- The Athlon 64 FX Overclocked to 3 GHz
- Live Stress Test Rundown: AMD vs. Intel
- The AMD and Intel Energy Crisis
- Athlon 64 FX-57: Great Performance, High Price
- Dual Core Stress Test: AMD vs. Intel
- Dothan Over Netburst: Is The Pentium 4 A Dead End?
- AMD's Dual Core Athlon 64 X2 Strikes Hard
- The Pentium D: Intel's Dual Core Silver Bullet Previewed
- Prescott Reworked: The P4 600 Series and Extreme Edition 3.73 GHz
- Fast Computer On The Cheap? The Sempron 3100+ On Overdrive
Athlon 64 Or Sempron 64
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: a, dissatifying, compromise, amd
Syndication:
Athlon 64 Or Sempron 64

We decided to include benchmark results of three Athlon 64 processors, to compare them to the Sempron 3300+ and 3400+. Both entry-level Athlon 64's for Socket 939 platforms (3000+ and 3200+) cost only a bit more than the Sempron 3400+, but feature a full-fledged 512 kB of cache and the dual channel DDR400 memory interface. The difference in platform costs starts at $15 and goes much higher, depending on the features you insist on.
We also chose to compare the new Sempron to the Socket 754 Athlon 64 3200+, based on the Newcastle core, since it is the Athlon 64 equivalent of the Sempron at the same clock speed. Admittedly, Newcastle is a 130 nm core without the memory controller improvements and without SSE3, but we haven't come across a 90 nm Socket 754 Athlon 64 yet.
- Previous page Sempron 3400+
- Next page Test Setup