Intel reportedly no longer working on 6-core Nova Lake mobile SKU, alleges new rumor — Wildcat Lake Refresh to become focus for next-gen budget markets instead

News
By published

The demand for Wildcat Lake is apparently the reason behind the shift.

Core Series 3 (Wildcat Lake) CPU
(Image credit: Intel)

Following Panther Lake, Intel's upcoming Nova Lake family is set to be a true next-gen leap as well. While Panther Lake is mobile-only, Nova Lake is desktop-first but also has mobile parts, just like the current Arrow Lake (refresh) lineup. Prior leaks have indicated that NVL scales from 6 cores all the way up to 52 cores at the top-end, but a new rumor from tipster Jaykihn says the 6-core mobile SKU has been shelved.

As you'd expect, the 6-core part in question would've been the lowest-end offering from Nova Lake, targeted entirely at the budget segment. The issue is, Intel already launched a product for this market, and it's called Wildcat Lake — the successor to Twin Lake. The lineup was announced in April and is meant exclusively for low-end laptops, mini-PCs, and edge. It shares an architectural foundation with Panther Lake and is limited to 6 cores.

The 6-core Nova Lake SKU would have reportedly featured 2 P-cores and 4 LP-E cores, which is the same as Wildcat Lake's current maxed-out configuration. The difference would lie in the architecture since Nova Lake is expected to switch to Coyote Cove P-cores and Arctic Wolf E-cores/LP-E cores, while Wildcat Lake (and Panther Lake) right now use Cougar Cove P-cores and Darkmont E-cores/LP-E cores.

Latest Videos From

Therefore, a Nova Lake CPU featuring 6 cores would overlap with Wildcat Lake, or more specifically, whatever the Wildcat Lake refresh will be. Either product could end up cannibalizing the other, but since Wildcat Lake already exists with unneeded I/O stripped out to save costs, it makes sense to leave the entry-level Nova Lake silicon behind. After all, demand for Wildcat Lake is exceeding Intel's own expectations.

With the advent of Apple's MacBook Neo, there's a rejuvenated interest in capturing this segment of the market since the Neo is so competitive. At Computex 2026, we've seen a few promising options that should challenge the Neo with perhaps even better specs, all powered by Wildcat Lake. Putting a costlier Nova Lake chip in one of these laptops next year just wouldn't allow for aggressive pricing.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

7 Comments Comment from the forums
  • usertests
    I beat the story by 20 minutes!

    Therefore, a Nova Lake CPU featuring 6 cores would overlap with Wildcat Lake, or more specifically, whatever the Wildcat Lake refresh will be.
    The same leaker has said that Wildcat Lake Refresh optionally adds two more P-cores, for 4+0+4. But nothing else changes, same 2 Xe3 cores.

    That would require a new die/tile as far as I know, so we'll see if it actually happens. If it does happen, it's much better than what typically passes for a refresh.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    usertests said:
    That would require a new die/tile as far as I know, so we'll see if it actually happens. If it does happen, it's much better than what typically passes for a refresh.
    Well we already have PTL-U, which is a 4+0+4 config.
    I know it's a different design but if they were to refresh PTL-U into WCL-R I wouldn't be surprised as like a "core 400" series. They definitely want to sell a lot of these PTL-U chips, and that would bea good way to do that (I believe Ian quoted some 40 million units by the end of the year).
    Reply
  • usertests
    User of Computers said:
    Well we already have PTL-U, which is a 4+0+4 config.
    I know it's a different design but if they were to refresh PTL-U into WCL-R I wouldn't be surprised as like a "core 400" series. They definitely want to sell a lot of these PTL-U chips, and that would bea good way to do that (I believe Ian quoted some 40 million units by the end of the year).
    Wildcat Lake mashes CPU and graphics into the same tile, whereas Panther Lake has them on separate tiles.

    Nerfing Panther Lake-U tiles to make it suitable as WCL-R might not make sense. On the other hand, Wildcat Lake Refresh would need a new CPU/GPU tile if it's bespoke. But the PCH tile can stay the same, so there's that. Guess we'll find out.

    Adding two P-cores to Wildcat Lake might make it faster than the i9-9900K when it's not throttled. Compare to Core Ultra 5 325 as a stand-in.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    usertests said:
    Wildcat Lake mashes CPU and graphics into the same tile, whereas Panther Lake has them on separate tiles.

    Nerfing Panther Lake-U tiles to make it suitable as WCL-R might not make sense. On the other hand, Wildcat Lake Refresh would need a new CPU/GPU tile if it's bespoke. But the PCH tile can stay the same, so there's that. Guess we'll find out.
    yeah that's the rub there, I'm not sure if it's worth it for Intel to re-use the entire PTL-U stack (with the same io, gpu, compute) tiles in such cheap devices.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    usertests said:
    Adding two P-cores to Wildcat Lake might make it faster than the i9-9900K when it's not throttled. Compare to Core Ultra 5 325 as a stand-in.
    hah! that's a fun thought.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    User of Computers said:
    Well we already have PTL-U, which is a 4+0+4 config.
    I know it's a different design but if they were to refresh PTL-U into WCL-R I wouldn't be surprised as like a "core 400" series. They definitely want to sell a lot of these PTL-U chips, and that would bea good way to do that (I believe Ian quoted some 40 million units by the end of the year).
    There's basically zero chance they reuse PTL for the WCL refresh. The cost difference between the two designs is significant in terms of silicon and packaging. It'll be a new die and I'd be surprised if there was any difference from current WCL aside from the additional 2 P-cores.
    Reply
  • User of Computers
    thestryker said:
    There's basically zero chance they reuse PTL for the WCL refresh. The cost difference between the two designs is significant in terms of silicon and packaging. It'll be a new die and I'd be surprised if there was any difference from current WCL aside from the additional 2 P-cores.
    That makes sense.
    Reply