fan overclocking work?

    Idiots.
  • -2 Hide
    realAMDfreak , November 27, 2013 5:54 AM
    Yeah, go AMD. Keep Pimpin'
  • 3 Hide
    06yfz450ridr , November 27, 2013 8:05 AM
    its called msi afterburner, set a custom fan curve, set 100% fan speed to 80c and you're all set.

    How hard is that to do.
  • 4 Hide
    Steveymoo , November 27, 2013 8:18 AM
    Call me a fool, but I went ahead and got a stock HIS r9-290 the other day. I gotta say, I'm not sure where all of the noise complaints are coming from. It's hella quick, and you can barely hear it while playing BF4 at 1080p. It's quieter, and less whiny than my pair of old gtx 460s.
  • -1 Hide
    korsen , November 27, 2013 8:57 AM
    All I have to say is: Performance Boosting Bios - Now Known As A Faster Fan... >_> Wonder how many more points in 3DMark you can get with that sweet new fan speed... How does fan overclocking work?

    Idiots.
  • 0 Hide
    hannibal , November 27, 2013 9:36 AM
    Hmmm. I supose that Saphire use that special Bios in their own board with their own cooling system (like it is said in the end of article.
    Quote:
    "Sapphire has announced that in the coming weeks it will be coming out with various different R9-290 graphics cards built on its own designs, with better cooling solutions."
    ) . Nice to see some real 290 stuff coming and not these not so great standard versions!
  • 0 Hide
    Leafar Zurc , November 27, 2013 11:36 AM
    I just made a custom water cooling on my R9 problem solved
Display more comments